Chapter 5.11 Describing people: stature, temperament, emotion and evaluation

Malcolm Ross and Meredith Osmond

1. Introduction⇫

This chapter collects together terms that people use to describe each other and to express their own feelings. It includes terms used to describe

  • a person’s physical qualities (§11.2): tall vs short, big vs small, fat vs thin and strong vs weak ;
  • a person’s temperament (§11.3): tame vs untamed, brave vs cowardly, obstinate, ignorant vs wise and stupid vs intelligent;
  • a person’s emotions (§11.4): afraid, ashamed, compassionate, happy, sad, angry, confused, surprised;
  • wanting (§11.5);
  • one’s evaluation of someone or something as good or bad (§11.6).

This is quite a mixed bag, both semantically and formally. Terms of temperament, emotion and wanting normally describe only human beings and sometimes higher animals, but terms used to describe physical qualities or to express an evaluation are applied to a wider range of referents that includes inanimates. Terms of temperament, emotion and wanting are quite often BPMs, as they denote human affective states. The range of meanings found in the headings in this chapter is somewhat restricted. For example, we tried to reconstruct terms for ‘lazy’ vs ‘hard-working’ and ‘generous’ vs ‘mean’, but could not do so because cognate sets are at best very local. One reason for this is certainly that speakers are creative in their use of metaphor, and so one term or metaphor is easily replaced by another. An associated reason is that many of our sources do not record the complex lexemes that result from metaphorical usage. Although BPMs occur for various aspects of wanting and desire, none are recorded in §11.5 because there is little conceptual similarity among languages.

Among the semantic fields in which BPMs are used, fewer are found in the description of temperament than in the labelling of emotions. The reason for this is almost certainly that temperament, like body shape (§11.2), is fairly stable through adulthood, and stable qualities tend to be labelled by single words. Emotions and desires, on the other hand, are essentially changeable, and are often described metaphorically. The boundary between temperament terms and emotion terms, however, is fuzzy. Saying that someone is brave may refer to someone’s temperament or to their current behaviour. In the latter case a BPM is expected, so that a BPM like POc *qate- (p,pʷ)atu(k) [liver- strong/firm] ‘brave’ (§11.3.2.1) was basically an expression used of someone’s immediate behaviour that was also extended to a stable propensity of temperament.

2. Properties of the human body⇫

2.1. Stature: tall vs short⇫

Languages vary as to whether or not they lexicalise a distinction between horizontal and vertical length. English does so by distinguishing between horizontal long and vertical tall, but the antonym of both terms is short. German and French equate vertical length, at least in its application to human beings, with size: German groβ, French grand ‘big, tall’ vs German klein, French petit ‘small, short in stature’.

Oceanic languages mostly agree in making no distinction between horizontal and vertical length. The term for ‘long’ also means ‘tall’ and the term for ‘short’ has both horizontal and vertical application. Both apply to the stature of human beings. The relevant terms are reconstructed in vol.2(197–199). In no Oceanic language for which data are available is human stature equated with size (§11.2.2).

2.2. Size: big vs small⇫

It follows from the last statement that terms with the general meaning ‘big’ (POc *lapuat) and ‘small’ (POc *qitik, *riki(t,q)), reconstructed in vol.2(191–196), do not denote stature when they refer to human beings. To assert that someone is ‘big’ is typically to say that this person has social prestige, and this was probably also true in POc. The nature of that prestige depends on community structure. In chiefly societies, a ‘big’ man is a chieftain.

POc *lapuat ‘big, large; chief’
Adm Mussau lapa-n ‘important person, chief’
Adm Baluan lapa-n ‘chief; excellent’ (Schokkin 2014)
Adm Titan lápa-n ‘leader, chief’
Adm Nyindrou laba-n ‘leader, chief’
Adm Papitalai laba-n ‘chief’
MM Mono-Alu la-lafa ‘chief’
PEOc *qa-lapʷa ‘chief’
SES Lau alafa ‘chief’
SES ’Are’are a-raha ‘chief’
SES Arosi a-raha ‘chief’
cf. also:
MM Tinputz abuh ‘big, huge; chief’

In non-chiefly societies a ‘big’ man is an important person, perhaps by virtue of leadership qualities, perhaps by virtue of accrued wealth.

Adm Titan manr̃ean ‘big; important’
NNG Takia tubun ‘big; important’
NNG Mangseng pom ‘big; important, prestigious’
NNG Numbami bamo ‘big, large; elder’
NNG Hote bɛŋ ‘big; deep; thick; wide; important’
NNG Patep lɛvaʔ ‘big; important’
PT Dobu sinabʷa-na ‘big, large; important’
PT Iduna lakahi-na ‘big; “big” man’
PT Sinaugoro barego ‘big; important’
MM Nakanai uru ‘big; senior; important’
MM Nehan uleiki ‘big, large; important’
MM Roviana ululu-na ‘big; important man’
SES To’aba’ita baʔita ‘big; important’
SES ’Are’are paina ‘big, large, great, loud; (man) in authority’
NCV Paamese marīte ‘big; important’
NCV Paamese heitamen ‘big; important’
NCV Lewo keviu ‘big; important’

A secondary but much less frequent association of ‘big’ is with age: ‘big’ equates with ‘older’.

‘Small’ in Oceanic languages is the antonym of ‘big’ with regard to size, but not in its extended meanings. The expected antonym of ‘chiefly, important’ would be ‘socially inferior’, but this usage appears to be very rare. Instead, ‘small’ seems far more frequently used of a child, that is, with regard to age. However, it is difficult to be sure about this, because a gloss like ‘young, small’ does not tell us that the word is used for small objects in general, as the translator may simply have ‘young child, small child’ in mind.

2.3. Girth: fat vs thin⇫

Oceanic languages typically distinguish between (a) the girth (circumferential thickness) of both human beings (English fat or stout) and non-human objects (e.g. a thick stem) and (b) the thickness of something with a flat surface, like paper, or the depth of a large body of water.

Two terms reconstructed for ‘thick’ in vol.2(201–202) concern us here, POc *ma-tolu and POc *[tubu]tubu[ka]. Glosses that disambiguate the meaning of *ma-tolu point in just one instance (Manam) to girth and in a majority of cases to the thickness of something flat, and it is reasonable to infer that this was its central POc sense.

POc *ma-tolu ‘thick (of flat objects)’ (vol.2:201–203)
NNG Manam ma-toli ‘fat’
NCV Mota ma-tol-tol ‘thick, thick-skinned, callous; broad, thick (of speech)’
NCV Paamese ma-te-tel ‘thick; deep’
SV Anejom̃ a-m-esej ‘thick (of flat object)’
Mic Kosraean mæ-tol ‘thick, dense’
Mic Chuukese ma-aɾɨ̄ɾ ‘be thick (of flat objects)’
Mic Puluwatese ma-aliyə̄l ‘be thick (as paper), thickness’
Mic Woleaian ma-alʉyelʉ ‘be thick, close packed, dense’
Pn Ifira-Mele mā-toru ‘thick (of board etc.)’
Pn Rarotongan mā-toru ‘thick through, stout and solid’
Pn Rennellese mā-togu ‘thick, as a knife or a mat, crowded’

The POc term for a large girth was *[tubu]tubu[ka], reconstructed in vol.2:202.1 Additional reflexes have been found, and we give the cognate set as it now stands.

POc *[tubu]tubu[ka] ‘thick (in dimension); fat (of vegetable, fruit, human being)’ (vol.2:202)
NNG Yabem tʊp ‘grow fat’
NNG Sio tuᵐbu ‘fat; gain weight’
NNG Numbami -tuᵐbu ‘grow, get fatter’
MM Patpatar tubu ‘fat’
MM Ramoaaina tubu ‘fat ; wide ; thick’
MM Ramoaaina tubu-tubu ‘very fat’
MM Tolai tubu ‘thick (in dimension)’
SES Lau ūbu-ūbu-a ‘thick, fleshy, in good condition’
SES Kwaio ubu-ubu ‘thick’
SES Arosi ubu-ubu-ʔa ‘thick’
SES Santa Ana upu-pu-ɣa ‘thick’
Fij Bauan tubu ‘grow or increase in size’
cf. also:
PT Misima tabʷa ‘grow well; (be) fat’

The term reconstructed for ‘thin’ in vol.2(202–203) is POc *manipis. Below are listed reflexes with disambiguating glosses, and it is clear that *manipis is the antonym of *matolu ‘thick (of flat objects)’ and thus not a term applied to human beings.

PAn *[ma]Lipis ‘thin’ (vol.2:202–203)
POc *manipis ‘thin (of flat objects), flimsy’
SES Owa manifi ‘thin and transparent’
NCV Mota mavin-vin ‘thin; of speech, sharp (antonym of matoltol)’ (metathesis)
NCV Ambae manivi-nivi ‘thin, shallow, low tide’
NCV Lewo mani-nivi ‘thin; shallow’
NCV Nguna manive-nive ‘thin (of an object, e.g. cloth, paper, sides of canoe etc)’
Mic Marshallese maniy ‘thin, flimsy’
Mic Ponapean mɛnipi-nip ‘thin (of flat objects such as paper)’

The data make it clear that Oceanic languages have a distinct term or terms for people who are thin/scawny/skinny, but no cognate set reflecting a POc term with this meaning has been reconstructed. Clark (2009) reconstructs a PNCV term that evidently had this sense.

PNCV *magura ‘thin, lean’ (Clark 2009)
NCV Raga magura ‘thin’
NCV Uripiv -mak-mak ‘be thin’
NCV Port Sandwich maᵑgü ‘thin’
NCV Lewo maula ‘thin, bony’
NCV Namakir mʷagir ‘thin’
NCV Nguna mʷagura ‘thin, lean, slim (person), lean (meat)’

2.4. Strength: strong vs weak⇫

Oceanic terms for ‘strong’ tend also to mean ‘hard’. One POc term for ‘strong, hard’ was *toRas, reconstructed in vol.3(200–201) with the sense ‘a taxon of hardwood trees including Intsia bijuga’, where it is also noted that the POc term meant ‘hard, durable’. There is no evidence, though, that this term denoted human strength.

The three terms below, POc *kayu-kayu, PROc *[kayu]kayu-a and PEOc *kaila ‘strong, firm’ appear to be derived from the generic term for tree, POc *kayu (vol.3:71–73), used metaphorically for strength and hardness. However, this seemingly obvious derivation is a little problematic. If the reflexes of these three terms are compared with the terms for tree in the same languages, differences emerge. The *kayu-like terms for ‘strong, firm’ have a fortis initial k-, whilst in languages that have a fortis/lenis distinction2 the term for ‘tree’ has a lenis initial ɣ- (Bugotu, W Guadalcanal, Woleaian) or zero (Labu, Paamese). This appears to be evidence against the hypothesis that these terms are derived from *kayu. However, the history of the fortis/lenis distinction is not well understood, and in favour of the hypothesis is that POc *kayu-kayu and *[kayu]kayu-a were both formed from *kayu by two early Oceanic adjective-forming strategies. The first was CVCV- reduplication, giving POc *kayu-kayu ‘strong, tough, inflexible’ (vol.2:206–220). The second was the addition of *-[k]a to a noun (Ross 2000), giving *[kayu]kayu-a. The fortis/lenis and other formal discrepancies can perhaps be explained by assuming that speakers’ association of ‘strong, firm’ with ‘tree’ was lost in some languages, and as a result the root of the ‘strong’ term and the reflex of *kayu have undergone different phonological developments.

PEOc *kaila ‘strong, firm’ has a similar set of meanings, and was presumably also derived from *kayu, but the derivational mechanism has not been recorded in other terms.

POc *kayu-kayu ‘strong, tough, inflexible’
NNG Manam kaikai ‘strong’ (kai ‘tree; strong’)
NNG Mangap -keke ‘stiff, strong, inflexible, proud, unwilling to serve’ (ke ‘tree’)
NNG Sio kaika ‘strong’ (kɔe ‘tree’)
NNG Labu ka-ka ‘hard’ (a ‘tree’)
PT Muyuw kei-kay ‘hard, difficult’ (kay ‘tree’)
SES Bugotu ka-kai ‘firm, steady, faithful’ (ɣai ‘tree’)
SES West Guadalcanal ka-kai ‘strong’ (ɣai ‘tree’)
Fij Wayan kai ‘wood, tree; strong, tough, powerful’
Fij Wayan kai-kai ‘hard, firm, rigid, stiff’

PROc *[kayu]kayu-a ‘strong’ (Clark 2009: PNCV)
NCV Nokuku (mel)kɔu ‘strong’ (kɔu ‘tree’)
NCV Tolomako ɣau-ɣau-a ‘strong’
NCV Unua -xaiv ‘hard, difficult, solid, strong, firm’
NCV Maskelynes xai-xai ‘strong’
NCV Paamese keiho ‘strong’ (a-ai ‘tree’)
NCV Lewo kawa ‘strong; adult’ (la-ki ‘tree. stick, wood’)
NCV Nguna kasua ‘strong, hard, difficult, loud’ (na-kau ‘tree’)
Fij Bauan kau-kau-a ‘strong, hard’ (kau ‘tree’)
Pn Tongan kau-kau-a ‘strong, sturdy, burly’ (kau ‘stalk, stem’)

It is possible that Seimat [Adm] aila-n in the BPM patu ailan ‘he is obstinate’ means ‘hard, strong’. If so, then PEOc *kaila is elevated to POc status.

PEOc *kaila ‘strong, firm’
SES Sa’a aʔaila-ʔa ‘firm, strong’ (ʔai ‘tree’)
SES Arosi ʔaʔaira[ʔa] ‘strong, firm’ (ʔai ‘tree’)
PMic *kaila ‘strong’
Mic Kiribati kaina(matoa) ‘implacable’ (te-kaina ‘pandanus tree’)
Mic Woleaian kkaile ‘strong, healthy’ (xaai ‘tree’)
Mic Ponapean kɛ̄l ‘strength’
Mic Ponapean kɛ̄l ayl ‘strong, healthy, powerful’ (< PMic *kailaila)
Mic Pingelapese kēl ‘strength’ (suhkae ‘tree’)
Mic Puluwatese kkel ‘strong’ (yéé ‘house beam < POc *kayu ‘tree’)
cf. also:
NCV Araki ɣau-ra ‘hard, solid; difficult, arduous, tough’ (< *kayu-ta; cf. ɣa ‘tree’)

A further term for ‘hard, strong, firm’ is POc *(p,pʷ)atuatu ‘hard, strong, firm’, again an adjective formed by reduplication of a noun. The noun was *(p,pʷ)atu ‘outer shell, skull’ (Ch:- bodyparts, §4.2.1).

POc *[(p,pʷ)atu](p,pʷ)atu ‘hard, strong, firm’
NNG Takia pat-pat ‘strong, hard’
PT Dobu patu-patu ‘hard, of fat, sago’
PT Minaveha vatu- ‘strong, hard ??’3
SES Bugotu patu ‘hard, firm, taut’
SES Gela patu ‘hard, to make firm’
SES ’Are’are pau-pau ‘hard’

Two terms with an implication of human strength, both reconstructed by Blust (ACD), are recorded in vol.2(214): POc *paka(s) ‘have energy, strength’ and POc *laga(s) ‘spirited, energetic’.

Weak has at least two related senses in English when it is applied to human beings: ‘temporarily weak as a result of tiredness, sickness or hunger’ and ‘constitutionally weak’. It is the latter which relevant here. Just as ‘strong’ is associated with ‘hard’ in Oceanic languages, so ‘weak’ is associated with ’soft’. POc *[ma]lumu ‘soft, gentle, easy’ is reconstructed in vol.2(215). In its application to people, this term seems to have had two senses: with reference to the body, ‘constitutionally weak’, and with reference to temperament ‘gentle, easygoing’ (§11.3.1.1). In the listing below ‘weak’ is shown in bold when it occurs in a gloss.

PMP *[ma]lumu ‘soft, tender, gentle’ (ACD)
POc *[ma]lumu ‘soft (of objects); gentle, easygoing; (constitutionally) weak’ (vol.2:215)
NNG Bariai marum ‘soft, weak’
NNG Bukawa malʊ ‘peaceful’
NNG Yabem malʊ ‘calm, peaceful, good-natured’
PT Muyuw manum ‘gently’
MM Tinputz mamarum ‘weak (in body)’
SES Sa’a malumu ‘soft, gentle’
PNCV *ma-lumu ‘soft, gentle, weak’ (Clark 2009)
NCV Mota malum-lum ‘soft, gentle’
NCV Nokuku melum ‘soft, slow, weak’
NCV Araki m̫alum ‘quiet, slow, weak’
NCV South Efate mailum-lum ‘quiet, slow; soft, weak’
Fij Bauan malumu ‘weak, faint, sick, soft’
Fij Wayan malum ‘weak, feeble (of a living thing)’
Pn Niuean molū ‘soft, humble, weak,’
Pn Samoan malū ‘soft, calm of sea, gentle’
Pn Tahitian marū ‘soft, gentle, easy’

3. Properties of the human temperament⇫

Whilst Oceanic languages certainly have terms, some of them BPMs, for human propensities, many of these terms may refer to both temporary and permanent states. It is the permanent states that are properties of temperament, and some languages have a construction that encodes these. There is, however, no POc construction that can be reconstructed with this function.

Iduna, like a number of other Papuan Tip languages, makes copious use of to- ‘person who…’ (from POc *tau-; §2.2.1.2) in expressions like the following, where the item compounded with to-, typically a verb, encodes a quality construed as permanent.

PT Iduna to-selakalaka ‘boaster, arrogant person’ (-selakalaka ‘boast, brag, be proud’)
PT Iduna to-siveyawa ‘healer’ (siveyawa ‘healing’)
PT Iduna to-taɣa-kʷeu ‘deaf person’ (taɣa ‘ear’; -kʷeu ??)
PT Iduna to-talahaɣi ‘person at enmity with s.o., not speaking to, eating with or visiting them’ (-talahaɣi ‘repudiate, hate, have nothing to do with s.o.’)
PT Iduna to-tubukoyo ‘cripple’ (-tubukoyo ‘develop badly, not grow well’)
PT Iduna to-tunutunuɣina ‘upright, honest person’ (tunutunuɣina ‘straight, upright, righteous, honest’)
PT Iduna to-nu-beʔu-beʔu ‘lame person’ (beʔu ‘fall down’)

In a number of these compounds the stem is itself a BPM formed with nua ‘think; mind’.

PT Iduna to-nua-doɣa ‘kind, generous person’ (nuanua-wadoɣa-na ‘gracious, generous’)
PT Iduna to-nua-hobu ‘humble person’ (-nua-hobu ‘be humble’; -hobu ‘go down’)
PT Iduna to-nua-huya ‘intelligent person, educated, wise, literate’ (nua-huya ‘wisdom, skill, knowledge’)
PT Iduna to-nua-kabubu ‘kind, loving person’ (nua-kabubu ‘love, blessing, favour’)
PT Iduna to-nua-lolona ‘miser, ungenerous person’ (-nua-lolona ‘withhold (food, possessions)’)
PT Iduna to-nua-luɣa ‘double-minded person’ (-nua-luɣa ‘indecisive’; §10.8)
PT Iduna to-nua-sivebala ‘agitator’ (-sivebalana ‘deter, prevent from going or doing, hold back’)
PT Iduna to-nua-vita ‘downcast, depressed person’ (-vita ‘heavy’)

Motu (PT) forms compound lexemes in a semantically parallel manner, but the attribute precedes tau-na, composed of tau ‘person’ and -na ‘its’. The attribute takes the prefix he-, indicating a state, condition or habit. he-abidae tau-na ‘a hospitable man’ (he-abidae ‘show hospitality’)

PT Motu he-aɣi tau-na ‘a braggart, conceited man’ (he-aɣi ‘boast’)
PT Motu he-ani tau-na ‘a cannibal’ (ani ‘eat’)
PT Motu he-atotau tau-na ‘one who pays another to betray, kill or save another’ (he-atotau ‘be held down by s.t. placed on top’)
PT Motu he-boɣahisi tau-na ‘a compassionate, merciful person’ (he-boɣa-hisi [he-belly-pain] ‘pity, compassion’)
PT Motu he-ɣame tau-na ‘beggar’ (heɣame ‘beg’)

Although constructions reflecting POc *tau- ‘person who’ are widespread among Papuan Tip languages, there is little evidence that the construction was used for properties of temperament in POc. Instead, as noted in §2.2.1.2, the POc construction was used to denote people with skill in a particular occupation and sometimes people of a certain place or clan. A check of reflexes in Mussau (Adm), Nakanai and Teop (MM), Woleaian and Carolinian (Mic) and various Polynesian languages suggests that the extension of the construction to denote temperamental qualities was restricted to PT.

Several languages have a noun that is used with the sense ‘disposition, way of acting, habit’ and is modified by an adjective or stative verb to form a complex lexeme denoting a property of temperament.

Seimat (Adm) has such a term, oŋa ‘temperament or disposition’.

Adm Seimat oŋa- solia-n [disposition good] ‘amiable’
Adm Seimat oŋa- kalimen [disposition bad, terrible, dreadful] ‘greedy, self-centred, miserly, infamous, inhospitable’
Adm Seimat oŋa- ewii [disposition nice, calm] ‘benevolent, generous, hospitable’
Adm Seimat oŋa- lialun [disposition bad] ‘inhospitable’

Tongan aŋa reflects the PPn term *aŋa with widespread reflexes outside eastern Polynesia that are used in this way. Its resemblance to Seimat oŋa may be a matter of chance. Tongan in particular has hundreds of complex lexemes formed with aŋa ‘character, habit, nature’. A brief selection is given:

Pn Tongan aŋa malū ‘gentle, amiable’ (malū ‘calm of sea’)
Pn Tongan aŋa sauni ‘vindictive’ (sauni ‘to avenge’)
Pn Tongan aŋa maka ‘stubborn, obstinate’ (maka ‘stone’)
Pn Tongan aŋa hiki ‘proud, overbearing’ (hiki ‘to lift, raise’)
Pn Tongan aŋa foaki ‘generous’ (foaki ‘donate, bestow’)
PPn *aŋa ‘habit, custom, way of acting’ (POLLEX)
Pn Tongan aŋa ‘character, habit, nature’
Pn Niuean aŋa ‘habit, custom, behaviour’
Pn Samoan aŋa ‘conduct, way of acting’
Pn Tokelauan aŋa ‘habit, custom’
Pn Tuvalu aŋa ‘custom, way of acting’
Pn East Futunan aŋa ‘conduct, custom, usage, habit’
Pn East Uvean aŋa ‘nature, custom, usage’
Pn Tikopia aŋa ‘incline towards; inclination, orientation’
cf. also:
Fij Rotuman aŋa ‘usage, custom’ (Pn borrowing)

In Tongan aŋa stands in contrast with loto ‘insides’ (< PPn *loto; vol.2:239). Where aŋa denotes a permanent feature of temperament, e.g. aŋa fiemālie ‘of contented and easy-going disposition’, loto denotes a transient emotion, e.g. loto fiemālie ‘contented, satisfied’.

In Wayan Fijian alo- ‘soul’ is similarly used for temperamental features as shown in the following examples, whilst the corresponding transient emotions are denoted by simple adjectives.

Fij Wayan alo-kasa ‘quick to learn, intelligent, having an absorbent mind’ (kasa ‘learned’)
Fij Wayan alo-kaikai, alo-qwāqwā ‘determined, strong-willed, brave, stubborn, aggressive’ (kaikai, qwāqwā ‘strong’)
Fij Wayan alo-malumalum ‘gentle, good-tempered, of quiet disposition’ (malumalum ‘soft, ripe’)
Fij Wayan alo-sewasewa ‘frightened, intimidated, lacking courage’ (sewasewa ‘tiny’)
Fij Wayan alo-vinā ‘kind, kind-hearted’ (vinā ‘good’)
Fij Wayan alo-vou ‘young in spirit, young at heart’ (vou ‘new, fresh’)
Fij Wayan alo-wai ‘moody, subject to changes in mood’ (wai ‘water’)
Fij Wayan alo-vaka-tāŋʷane ‘manly, courageous’ (vaka-tāŋʷane ‘like a man’)

Similar expressions occur in Bauan Fijian with the cognate term yalo- ‘soul, spirit, disposition’, e.g. yalo mālua ‘meek, lowly’ (mālua ‘quiet, gentle’), yalo vinaka ‘kind-hearted’ (vinaka ‘good’).

The examples collected from Iduna, Motu, Seimat, Fijian and Tongan show how each of these languages has devised a way to describe temperamental qualities, using a modifier with either a term like Tongan aŋa ‘character, habit, nature’ or a reflex of the POc construction with *tau… ‘person who’.

Modifiers that describe features of temperament are reconstructed in the sections below, but this appears to be an unstable semantic field, presumably because of the tendency to invent new metaphors to describe behaviour and temperament. As a result, few terms are reconstructable.

3.1. Tame vs untamed⇫

3.1.1. Tame, accustomed to⇫

POc evidently inherited a pair of terms meaning ‘tame, docile, trained, well behaved’ that were applied both to animals and human beings. The pair were *laca(m) and *ma-naca(m). Pairs of property terms with the same root were apparently quite common in POc, one unprefixed, the other with either *ka- or *ma-, prefixes that often occur on stative verbs, both originating in the stative prefix *ka- (Zeitoun & Huang 2000:298). The seeming oddity about this pair is that the POc bare root had initial *l-. the prefixed root initial *n-. However, this is readily accounted for if the PAn root had initial *L-,4 which regularly became PMP *l- initially but *-n- medially. Thus PAn *Lajam became PMP *lajam and POc *laca(m), whilst PAn *ma-Lajam regularly became PMP *ma-najam and POc *ma-naca(m).

PAn *Lajam ‘accustomed to, tame’ (ACD)
PMP *lajam ‘accustomed to, tame’
POc *laca(m) ‘tame, docile, trained, well behaved’
MM Sursurunga las ‘tame, used to, get used to’
MM Tolai lā ‘tame, domesticated (of animals), accustomed, acclimatised’
PCP *laca ‘tame’ (Geraghty 1983)
Fij Bauan lasa ‘easy, contented, tame, accustomed’
Pn Tongan lata ‘feel at home or at ease, be comfortable, happy, contented’
Pn Tikopia rata ‘fix affections on; tame’
Pn Hawaiian laka ‘tame, domesticated, gentle’; [VT] ‘tame, domesticate’

POc *ma-naca(m) underwent an extension in meaning whereby ‘trained’ became ‘knowledgeable’ and then ‘know, understand, think about’, and as a nominal ‘knowledge, understanding, mind’. This extension is discussed in §10.3. Reflexes below are restricted to the ‘tame’ etc senses.

PAn *ma-Lajam ‘tame, accustomed to’ (ACD)
PMP *ma-najam ‘tame, accustomed to’
POc *ma-nacam [VI] ‘tame, docile, trained, well behaved; know, understand, think about’; [N] ‘knowledge, understanding, thought, wisdom’
NNG Gedaged mana-n ‘tame, docile (mostly of animals), peaceful, obedient, trained’
PT Tawala malagama ‘tame’; [N] ‘experience’ (-l- for †-n-)
PT Sinaugoro marana ‘tame, gentle’ (metathesis of *-c- and *-n-)
PT Motu manada ‘even, smooth, gentle’
MM Nehan mahanama ‘tame, unafraid’ (metathesis of *-c- and *-n-)
PSES *manasa ‘tame’
SES Gela manaha [VT] ‘tame’
SES Arosi manata ‘tame, trained, gentle, of man or animal’
SES Sa’a manata [VI] ‘be taught; quiet of animals, tame’
SES Lau manata ‘quiet, tame’
SES ’Are’are manata ‘behave oneself; tame of birds and animals’
SES Owa manata ‘tame’

It is tempting to try to relate the items below to *ma-nacam above, but they evidently reflect a different (PWOc) etymon.

PWOc *ma-napas ‘tame (of animals); quiet, domesticated (of people)’
PT Iduna manava ‘become tame (of wild animals); soft, pliable’
PT Iduna (ve)manav(ina) [VT] ‘tame, of wild animals’ (ve- ‘cause, make’, manavina ‘soft, pliable’)
MM Nduke manavasa ‘tame’
MM Roviana manavasa ‘tame, subdued, at home, be used to’

It is reasonably clear from the glosses of the sets above that these terms referred to a temperamental quality for which there is no single English term. It describes a person who is domesticated, gentle and quietly spoken, and content with their lot. This quality was apparently positively valued. If it were otherwise, the glosses would almost certainly register the negativity.

POc *[ma]lumu ‘soft (of objects); gentle, easygoing; (constitutionally) weak’, reconstructed in vol.2(215) as a property of inanimate objects, is applied in various Oceanic languages to the human temperament with a sense resembling that of the items above, and this extension may well have occurred in POc. It was evidently also applied to the body in the sense of ‘constitutionally weak’, and the cognate set is listed in §11.2.4.

There is also evidence of a BPM containing this term.

SES Arosi (ahu)marumu(ʔa) [belly gentle] ‘be sweet, gracious, gentle’
NCV Mota lolo-malumlum [insides-gentle] ‘sort-hearted, of an easy mild temper; gently’
NCV Nokuku lol-melum [insides gentle] ‘meek’
Fij Bauan (yalo) mālua [soul gentle] ‘meek, lowly’
Fij Wayan (alo) malu-malum ‘gentle, good-tempered, of quiet disposition’
Pn Pukapukan (yau)mālū [temperament gentle] ‘meek’

In NCV, at least, the POc weather term *ma-drapu ‘still, calm, windless’ (vol.2:136) also has human application.

PNCV *madau ‘quiet, gentle’ (Clark 2009)
NCV Raga marou ‘quiet, listless’
NCV Southeast Ambrym merou ‘calm, quiet, peaceful, sober’
NCV Port Sandwich maⁿdrao ‘be quiet, do gently’
NCV Paamese merau ‘weak; soft; do softly; do gently’
NCV Valpei marav ‘weak’

3.1.2. Untamed, wild⇫

As POc reconstructions for ‘tame, accustomed to’ refer to a kind of domesticated amiability, so terms glossed ‘wild’ similarly refer to the behaviour often associated with undomesticated animals, i.e. ‘savage’, ‘fierce’. In places, terms may also be applied to the rainforest and to normally cultivated plants that have self-sown outside the gardens. While terms for ‘tame’ are also used to denote a human temperamental quality, it is less clear that this is true of POc *wasi.

POc *wasi ‘wild, untamed’
PT Gumawana woiwoi ‘wild’ (animals)
PT Tawala yahi-yahi ‘untamed, wild, dangerous’ (y- for †w-)
PT Kuni aci ‘wild’ (∅- for †w-)
PT North Mekeo aki ‘wild’ (∅- for †w-)
PT West Mekeo aji ‘wild’ (∅- for †w-)
MM Maringe asi [VI] ‘run wild, go astray’
SES Bugotu asi ‘wild (of animals), fierce’
SES Gela asi ‘wild (of animals or forest)’
SES Longgu wasi ‘wild, undomesticated’
SES To’aba’ita kʷasi [VI] ‘(of animals), be wild, not domestic, (of plants) grow wild’
SES Lau kʷasi ‘wild, of animals or plants’
SES Kwaio kʷasi ‘wild, untamed’
SES Arosi wasi-wasi ‘wild, of any animal’
SES Sa’a wasi [VI] ‘wild, not tame’
SES ’Are’are wasi ‘wild, untamed’
SES Owa wasi ‘wild, untamed’
cf. also:
NNG Takia kasik ‘wild’
PT Kilivila gasisi ‘wild, savage’

3.2. Brave vs cowardly⇫

3.2.1. Brave, courageous⇫

Bravery is commonly expressed as a body-part metaphor (BPM) based on the liver or belly, with a modifying term apparently reflecting POc *(p,pʷ)atuatu ‘hard, strong, firm’, the latter derived from *(p,pʷ)atu(k) ‘outer shell, skull’ (§3.4.2). Hence we can tentatively reconstruct a POc BPM *qate- (p,pʷ)atu [liver- hard/strong] ‘brave’. In the languages of the set below, reflexes of *(p,pʷ)atu also function as a stative verb ‘firm, strong’. Reflexes of (p,pʷ)atu are formally and semantically similar to *patu ‘stone’ (vol.2:62), but in POc were distinct from it (§3.4.2.1). In Kwaio, however, which does not have a reflex of *(p,pʷ)atu, the fou of lae-fou ‘brave’ is the term for ‘stone’. One may infer that the Kwaio term is a reflex of *qate- (p,pʷ)atu which with the loss of a reflex of *(p,pʷ)atu has been reinterpreted as if it reflected *qate- patu [liver- stone]. Something similar has occurred in Gumawana and Iduna, where the modifying term taken alone has a meaning other than ‘firm, strong’.

Why not infer that *patu ‘stone’ occurred in the POc term and that all BPMs below reflect *qate- patu? Because POc *patu ‘stone’ would be reflected as Gumawana †vatu, Dobu †atu, Bunama †hatu, but these terms do not occur at all (Gela vatu ‘stone’ does occur). The morpheme patu in their BPMs thus probably reflects (p,pʷ)atu (cf. Dobu patu (VI) ‘harden, set’).

POc *qate-(p,pʷ)atu ‘brave’
PT Dobu ʔate-patu [liver hard] ‘brave, bold’
PT Bunama ʔate-patu [liver strong/firm] ‘courage, brave, confidence’
PT Minaveha ate vatu [liver strong/firm] ‘brave’
SES Gela lio-patu [heart-hard] ‘daring, brave’
cf. also:
PT Gumawana ate- i-patu ‘brave’
PT Iduna ase-vatu ‘courage, boldness’
PT Iduna ase-ʔase-vatu- ‘brave, courageous, ungenerous.’
SES Kwaio lae-fou ‘brave, unashamed’

A construal of bravery as strength or hardness — the two are typically encoded by a single lexical item in languages of Melanesia — of the seat of the emotions is widespread.

NNG Takia ilo- dabai [insides- strong] ‘confident, courageous, strong in character’
NNG Takia tini- dabai [body- strong] ‘confident, courageous, strong in character’
PT Motu boga auka [belly/liver hard] ‘brave’
NCV Lonwolwol bɛ-k mə-təte [insides-my it-strong] ‘I feel strong, energetic, courageous’
NCV Lonwolwol ja təte [body strong] ‘courageous’
NCV South Efate kerkerai ‘strong, hard, brave’
Mic Marshallese pen pɯruo- [firm/strong/hard heart-] ‘brave’
Fij Bauan yate dei [liver firm/unwavering ] ‘brave’
Fij Wayan ate dei [liver firm] ‘brave’
Fij Wayan alo kaikai [soul strong/hard] ‘determined, strong-willed, brave, stubborn, aggressive’

3.2.2. Cowardly, timid⇫

Relatively few Oceanic dictionaries have an entry for ‘cowardly’. Terms found tend to reflect *matakut ‘fear’ (§11.4.1), as the examples below suggest.

PT Dobu mata-matauta ‘cowardly’
SES Gela matagu-pou ‘coward’
NCV Southeast Ambrym metau ‘cowardly, timid’
NCV Paamese tā-metau ‘coward’
SV Anejom̃ e-mtac ‘fear; be afraid, fearful, cowardly’
Fij Bauan mata-mataku ‘be always afraid, timid, cowardly’

We have three reflexes of the BPM *qate- lapuat [liver big]. Oddly, this metaphor has the reverse meaning of that proposed by Blust for PMP where [big liver] stands for ‘brave, proud, arrogant’ (see §9.6).

NCV Mota vara-lava [liver large] ‘one who is easily frightened, makes much of nothing’
Fij Bauan yate levu [liver large] ‘cowardly’
Fij Wayan ate levu [liver large] ‘cowardly’

Marshallese has eccelok acin [without liver] ‘he is not brave’.

3.3. Obstinate, stubborn⇫

A rather widespread BPM for ‘obstinate, stubborn’ has a modifier of the same meaning as the BPM for ‘brave, courageous’ (§11.3.2.1) namely ‘strong/firm’, but a different body-part. POc *qate- ‘liver’ was evidently used in the BPM for ‘brave’. The evidence of Admiralties and NCV languages below suggests that *qate- was replaced by *bʷatu(k) ‘head’ (§3.4.2) in the BPM for ‘obstinate’. This may be a further illustration of the hypothesis that more physically expressed qualities such as ‘brave’ form a BPM with *qate-, while mental states do not (§9.4). Instead of *lalo-, however, in this case the more specific *bʷatu(k) occurs. Clark (2009) reconstructs a BPM here, PNCV *bʷatu kayua [head strong] ‘wilful, stubborn’, reflected by the Big Nambas and Paamese terms below.

Adm Seimat patu ailan [head hard/strong] ‘he is obstinate’
Adm Nyindrou batun boto-on [head hard/strong] ‘stubborn’
NNG Takia ilo patpat [insides hard/strong] ‘hard-headed, strong-minded, wilful’
NNG Takia bube- sakar [liver- hard] ‘hard hearted, stubborn, uncompassionate’
NNG Mapos Buang yu niggɔχ [head strong] ‘stubborn’
PT Kilivila i-minimani daba-la [it-tough/strong head-his] ‘he is stubborn’
SES Gela lio vatu [insides stone] ‘obstinacy; stubbornness’
NCV Mwotlap pʷet-maymay [head hard] ‘stubborn’
NCV Big Nambas pt-hua ‘stubborn’
NCV Paamese vati-keiho ‘person who is determined and inconsiderate of the feelings of others’
SV Sye -oŋkoŋko ‘hard, strong, stubborn’
SV Lenakel nɨkii- r-ausɨk-ausɨk [heart- it-REDUP-strong/hard] ‘stubborn’

Another BPM with scattered WOc occurrences is ‘ear blocked’.

NNG Mutu taliŋa- zizi [ear- blocked] ‘stubborn’
NNG Mangap talŋa- ŋuŋun ‘stubborn’
NNG Bariai taŋa- balbal [ear ??] ‘obstinate, stubborn’
PT Iduna taɣa- -kulu [ear blocked] ‘(X is) obstinate, deaf to instruction’
PT Iduna taɣa-kulu ‘obstinacy’
PT Iduna taɣa-taɣa-kulu-na ‘obstinate’

3.4. Ignorant vs wise and stupid vs intelligent⇫

3.4.1. Ignorant, stupid⇫

In Eastern Oceanic languages ignorance is sometimes expressed by a BPM [mind dark], a complex lexeme that also means ‘forget’ in some EOc languages (§10.6). In some languages this BPM has both senses. Again, the terms for ‘night’ reflect either POc *rodrom ‘be dark, be night’ or POc *boŋi ‘night’ (vol.2:295–298).

SES Lau lio ro-rodoa [mind dark] ‘ignorant, puzzled’
NCV Mota lolo-pʷoŋ [inside-night] ‘ignorant, stupid, unenlightened; forget’
NCV Mwotlap lɔl-pʷoŋ [inside-night] [VT] ‘forget, ignorant’
NCV Nokuku lolo- ōra [inside- night] ‘forget, ignorant’
Mic Kiribati nano-ro [insides dark] ‘ignorant, uncultured’

Sometimes a verb ‘be dark’ is used alone as a metaphor for ‘ignorant’.

SES To’aba’ita rō-rodoʔa ‘be dark (of a place); be ignorant about (of a person)’ (rodo ‘night, be dark’)
Fij Wayan ŋīŋīlō ‘dull, poor in light; get dark; be dusk, nightfall; ignorant, lacking in knowledge or wisdom’

Oceanic languages tend to have a term which means ‘mentally impaired’ and translates, depending on context, as ‘ignorant’, ‘stupid’, ‘foolish, silly’ or ‘mad, crazy, insane’. They reflect a number of POc terms which must have different shades of meaning that are now lost to us.

POc *kila has only one Oceanic reflex, and it is a reasonable inference that it disappeared early across much of Oceanic because the merger of PMP *g and *k rendered Oceanic reflexes similar to those of POc (VI) *kilala ‘know’, from PMP *kilala, with the opposite meaning.

PMP *gila ‘wild; insane’ (ACD)
POc *kila ‘ignorant’ (?)
NNG Kaulong kila ‘ignorant of, unfamiliar with (s.o., s.t.)’

The presence of reflexes of POc *[ŋa(q)u]ŋa(q)uŋ ‘stupid, ignorant’ in an Admiralties language and a few NNG languages warrants its reconstruction. Possible medial *-q- is shown, as it allows the reconstructed form to accord with POc canonic structure, and would have been lost in each of these reflexes.

POc *[ŋa(q)u]ŋa(q)u ‘stupid, ignorant’
Adm Titan ŋow ‘crazy, silly’
NNG Manam -ŋao ‘dull, stupid’
NNG Takia -ŋao-ŋ ‘ignorant, unconscious, stupid, confused’
MM Patpatar ŋa-ŋawa ‘ignorant, confused’

The presence of medial *-p- in POc *bʷa(p)u below is unambiguously supported only by Iamalele -v-, and is contradicted by the absence of -v- in Longgu. In the other witnesses *-p- becomes zero in this context.

POc *bʷa(p)u ‘ignorant, stupid’
NNG Kairiru -pʷau ‘ignore’
PT Iamalele bavu-bavu- ‘ignorant’ (-v- for †-∅-)
MM Sursurunga bau ‘stupid, restless, uncontrollable, self-willed’
SES Longgu bʷeu ‘naughty, silly, stupid, crazy’
SV Anejom̃ a-pʷa-pʷau ‘slow-moving, unable to avoid injury, stupid, unintelligent’
PMic *pʷau-pʷau ‘silly, stupid’ (Bender et al. 2003: Proto W Micronesian *pʷai-pʷai)
Mic Marshallese pʷəypʷəy ‘crazy, silly, foolish’
Mic Ponapean pʷeypʷey ‘stupid, silly, idiotic, simple, dumb’
Mic Mokilese pʷeypʷey ‘stupid’
Mic Satawalese pʷayipʷay ‘silly, disrespectful’
POc *[bʷa]bʷaŋ ‘a fool; foolish, stupid, insane’ (ACD: *bobo ‘foolish; a fool’)
NNG Manam boaŋ [VI] ‘be insane’
NNG Manam boaŋ-boaŋ [ADJ] ‘insane’
NNG Bariai buo-buo ‘be confused about s.t.’
NNG Kaulong poŋ [VT] ‘be ignorant of, not know’
PT Tawala būa ‘fool; mad, silly’
PT Tawala bū-bua ‘foolish’
PT Dawawa bua ‘stupid, mad’
PT Sinaugoro babo ‘stupid, foolish, ignorant’
PT Motu bōbo ‘a fool’
MM Tolai bobo ‘a fool; foolish, stupid, ignorant’
MM Patpatar ba ‘crazy, retarded, foolish, worthless; good-for-nothing’
MM Tinputz babɔn ‘crazy, stupid’
SES Lau bue ‘ignorant, uncivilised, pagan, heathen’
PCP *wale ‘ignorant, unskilled, stupid, mad’
Fij Bauan wale ‘not worthwhile, very ordinary’
PPn *wale ‘mad, ignorant, unskilled’ (POLLEX)
Pn Tongan vale ‘foolish, silly, ignorant, unskilled’
Pn Tongan loto-vale ‘ignorant’ (vale ‘foolish, silly’)
Pn Tongan vale faha ‘stupid’ (faha ‘mad, insane’)
Pn Niuean vale ‘mad, ignorant, unskilled’
Pn East Futunan vale ‘mad, ignorant, unskilled’
Pn Pukapukan vale ‘be senile, lose one’s memory’
Pn Samoan vale ‘idiot; worthless’
Pn Tokelauan vale ‘idiot, fool, lunatic; mentally ill person’
Pn Tikopia vare ‘stupid, foolish, silly; trivial’
Pn Māori ware ‘ignorant, lowly, careless’

3.4.2. Wise, intelligent⇫

Despite the fact that Oceanic languages typically have a term meaning ‘intelligent, clever, wise, understanding’, it has proven impossible to reconstruct a corresponding POc term.

Occasionally a BPM [mind daylight] occurs, the antonym of [mind night] ‘ignorant’ (§11.3.4), and it is possible that there was a PNCV BPM of the form *lolo- marani [insides daylight] ‘clever, intelligent’ (reflecting POc *ma-raqani ‘be(come) light’, vol.2:318–219).

NNG Mengen lo- matana [inside- light] ‘knowledge, understanding’
SES ’Are’are pau- makata [head- bright] ‘intelligent, wise’
NCV Mota lolo-marani [mind-daylight] ‘be intelligent; remember, understand, know’
NCV Lonwolwol lo- merɛn [mind- daylight] ‘clever’

The term for ‘wise, knowledgeable’ is often derived from the verb ‘know’ (§10.2).

PT Dobu sina-sinapu- ‘wise’ (sinapu ‘understand, know’)
MM Roviana tuma-tumai ‘wise’ (tuma ‘know, understand’)
NCV Paamese kile-ile ‘educated; knowledgeable’ (kilea ‘know’)

Only for PPn has a form been reconstructed.

PPn *poto ‘wise, clever’ (POLLEX)
Pn Tongan poto ‘clever, skilled’
Pn Samoan poto ‘clever, smart, intelligent’
Pn East Futunan poto ‘clever, knowledgeable’
Pn Anutan poto ‘wise, expert’
Pn Tikopia poto ‘skilled, adept, knowledgeable’

4. Emotion expressions⇫

As discussed in chapter 9, emotions are typically described as emanating either from the liver (POc *qate), as seat of emotions and thoughts, or from a quasi-body part, POc *lalo-, *lalom ‘inside; seat of thoughts and emotions’, but other body parts sometimes occur in their place. Particular feelings are expressed as a BPM that specifies the nature of the feeling.

Although a degree of common conceptual patterns can be identified in BPMs for broadly identified emotions like happiness, sadness and anger, no reconstructions are made.

Languages closer to New Guinea seem to make the greatest use of BPMs for emotions, and languages further east use them less, petering out almost entirely in Polynesia, where the body-part component of the BPM tends to be lost and the modifying component tends to become an adjective in its own right (§3.4, §3.5, §3.8).

A small number of broadly identified emotion terms have been reconstructed as single lexemes, and we turn to these first.

4.1. Afraid⇫

Although a language will typically use numerous metaphors to describe different degrees or kinds of fear, languages from all major subgroups have reflexes of POc *matakut, probably indicating that it was the term most general in meaning. Both an intransitive and a transitive form are reconstructable. The intransitive form, *matakut, is widely reflected. The transitive form, *matakut-i-, has fewer reflexes, and it is possible that it reflects parallel innovations in various Oceanic languages. The reason for this inference is that the prefix *ma- is a stative formative that was originally incompatible with the transitive marker *-i-.

POc *matakut [(VI) ] ‘be afraid’
POc *matakut-i- [(VT) ] ‘to fear (s.t.)’
Adm Seimat ma-matau [VT] ‘fear, be afraid of’
Adm Seimat ma-mata [VI] ‘be afraid, timid’
NNG Kove mataur-i- ‘afraid’ (r reflects *R)
NNG Mengen matau, matau-e [VI, VT] ‘fear’
NNG Manam mataʔu ‘be afraid’
PT Lala makau ‘afraid, fear’
PT Molima matauta ‘afraid’ (expect mataʔuta)
PT Dobu matauta ‘afraid’
PT Saliba mataus-i- ‘be afraid’
MM Roviana mataɣutu ‘afraid, fearful’
SES Bugotu mataɣu ‘to fear, be afraid’
SES Gela mataɣu ‘to fear, be afraid’
SES Kwaio maʔu ‘afraid, shy’
SES To’aba’ita maqu [VI] ‘be afraid, fear’
SES To’aba’ita maqulā [N] ‘fear’
SES Ulawa māu ‘to fear, be afraid’
SES Arosi ma-māʔu [VI] ‘to fear’
SES Arosi māʔus-i- [VT] ‘to fear’
NCV Mota mataɣ-taɣ ‘to fear’
NCV Tamambo matahu ‘be frightened’
NCV Tirax mtaxit ‘be frightened’
NCV Nguna mataku ‘afraid’
PSV *a-metaɣ [VI] ‘be afraid, fear’ (Lynch 2001c)
SV Sye emetet [VI] ‘be afraid, fear’
Mic Carolinian mesaxu, -a [VI, VT] ‘have fear, be afraid’
Mic Woleaian metagu ‘be afraid, anxious’
Pn Rennellese mataku ‘be afraid, cowardly, fear’
Fij Wayan mataku [VI] ‘be afraid’
Fij Wayan matakuði- [VT] ‘be afraid of’
Pn Niuean mataku-taku ‘to fear, be afraid’
Pn Samoan mataʔu ‘fear, hold in awe’
Pn Pukapukan mataku [VI] ‘fear, be afraid, frightened’
Pn Tikopia mataku ‘afraid, frightened, fearful’
Pn Tokelauan mataku ‘be afraid, frightened’
Pn Tahitian mataʔu ‘apprehension’ (s.t. bad might happen)

A number of NNG and PT languages have BPMs to express fear, but their components differ from one language to the next. For example:

NNG Mangap kuli- i-mozōro [skin- it-scatter] ‘really frightened’
NNG Mangap mata- koikoi [eye- evasive] ‘fearful’
NNG Takia ilo- i-rer [insides- it-tremble] ‘afraid, frightened, fearful’
PT Tawala nugo-helele [mind-fearful] ‘nervous, anxious, afraid, shaking with fear, surprised, have pounding heart’

4.2. Ashamed, embarrassed, shy⇫

The next term is remarkable among emotion terms in being reconstructable right back to PAn with very high consistency of meaning. The emotion, for which there is no single equivalent English term, is valued as an instrument of social control, most effective in small communities. As described by Charles Valentine with reference to Nakanai speakers,

The feeling is described as a kind of acute embarrassment which is occasioned by public exposure, violation of modesty, recognition of deception, social exclusion, and certain other forms of interaction in which the subject feels threatened by the inappropriateness of his relations with others. (Valentine 1963:445)

PAn *ma-Seyaq ‘shy, embarrassed; ashamed’ (PAn *Seyaq ‘shyness, embarrassment; shame’) (ACD)
PMP *ma-heyaq ‘shy, embarrassed; ashamed’
POc *maya(q) ‘shy, ashamed’
NNG Manam maia, maya, maya-maya ‘ashamed’
NNG Gedaged ma-mai ‘shame; embarrassment, confoundedness, abashment’
NNG Numbami me-meya ‘shy, ashamed’
NNG Yabem maya ‘shame, feeling of honour, self-esteem’
NNG Bukawa maya ‘shame, embarrassment’ (experienced by people who have been found out; Hogbin 1947, village of Busama)
NNG Kove ma-maia ‘ashamed’
PT Ubir ma-mai ‘shy, ashamed’
PT Dobu (o)maia-maia ‘shame, shyness, be ashamed, shy’
PT Molima (wo)maya-maya ‘shame’
MM Ramoaaina mai-mai ‘shame; ashamed’
MM Maringe ma-maja ‘ashamed’
SES Gela mā ‘ashamed; feel reverence’
SES Lau māsia ‘shame’
SES Sa’a masa, masa-masa ‘shy, ashamed, respectful’
SES Sa’a masa-ŋa ‘shame, confusion, shyness’
SES Arosi [ma]masa ‘ashamed’
NCal Iaai m̥e-m̥æ ‘ashamed’
Mic Kiribati mā-ma ‘shame, timidity, shyness, bashfulness’
Mic Kiribati ma-mā-ma ‘be ashamed, shy, confused’
Mic Woleaian ma ‘shame, embarrassment’
Mic Woleaian mā, ma ‘ashamed; disgraceful; feel shameful’
Fij Bauan mā(duā) ‘ashamed, bashful’
Pn Tongan mā [VI] ‘feel shame, be ashamed’
Pn Pukapukan (aka)mā ‘be ashamed, embarrassed, shy, timid’ (aka ‘cause, become’)
Pn Samoan mā ‘be ashamed, embarrassed’
Pn Tahitian (haʔa)mā ‘embarrassment or shame’ (opposite of mātau ‘comfortable with a situation’)
Pn Māori mā ‘shame, abasement; shy, ashamed’
cf. also:
NNG Takia miai ‘shame, ashamed’
PT Kalauna (veu)maiyiyi ‘a mixture of anger, shame, self-pity and resentment’ (exorcising one__s own shame by casting the shame back at the one who shamed by forcing him to accept a gift etc.; Michael Young, pers. comm.)

4.3. Love, be compassionate, be sorry for, have pity, sympathise⇫

The English term love is polysemous, with one meaning, ‘romantic love’, given an importance in Western societies that is not generally paralleled elsewhere. In Tahitian maʔa-maʔa is translated by Levy as

to be crazy, bizarre (incl. being romantically in love). This is considered somewhat bad and abnormal. (1973:305)

Across Oceanic languages, terms for ‘to be lovers’5 are distinct from terms that denote caring about someone, and terms used to refer to the latter include an emotion akin to compassion. This semantic frame is labelled SORRY here, in recognition of the fact that the word sore encodes this frame in both Papua New Guinea Tok Pisin and Vanuatu Bislama. Motu hebogahisi ‘pity, compassion’ is instructive, combining boga ‘belly, seat of desire and affection’ with hisi ‘pain’. Other glosses combining what in English are distinct emotions include Gedaged ilo- pani [inside- give] ‘sympathise with, love, pity, yearn for, feel for, commiserate with, mourn for, be homesick for s.o., s.t.’; Tolai māri ‘to love, pity, have compassion for’, Roviana tataru ‘to pity, love’, To’aba’ita tatakomia ‘have a feeling of deep affection for s.o., s.t., such as sorrow, pity, compassion, mercy, love or admiration’, Arosi tabai ‘to love, pity’, Rotuman ruu ‘to love, value, care greatly for, feel solicitude’. English speakers, on the other hand, are more likely to include ‘love’ as an extension of ‘like’, ‘admire’ and a range of terms for ‘desire’.

As noted in §10.3, the SORRY frame is one of the meanings of widely distributed reflexes of POc (VI) *drodrom, (VT) *drom-i ‘think, worry; love, be sorry for, long for’. A dedicated SORRY verb, POc *qarop, *qarop-i- ‘feel pity, empathy, be sorry for’,6 was inherited from PMP but is reflected only in SES and Pn languages. The Arosi reflex and all Pn reflexes reflect an apparent PEOc *qarop-a. The suffix *-a probably reflects the POc nominaliser *an.

PMP *qarep ‘like, be fond of’ (Dempwolff 1938: *haḷəp)
POc *qarop, *qarop-i- ‘feel pity, empathy, be sorry for’
SES Bugotu (r)arov-i [VT] ‘to pity’
SES Gela arov-i [VT] ‘to pity’
SES Longgu arov-i- ‘feel sorry for and sad for s.o., how you feel for s.o. else who has some trouble’
SES Arosi ʔaroha ‘love, pity’
PPn *qarofa ‘love, pity, compassion’ (POLLEX)
Pn Tongan ʔofa ‘love, be kind to’
Pn Niuean ofa ‘to love (obsolete)’
Pn Rennellese ʔagoha ‘pity, feeling of love’
Pn Samoan alofa ‘love, affection, mercy, pity’ (stresses social bonding and obligation)
Pn Tokelauan alofa ‘love, affection, kindness’
Pn Tokelauan loto-alofa ‘kindhearted, friendly; kindness, friendliness, hospitality’
Pn Tikopia arofa ‘sympathy, affection, love’
Pn Tahitian arōfa ‘compassion, pity, empathy; feeling when separated from s.o. dear’
Pn Hawaiian aloha ‘love, affection, compassion, mercy, pity, kindness; greeting’
cf. also:
SES Gela aroha ‘sit sad, lonely, pitiable’ (-h- for †-v-)
Pn Pukapukan aloa ‘love, kindness, charity’

Two further cognate sets, each with few reflexes, permit the reconstruction of SORRY morphemes. The first, POc *dolom, is restricted to NWS and SES languages and may represent local innovations, but Nehan is the northernmost NWS language, so it is unlikely that the set is due to borrowing. It is likely that *dolom was a noun, as the Gela and Longgu transitives in -vi (for †dolom-i-) appear to reflect a PSES formation.

POc *dolom ‘love, pity, sorrow, compassion’
MM Nehan dolomo [N] ‘sorrow’
MM Nehan (uel)dolomo [V] ‘be sorry; show compassion’
SES Gela dolo [N] ‘pity’
SES Gela dolo-vi [VT] ‘love, pity’
SES Longgu dolo [VI] ‘love’
SES Longgu dolo-vi [VT] ‘love someone’

The set below is restricted to WOc. If the Iduna items reflect the same etymon, then its PWOc form was *(q)uduqu, but there is no three-syllable reflex ito confirm this.

PWOc *(q)udu, *(q)udu-an ‘be sorry for, pity, be merciful’
NNG Bariai udu-an ‘feel sorrow or pity for s.o. you care about; miss s.o.’
MM Bola du ‘care for’ (loss of initial u- unexpected)
MM Tinputz rūru-an ‘pity, have mercy’
MM Tinputz ur-uru-an ‘forgive, pity’
MM Teop uru [N] ‘pity’
MM Teop ur-uru [V] ‘have mercy, love’
cf. also:
PT Iduna duʔu [N] ‘love, affection, love-gift, share (of food, property)’
PT Iduna -duʔu [V] ‘feel affection; long for (person of opposite sex)’

A number of languages have BPMs for the SORRY meaning, but their components usually differ from language to language. Examples include:

Adm Nyindrou ade- hadru in ta- [liver- true in OBL-] ‘love, cherish, adore’
NNG Gedaged ilo- i-pani- [insides- it-give-] ‘sympathise with, love, pity, commiserate with, mourn for, long for’
NNG Takia bube- i-pani- [liver- it-give-] ‘love’
PT Bunama ʔate-muya-muya [liver-pain-pain] ‘pity, compassion’

In many of these BPMs, however, the modifying component has no meaning independent of the BPM in which it occurs.

4.4. Happy⇫

BPMs for ‘happy’, ‘cheerful’, ‘joyful’, ‘glad’, ‘carefree’ often have ‘good’ as their modifying component. This is sometimes a reflex of POc *puia ‘good’ or PEOc *leka ‘good, pleasant’ (§11.6.1).

NNG Takia ilo- uyan [insides- good] ‘happy, pleased, thanks, greeting’
NNG Yabem tɪtaʔ ŋayam [belly good] ‘contented, happy’
NNG Numbami tae-wia [guts-good] ‘happy’
NNG Mengen la-u-pe [insides-my-good] ‘I am happy’
NNG Mapos Buang aʁe- nivəca [insides- good] ‘happy’
PT Kilivila ibwaina lula [belly good] ‘he is happy, at peace, relaxed’
PT Dawawa nua-vere [insides-good] ‘happy’
PT Lala lalo nama [insides good] ‘happy’
PT Motu lalo namo [insides good] ‘happy’
SES Kwaio noni leʔa [body good] ‘grateful, happy, proud’
Pn Tokelauan loto-fiafia [inside-happy] ‘be humorous, happy’

While some Pn languages use a BPM with fiafia ‘happy’ as its modifying element, many of them use fiafia alone, as in the set below.

PPn *fia-fia ‘happy’ (POLLEX)
Pn Tongan fiefia ‘happy’
Pn Niuean fiafia ‘joy, delight, pleasure, be happy, joyful’
Pn Samoan fiafia [V] ‘enjoy’; [N] ‘gladness, enjoyment’; [ADJ] ‘happy’
Pn East Uvean fiafia ‘happy, joyful’
Pn Tuvalu fiafia ‘happy’
Pn Tikopia fiafia ‘glad’

It is just possible that POc had a single word, *puiawa-, for ‘happiness’ (or ‘happy’), apparently derived from *puia ‘good’ (§11.6.1). However, this derivation involves positing an otherwise unknown morpheme *-wa-, and possible reflexes are few.

POc *puia-wa ‘happiness’ (or ‘happy’?)
PT Gumawana uyawa- ‘happy, pleased’
PT Dobu uyawa- ‘joy, gladness; rejoice’
SES Owa piawa ‘happy; calm (of ocean)’

4.5. Sad⇫

No simple lexeme can be reconstructed for ‘sad’. Instead. many Oceanic languages use a BPM for ‘sad’, and related meanings like ‘depressed’, ‘miserable’ and ‘unhappy’, and here there are some consistent patterns. One pattern combines ‘insides’ or ‘mind’ with a term meaning ‘heavy’. The fact that no *qate- terms have been collected for ‘sad’-like emotions is possibly because these are seen as passive, non-violent. As Bugenhagen (2001:96) has argued for Mangap, *qate- terms occur most often with rash, impetuous emotions.

NNG Yabem ŋalɪlʊm wapaʔ [insides heavy] ‘his heart is heavy, full of sorrow, dispirited’
NNG Mangap lele- i-pata [insides- it-heavy] ‘worried, concerned, troubled, sad’
NNG Mapos Buang ayo maɣin [insides heavy] ‘sad, unhappy’
NNG Takia ilo-mulua-n [insides-heavy-3SG] ‘worried, feel badly, sad’
PT Motu lalo-metau [insides-heavy] ‘unwilling’
PT Dobu nua- i-mʷau [mind- it-heavy] ‘downhearted’
PT Kilivila mʷau nano [mind heavy] ‘sad’
PT Gumawana nuo- i-mou [mind- it-heavy] ‘sad’
PT Iduna -nua-vita [-mind-heavy] [VI] ‘heavy-hearted, sad’
SES To’aba’ita manata- e kuluʔa [mind- it heavy] ‘unhappy’
Fij Bauan loma-bībī [insides heavy, difficult, painful] ‘sad’

The Polynesian terms typically use a modifier reflecting POc *mapat ‘heavy’ (vol.2:213), without body part.

Pn Tongan mafas-i-a ‘be weighed down, burdened, literally or figuratively’
Pn Samoan mafat-i-a ‘be hurt, affected, physically and mentally tired’
Pn Tahitian fātaī ‘to be depressed, yield to discouragement’

Terms for ‘sad’ often overlap with those for ‘angry’ (§3.6). A second pattern uses ‘insides’ + ‘bad’ for ‘sad’ and a range of ‘feeling bad’ emotions that includes sadness and anger. In some cases the ‘bad’ word is a reflex of POc *saqat ‘bad’ (§11.6.2):

NNG Takia ilo-saian [insides bad] ‘sorrowful, angry, sad, feel badly’
NNG Mutu lolo i-saɣat [insides it-bad] ‘sad, upset’
SES Longgu taʔa kutu [bad belly] ‘be sad, anxious, worried, feel sorry’
SES ’Are’are rae- e taʔa [liver- it bad] ‘angry’

In other cases another term for ‘bad’ is used:

NNG Takia tiŋae- saian [guts- bad] ‘angry, furious, very annoyed’
NNG Manam ilo i-goala [insides it-bad] ‘sad’
NNG Mapos Buang aʁe nipaya [insides bad] ‘sad, unhappy, irritated, angry’
PT Dawawa nua-gewa [mind bad] ‘extremely sad’
PT Misima nua-nak [mind-bad] ‘sad’
MM Nakanai ilo-ruru [insides-wrong] ‘mournful, sad, disturbed, upset’
MM Nehan bala uasa [stomach bad] ‘upset, sad, incorrect’
MM Maringe diʔa nañafa [bad heart] ‘sad, regretful, feel bad, sorry’
NCV Lewo sine- vioa [guts- bad] ‘sad, unhappy, disappointed, sorry, upset’
PT Iduna nua- gi-koyo [mind- it-bad] ‘upset, angry, annoyed’
NCV Paamese ti- tīsa [guts- bad] ‘angry’

A less frequent but widely distributed BPM for ‘sad’ or ‘angry’ is ‘insides’ + ‘sick/painful’:

NNG Takia ilo- madai [insides- painful] ‘angry, bitter’
NNG Lukep lo- matamata [insides- sick] ‘despondent, depressed’
PT Tawala nugo-totogo [mind- sick] ‘sad’
PT Misima ati-lomʷan [liver-painful] ‘be sad; feel sorry for’
MM Patpatar bala ŋuŋut [stomach painful] ‘angry, sore at s.o., disgruntled’
NCV Lonwolwol lo- makenken [insides- painful] ‘sad’
NCV Lonwolwol lɔ- merā [insides- sore] ‘angry’

4.6. Angry⇫

No reconstructions are proposed. Languages typically have a number of terms for various kinds of anger varying with the intensity of emotion and the construal of the triggering event. The following BPMs are from Yabem (NNG):

NNG Yabem tɪtaʔ gɪôʔ auʔ [belly.his grown.over PERF] ‘he is full of rage, cannot think clearly because of rage’
NNG Yabem tɪtaʔ kɪmʷatiŋ tau [belly.his knot itself] ‘he is burning with rage; is angry, irritated’
NNG Yabem tɪtaʔ kɪpʷa [belly.his explode] ‘his blood is up, swells with rage’
NNG Yabem tɪtaʔ kɪbuli auʔ [belly.his twisted PERF] ‘’his heart is enraged, irritated, takes offence at s.t., feels scandalised by s.t.’
NNG Yabem tɪtaʔ ŋamakiʔ [belly.his bitter] ‘he is angry, bitter, irritated’
NNG Yabem tɪtaʔ ŋandaŋ [belly.his hot] ‘he is furious’
NNG Yabem tɪtaʔ seʔ [belly.his bad] ‘he is discontented, displeased, angry, dismal, sad’

Anger often overlaps with sadness insofar as BPMs of the pattern ‘insides’ + ‘bad’ and ‘insides’ + ‘painful’ mean either ‘angry’ or ‘sad’ or both. Examples are given in §11.4.5.

The examples below, although ranging in meaning from ‘cross’ to ‘indignant’ to ‘furious’, all contain metaphors that relate to heat or fire or its consequences.

Adm Nyindrou drine- i buku jih [stomach- it burn fire] ‘get hot with anger’
NNG Takia bube- yai inani [liver- fire cook] ‘very angry’
NNG Takia ilo- wananan [insides- hot] ‘indignant, cross, angry’
NNG Bukawa ataʔ ŋade [liver -his hot] ‘angry’
PT Motu lalo-siahu [insides-hot] ‘angry’
MM Nakanai la hate-la mamasi [the liver-his salty] ‘he is angry’
MM Patpatar bala mamahien [stomach hot] ‘very angry’
SES Lau lio e sasu [voice it smoke] ‘angry’
SES ’Are’are rae- e kora [liver- it embers] ‘angry’
NCV Araki lolo koru [insides burnt] ‘angry’
NCV Lonwolwol lɔ- mafrī [insides- flaming] ‘angry’
NCV Lonwolwol ləl-faŋfaŋ [insides-on.fire] ‘angry’

4.7. Confused⇫

Terms from three languages support a PEOc reconstruction:

PEOc *lole ‘be confused’
SES ’Are’are rore ‘be confused, talk confusedly’
SES Sa’a lole ‘be confused, dazed’
Pn Māori rore ‘intoxicated; entangle’

Some languages, like Maori above, express mental confusion by describing the mind as tangled (as of vegetation), while two SES languages below describe the mind as closed or blocked:

NNG Takia ilo- i-balkaluk [insides- it-tangled] ‘confused’
PT Minaveha nua- vi-tupatupa [mind- it-dense] ‘confused’
MM Tolai puruai ‘be tangled, confused, puzzled’
SES Longgu bono-bou [head-blocked (uncleared of bush)] ‘confused’
SES To’aba’ita qasifono [VI] ‘be very confused’ (qasia ‘particle intensifier’, fono ‘be closed’)
SES Kwaio filu ‘tangled, confused, perplexed’

4.8. Surprised⇫

Not unexpectedly a number of terms for ‘surprised’ are perceived as associated with fear and used also for ‘alarmed’ or ‘shocked’. In both the Pn and Mic cognate sets given below there is also an association with being woken suddenly.

A recurrent metaphor incorporates words for jumping or flying using reflexes of POc

FIXME: what to do with next line, protoform without protolang *Ropok ‘to fly’ (§6.3.2.1. Micronesian and Polynesian terms occur without body part.) NNG: Lukep kate rō [liver flew] ‘excited to the point of forgetting what one was doing’ PT: Kiriwina i-yowa lopo-la [it-flew belly-his] ‘he leapt in surprise’ PT: Kukuya viau novo ‘frighten, ambush, surprise s.o.’ (viau ?)

PPn *ofo ‘wake up, be startled’ (POLLEX)
Pn Tongan ofo [VI] ‘to be surprised, wake up’
Pn Niuean ofo ‘to surprise, be surprised’
Pn East Futunan ofo ‘wake up’
Pn Samoan ofo ‘startled, surprised’
Pn Tokelauan ofo ‘amazement, surprise’
Pn Māori oho ‘start from fear, surprise; wake up’
Pn Hawaiian oho ‘leap up, as startled birds’

Nakanai uses the same metaphor with a non-cognate term for the verb:

MM Nakanai la-hate-la raga [liver leaps] ‘he is startled’
POc *(lalo-) -rutu ‘surprised’
NNG Takia ilo i-rut ‘surprised, fearful, trembling inside’
PMic *rut(i,u) ‘become aware, wake up, be surprised’ (Bender et al. 2003)
Mic Kiribati uti ‘to arise, awake’
Mic Marshallese ruc ‘wake up, arouse’
Mic Kosraean lut ‘be surprised, startled, amazed’
Mic Puluwatese rɨ ‘to be startled, surprised, alarmed’
Mic Carolinian rɨ [VI] ‘to be surprised, shocked, startled’
Mic Satawalese rrɨ ‘surprised’
Mic Woleaian rʉsʉ ‘be frightened, scared’

5. Desiring and wanting⇫

We have included desire and wanting in this chapter because in some contexts (being envious, homesick) it has a strong emotional basis.7 In others, of course—lacking food (§§4.3.3.1–2) or sleep (§4.6.2), sexual desire (§4.2.2.2)—it denotes a physical rather than emotional need.

The most striking result of our searches for ways in which POc speakers expressed ‘want’ and ‘desire’ is the absence of any consistency of expression in modern languages outside the Central Pacific (Fij + Pn) group. A major reason for this is that, as a result of the ubiquity and frequency of ‘want’ in the world’s languages, ‘want’ words tend strongly to undergo grammaticisation and to end up as particles in the slots otherwise reserved for tense, aspect and especially mood markers. The endpoint of this tendency is that the ‘want’ morpheme undergoes extension of function and becomes a future or irrealis morpheme, accompanied by the innovation of new ways of expressing ‘want’. Thus in Takia (NNG) the ‘want’ morpheme is the enclitic *=[w]o, which occupies the first of a series of postverbal enclitic slots (Ross 2008) that are otherwise occupied by aspect or mood morphemes:

NNG Takia ŋ-le=o [I-see=want] ‘I want to see’
NNG Takia ŋ-le=da [I-see=imperfect] ‘I am seeing’
NNG Takia ŋ-le=ya [I-see=realis] ‘I saw’
NNG Takia ŋ-le=wa [I-see=irrealis] ‘I shall see’

In Longgu (SES) the ‘want’ morpheme is preverbal tali, in the same structural position as certain aspectual morphemes and the negator (Hill 1992):

SES Longgu tali inu [want drink] ‘(I) want to drink’
SES Longgu tazani tate [just appear] ‘(I) have just appeared’
SES Longgu vusi aŋi [almost cry] ‘(I) am almost crying’
SES Longgu se lae [not go] ‘(I) am not going’

A number of languages of the Southeast Solomons, Fiji and Polynesia are like Longgu: they have a pre-verbal particle or prefix meaning ‘want’, but the SES and Wayan Fijian forms show no relation to each other, nor to PCP *via below.

SES ’Are’are siri ‘hanker after, long for, desire’ (siri hana ‘very hungry’, siri koʔu ‘thirsty’)
SES Arosi gasi- ‘to desire, desiderative prefix to any verb’ (gasi-gono ‘thirsty’, gasi-maura ‘sleepy’, gasi-ŋau ‘hungry’)
SES Kwaio māli- ‘prefix’ (māli-faŋa ‘hungry’ and māli-goʔu ‘thirsty’)
Fij Wayan mata ‘preverbal particle, want, desire, feel need to do V’ (mata kani ‘hungry’, mata som ‘thirsty’, mata moðe ‘sleepy’)

Data supporting the reconstruction of PCP *via ‘want to’ are given below.

PMP *pian ‘want, desire, wish or long for’ (ACD)
POc *pia(n) ‘want to’
PCP *via ‘desiderative particle or prefix’
Fij Bauan via ‘auxiliary verb expressing desire’
Fij Wayan via ‘preverbal particle: marks an act as done for fun, pleasure rather than for serious purpose; want to do’
Pn Tongan fie ‘preposed verb; want, desire, wish, be willing’
Pn Niuean fia ‘desire, want’
Pn Samoan fia ‘pre-verbal particle: wish, like, aspire to’
Pn East Futunan fia- ‘verbal prefix indicating wish, desire’
Pn Pukapukan wia ‘want’
Pn Pileni fie ‘preverbal adverb indicating a wish or need’
Pn Tokelauan fia- ‘prefix indicating a wish, a liking’
Pn Tikopia fia, fifia ‘want, desire, wish (normally followed by common verbs or nouns, giving unitary concepts)’
Pn Tahitian hia-ai ‘desire food, drink’
Pn Māori hia ‘desire, want’ (prefix on small group of words such as eat, drink etc.)
Pn Hawaiian hia ‘desire, want, delight in’
Pn Marquesan hia moe ‘sleepy’
cf. also:
SES To’aba’ita fiia [VT] ‘expect, anticipate s.t.; have a feeling that s.t. will happen; expect s.o. to do s.t.’
NCV Lewo ve ‘want’

As noted in §§4.3.3.1–2 and §4.6.2.1 Central Pacific languages express the concepts of being hungry, thirsty and sleepy as sequences of ‘want to’ + verb:

  • PCP *via kani ‘be hungry’ (lit. ‘want eat’)
  • PCP *via inu ‘be thirsty’ (lit. ‘want drink’)
  • PCP *via moze ‘be sleepy’ (lit. ‘want sleep’)

Since PCP *via apparently reflects PMP *pian, the reconstruction of POc *pia(n) can be inferred. However, it seems to have been displaced in non-Central Pacific Oceanic languages by a variety of lexical strategies.

A range of languages use reflexes of POc *mate ‘to die’ (§4.2.1.2) to express an intense need, particularly for such things as food, water, or betelnut, paralleling the English expressions ‘dying for a smoke’ etc.

NNG Takia you=o -mat [water=for -die] ‘thirsty’
NNG Gedaged -mat ‘long, yearn, crave, desire, lust after’
NNG Mengen mate-ka- [die eat] ‘want food, be hungry’
NNG Kakuna mate-kana [die eat] ‘hungry’
NNG Uvol mete-ana [die eat] ‘hungry’
SES Lau mae-li gwou [die-TR water] ‘long for a drink, be thirsty’
SES Kwaio mā-li faŋa [die-TR food] ‘long for food, be hungry’

In a number of languages, desire is strongly identified with the reflex of POc *lalo-, *lalom ‘inside; seat of thoughts and emotions’ or whatever has replaced it as the term for ‘mind’ (§9.4). The following example from Bugenhagen’s Mangap-Mbula grammar (1995:223) illustrates how this works (or in some languages, once worked):8

    • Mangap (NNG)
      ‘I wanted to go at night.’
      Nio lele-ŋ be aŋ-la pa ᵐbeŋ
      I insides-my NF I-go at night

A more literal translation is ‘My inside/thought/desire (was) that I would go at night.’ This Kalokalo (PT) sentence has a similar structure (Guderian & Guderian 2002).

    • Kalokalo (PT)
      ‘I wanted to sell it.’
      nuanua-gu ya-na-egimʷaneye-ya
      want-my I-will-sell-it

In some languages the ‘mind’ noun has been (half-)transformed into a verb, as in Lewo (NCV), where the transitive verbal suffix -ni is attached to the ‘mind’ noun sine- ‘guts’ and its possessor suffix, in this instance -la ‘their’ (Early 1994a).

    • Lewo (NCV)
      ‘They want Palua to go out to the ship.’
      sine-la-ni ∅-sape Palua ∅-va e wa
      guts-their-TR it-say Palua he-iRREALIS.go to ship

Ivens (1937) shows that the Gela ‘mind’ term lio- is similarly used. It takes a possessor suffix like any inalienably possessed noun, but is accompanied by the verbal morphemes that one would expect with a verb like ‘want’.

Finally, another strategy for expressing ‘want’ is to use the verb ‘say’, a natural extension of internal speech and thought. In Bariai (NNG) keo serves as both ‘say’ and ‘want’, but its sense is disambiguated by the construction that follows it (Gallagher & Baehr 2005).

    • Bariai (NNG)
      ‘They tell the women to go to the garden.’
      Ti-keo pa=gid taine ngan ti-la dadanga-i.
      they-say to=them female to they-go garden-at
    • Bariai (NNG)
      ‘I want you to come tomorrow morning.’
      Na-keo ga sabale gaisala eao Ø-nam.
      I-say that tomorrow morning thou thou-come

Bowern (2011:151) notes a similar development in Titan (Adm).

6. Evaluation: good vs bad⇫

Because what is experienced may be animate, inanimate or abstract and because evaluation is in the mind of the experiencer, evaluative terms, particularly those for ‘good’ and ‘bad’, may be applied to both animates and inanimates. As value terms they stand alone, but they are also a component of BPMs (§9.5) or they follow terms used specifically to mark a quality as customary or habitual (§11.3).

6.1. Good⇫

Terms for ‘good’ have been difficult to reconstruct. Two reconstructions are proposed: POc *puia and PEOc *leka.

With regard to *puia, originally an alternant *uia was reconstructed. The reflexes that require this are those from Takia and its neighbours and Hote, shown under ‘cf. also’. These appear to be instances of an idiosyncratic sound change in a frequently used item. However, the Loniu, Titan and Sio reflexes are those that would have occurred if *p were between two vowels. and it is reasonable to infer that in these languages, at least, the reflex of *puia once behaved as a stative verb and took subject prefixes (e.g. i- 3SG). The Gitua and Labu forms and the second Nehan form reflect *puaia, and this was perhaps a POc alternant.

The form *puia is unusual because it contains a sequence of three vowels, which is very unusual in POc (otherwise occurring, as far as is known, only in *kaiu ‘tree’). Indeed, it is tempting to reconstruct either †*pʷia or †*puya in order to adhere to a POc canonic shape, but †*pʷia is eliminated by Loniu, Kaiep, Manam and Nehan reflexes, since *-u- is retained and *puya is hard to justify in the light of so many reflexes of *-i- rather than *-y-.

The presence of *-u- in *puia is also unexpected, as non-Oceanic cognates reflect PMP *ma-pia, i.e. the root is *pia.

PMP *ma-pia ‘good’
POc *puia ‘good’
Adm Loniu huya-n ‘good’ (medial reflex of *p-)
Adm Titan wia-n, uya-n ‘good’ (medial reflex of *p-)
Adm Lou pia-n ‘good’
Adm Baluan pia-n ‘good, well, all right’
NNG Ulau-Suain ya-ñ ‘good’
NNG Kaiep uya-n ‘good’
NNG Manam (ia)uia ‘good’
NNG Dami bia ‘good, right, correct, righthand side’ (b- for †p-)
NNG Mutu poia ‘good’
NNG Gitua pʷaya ‘good’ (for †pʷia)
NNG Lusi poea ‘good’
NNG Mengen pe ‘good; right hand’
NNG Kilenge pa-pue ‘good’
NNG Mangap pe ‘good, well’
NNG Sio wia ‘right hand’ (medial reflex of *p-)
NNG Kaiwa vie ‘good’
NNG Numbami wia ‘good’
NNG Labu haya ‘good’ (for †hia)
SJ Sobei fia ‘good’
PT Gumawana uya(wana) ‘happy, pleased’
MM Nehan uia ‘good’
MM Nehan uaia ‘correct’
MM Tinputz vi(h) ‘good’
PNCV *vuia ‘good’ (Clark 2009: *wia)
NCV Mota wia ‘good, of the right sort, without anything unusual’
NCV South Gaua we ‘good’
NCV Mwotlap wɪ ‘good’
NCV Tolomako wia ‘good’
NCV Lonwolwol wu ‘good’ (realis: bu)
NCV Port Sandwich voi ‘good, well, pleasant’
NCV Nakanamanga pʷia ‘good’ (realis form?)
NCV Nguna wia ‘good’
NCV Lelepa wia ‘good’
NCV South Efate wi ‘good’
cf. also:
NNG Takia uya-n ‘good’
NNG Bilibil uya-n ‘good’
NNG Matukar uya-n ‘good’
NNG Mindiri uya-n ‘good’
NNG Misim (ma)ui ‘good’

Reflexes of PEOc *leka ‘good, pleasant’ may also refer to temperaments, as in Pukapukan (yau)leka [temperament good] ‘calm, gentle, mild, quiet’.

PEOc *leka ‘good’
SES Lau lea ‘good’
SES Kwaio leʔa ‘good, well’
SES Dori’o leʔa ‘good’
SES Kwara’ae leaʔ ‘good’
PPn *leka ‘pleasant’ (POLLEX)
Pn Pukapukan leka ‘pleasant, sweet, good, delicious’
Pn Tikopia (tau)reka-reka ‘fine, splendid, handsome, beautiful’
Pn Rarotongan reka ‘pleasant’
Pn Māori reka ‘pleasant, sweet’
Pn Hawaiian leʔa ‘pleasant’

6.2. Bad⇫

The POc term for a negative evaluation of various kinds was *saqat ‘bad’.

PMP *zaqat ‘bad’ (ACD)
POc *saqat ‘bad’
NNG Takia saia-n ‘bad’
NNG Yabem seʔ ‘bad, evil’
NNG Tami sakat ‘bad, spoilt’
MM Bali zaɣata ‘bad’
MM East Kara (mo)sat ‘bad’
MM Notsi caka ‘bad’
MM Tabar caka ‘bad’
MM Label saka ‘bad’
MM Patpatar sakana ‘bad; evil; ruined; worthless’
MM Minigir saka(i) ‘bad’
MM Tolai ka(i) ‘bad’
MM Ramoaaina akə ‘badly’
MM Teop hata ‘bad’
MM Torau saka(ala) ‘bad’
MM Vaghua sata ‘bad’
MM Varisi sakata ‘bad’
SES Lengo ðaɣata ‘bad’
SES Longgu taʔa ‘bad’
SES To’aba’ita taʔa [VI] ‘be bad, no good; feel bad, physically, mentally, emotionally’
SES Lau tā ‘bad, evil’
SES ’Are’are taʔa ‘wrong, bad, evil; be dying, be in a bad condition’
SES Arosi taʔa ‘bad, poor, of poor quality’
NCV Hiw sa ‘bad’
NCV Nese sat ‘bad’
NCV Nakanamanga sa ‘bad’
NCV Namakir (a)haʔ ‘bad’
NCV Nguna sā ‘bad’
SV Sye sat ‘badly; problem, trouble’
NCal Xârâcùù xyā ‘bad’
Fij Bauan ðā ‘bad, evil’
Pn Samoan sā ‘forbidden, sacred’
Pn West Futunan sa ‘bad’

A number of reflexes point to a final *-i. Whilst the Arosi and Bauan reflexes under ‘cf. also’ self-evidently reflect *saqat plus the transitive suffix *-i, the gloss ‘bad’ indicates that this is not the source of *-i in the items listed below and that they perhaps reflect an alternant *saqati.9

POc *saqati ‘bad’
NNG Malalamai sati ‘bad’
NNG Mutu saɣati ‘bad’
NNG Gitua saɣati ‘bad’
NNG Kove sasi ‘bad’
NNG Aria sasi ‘bad’
NNG Atui ses ‘bad’
NNG Avau ses ‘bad’
PT Sudest ðari ‘bad’
MM Lihir caket ‘bad’
PNCV *saqati ‘bad’ (Clark 2009)
NCV Tamambo sati ‘bad; dead (euphemism)’
NCV Tangoa sati ‘bad’
NCV Nduindui hati ‘bad’
SV Anejom̃ has ‘bad’
cf. also:
SES Arosi taʔa-i [VT] ‘to spoil’
Fij Bauan ðāti- [VT] ‘to hate s.o.; deem s.o. bad’

POc *jika ‘be soiled, weakened’ appears to have been a stative verb used primarily of inaminates and meaning something like ‘be unfit for use’. But some languages extend their reflexes of *jika to describe negative emotions or behavioural qualities:

PT Motu kara dika [conduct bad] ‘sin’
PT Motu gaiho dika [character bad] ‘inhospitable, mean’
PT Motu lalo dika [insides bad] ‘miserable’
MM Maringe diʔa na̰ñafa [heart bad] ‘sad, sadness’
SES Gela lio dika [disposition bad] ‘sad, sorry; to hate’
SES Bugotu dika hehe [bad heart/mind/wish] ‘grief, to grieve, be sad; bear ill will’
POc *jika ‘be soiled, weakened’
NNG Lukep sia(na) ‘bad’
NNG Maleu sia(ŋe) ‘bad’
NNG Manam ziʔa-ziʔa ‘dirty, soiled’
NNG Bam jik-jik ‘dirty’
NNG Wogeo -jika ‘(wood) rotten’
NNG Kairiru -jieq ‘(wood) rotten’
PT Motu dika ‘bad, badness; calamity; guilt’
MM Marovo cie-na ‘bad’
MM Vangunu sie-na ‘bad’
MM Kokota dia ‘bad’
MM Maringe diʔa ‘bad’ (borrowed from Bugotu)
SES Bugotu dika ‘be bad, evil, wrong’
SES Gela dika ‘bad, inferior’
Fij Bauan ðika(i) ‘be destroyed, be weakened’
Fij Bauan ðika(a), ðika(va) ‘destroy s.t.’

Notes⇫