Chapter 2.7 Properties of inanimate objects

Malcolm Ross

1. Introduction⇫

The terms reconstructed in this chapter denoted properties of inanimate objects in POc. It is impossible to draw a clear line between the properties of inanimate objects and the properties of living beings as there are some properties, for example, ‘big’ and ‘small’, which were almost certainly used of both inanimate objects and animate beings. However, there are also many property expressions which were evidently used only of animate beings, and these are not considered here.1

Oceanic languages make some distinctions between properties of inanimates and properties of animates that are not made in European languages, and vice versa. In most Oceanic languages there are distinct words for ‘old’ as applied to inanimate objects and ‘old’ as applied to human beings, and different temperature terms for the physical environment and for the human body. This appears to have been true in POc as well, where *[ma]tuqa ‘ripe, mature, adult, old’ was used of animates and POc *tuqaRi ‘long ago, old’ and *rapu-ka ‘old’ of inanimates.

Property words in European languages are typically adjectives. It is fairly certain, however, that POc did not have a separate adjective word class. Instead, it had a small subclass of nouns and a large subclass of verbs that were used to express properties (see vol.1,34–35). For convenience, I have named these adjectival nouns and adjectival verbs. The test of whether a noun or verb is adjectival is that it can occur without any additional morphology as the modifier of a noun. However, these subclasses have undergone various redistributions in different Oceanic languages, and this can sometimes make it difficult to determine whether a given reconstruction was a noun or a verb. Ross (1998a) gives a detailed study of the syntax of POc adjectival categories and of subsequent developments, and a second study (Ross 1998b) focuses on the fate of adjectival verbs and nouns in certain Western Oceanic languages.

Languages in which there is no adjective class or in which there is a small class of adjectives or adjective-like words are fairly common among the world’s languages, as Dixon (1977, 1982) has shown, and, if we count the small class of adjectival nouns as more adjective-like than adjectival verbs, then Dixon’s generalisation extends to POc. Dixon divides properties into seven semantic categories: dimension, age, value, colour, physical property, human/animal propensity, and speed. In Oceanic languages, speed belongs with strength and toughness, a subcategory of physical property, and so I treat it thus (§5.3). Of Dixon’s categories, I will here not discuss value (‘good’, ‘bad’), human/ animal propensity (e.g. ‘kind’, ‘clever’, ‘happy’, ‘jealous’, ‘tame’) or speed (‘quick’, ‘slow’), as these are applied either entirely or generally to animate rather than to inanimate entities. The category of physical properties is a large one, and some of its subcategories will also be ignored here, for similar reasons.2 This leaves the following semantic categories which include properties of inanimate objects:

  1. dimension and distance: e.g. ‘big’, ‘small’, ‘long’, ‘short’, ‘wide’, ‘narrow’, ‘near’, ‘far’
  2. age: e.g. ‘new’, ‘old’
  3. colour: e.g. ‘red’, ‘black’, ‘white’, ‘yellow’
  4. physical property:
    1. form: e.g. ‘straight’, ‘flat’, ‘rough’, ‘smooth’
    2. weight: ‘heavy’, ‘light’
    3. strength, toughness and speed: ‘strong’, ‘weak’, ‘hard’, ‘soft’
    4. content: ‘full’, ‘empty’
    5. temperature: e.g. ‘hot’, ‘cold’
    6. wetness and dryness: e.g. ‘wet’, ‘dry’

This categorisation is somewhat ad hoc, but, other than colours, its terms situate the object they describe relative to ‘a contextually determined standard of evaluation’ (Croft 1990:260). These standards of evaluation are the basic human standards of dimension, age and so on. I add distance to Dixon’s dimension category, as terms for ‘near’ and ‘far’ overlap with dimension terms in Oceanic languages.

Dixon assigns languages to one of three broad types with regard to the grammatical behaviour of their property terms. There are:

  1. languages like English, where there is a large open class of adjectives;
  2. languages like Samoan, where there is no distinct class of adjectives, but an open class of property terms which is a subclass of verbs;
  3. languages like Hausa, which have a closed, usually rather small, class of ‘adjectives’ and one or more open classes of property terms which are subclasses of nouns and/or verbs.

I have placed ‘adjectives’ in inverted commas in Type C because Dixon defines this class in terms of its meanings rather than in terms of its grammatical behaviour. In languages of Type A, there is an adjective class, i.e. a class of property terms whose grammatical behaviour is distinct from nouns or verbs. In languages of Type B, there is no such class. In languages of Type C, there is a closed class of property terms. Dixon does not discuss their grammatical behaviour in depth, and one can envisage several subtypes of Type C, depending on (i) whether the members of the closed class are adjectives (i.e. behave differently from nouns and verbs) or form a subclass of nouns or verbs, and (ii) whether the one or more open classes are subclasses of nouns and/or verbs. He indicates, however, that the closed class is more likely to grammatically resemble nouns than verbs (1982:56). As I indicated above, POc was evidently a Type C language where the closed class was indeed a subclass of noun, the open class a subclass of verb.

One of Dixon’s central findings is that in a Type C language, the members of the closed class usually belong to the semantic domains of dimension, age, colour and value. However, the converse is usually not true: not all property terms in these domains are adjectives. Instead, there are semantic oppositions where one pole is denoted by an adjective, the other by a verbal form. Often, the verbal form denotes the outcome of an event (e.g. cooked) whereas the adjective denotes the state prior to such an event (e.g. raw).

Basically, POc property terms conformed to these generalisations (Ross 1998a). The members of the adjectival noun class did indeed belong to the semantic domains of dimension, age, colour and value. However, they offer a small variation on Dixon’s typology in that there were no underived adjectival nouns denoting colours. Instead, colour adjectival nouns were derived from other nouns (§4), a complication which apparently does not occur in any of the languages in Dixon’s sample.

I have found twenty Oceanic languages which have a small property-term class for which a probably exhaustive list of underived members is available. The meanings represented in these small classes are listed below, together with the number of languages in whose small class each meaning is represented:

dimension
‘big’ 17
‘small’ 16
‘long, tall’ 6
‘short’ 4
‘thin’ 1
‘far’ 1
age
‘new’ 9
‘old’ 6
‘ripe’ 1
value
‘good’ 5
‘bad’ 4
‘true, real’ 2
‘beautiful’ 1
strength/toughness
‘hard, strong’ 1
‘soft’ 1

Except for one language (Sye) in which terms denoting strength/toughness belong to the small class, these meanings all fall into the domains of dimension, age and value.

The small-class terms in the twenty languages for the three most frequent meanings, ‘big’, ‘small’ and ‘new’, are listed below:

‘big’ ‘small’ ‘new’
Maleu amviŋe kapori- —
Mangap-Mbula biibi musaana —
Gumawana — — vau
Tawala banei- habulu- wou-
Saliba (Suau) woiyawaudoi gagili —
Bali-Vitu kapou kakauku vahoru
Nakanai uru bisi halaba
Tigak lavu — —
Halia pani — —
Teop — rutaa —
Zabana leɣaha rekaha foforu
Longgu bʷeina, vae kiki —
Tamambo tawera vorivori —
Paamese haitamene havivii haiitee-haau
Lewo — — viu
Sye oroŋ, nmah viroɣ —
Tinrin ḍoṛo hɯwɯ[-ṇã] hãmã[-ṇã]
Xârâcùù mʷĩĩ — —
Mokilese soapoan, leklekin — —
Bauan levu lailai vou

Although the same meanings occur in the small class across a number of languages, only for one of these, ‘new’, reflecting POc *paqoRu (p.209), are the majority of the items cognate with each other. This means that the other meanings listed above, including ‘big’ and ‘small’, have remained in the small class in most of these languages, but that lexical replacement has occurred.

The practical consequence of these observations is that, among underived property terms, only POc *paqoRu ‘new’ can be assigned to the class of adjectival nouns on the basis of this list. However, there is morphological evidence, noted below, that POc *lapuat ‘big’ (p.197),_ *qitik_/*qitek ‘small’ and POc *riki(t,q)/*ri-riki(t,q) ‘small’ (p.200) were also adjectival nouns.

With other underived items, we encounter the problem noted in vol.1,35: it is often impossible to assign a POc reconstruction to the appropriate word class. But the situation is not all gloom in this regard. One indicator of the class of a property term is derivational morphology.

Two morphemes occurred with some frequency in the derivation of these words, and others more rarely. The suffix *-ka derived adjectival nouns, whilst the prefix *ma- occurred in adjectival verbs. There is an important difference in the statuses of these affixes in POc, however. POc *-ka was apparently a productive suffix (Ross 2000; see below, for example *[tubu]tubu[-ka] ‘thick’ (p.208); *rapu-ka ‘old’ (p.211); *keja-ka ‘green’ (p.217)). PMP *ma- was a prefix that derived stative verbs, often from abstract nouns, and occurred as a fossil in a number of POc adjectival verb forms (Evans & Ross 2001),3 for example, POc *mataq ‘raw’ (vol.1,155), *maosak ‘ready to be eaten’ (vol.1,157), *maqasin ‘be salty’ (vol.1,159, this volume Ch. 3, §7.8, and several below). In a good many cases, forms with and without *ma- are reconstructable in POc, with no obvious difference in meaning (e.g. *[ma]lago ‘long, tall’ (p.204); *[ma]lawa ‘long, tall, far away’ (p.204); *[ma]tuqa ‘ripe, mature, adult, old’ (p.211)).4

More rarely occurring derivational morphemes are POc *ka-, a fossilised alternant of *ma-,5 (Huang 2000, Zeitoun & Huang 2000); *pa- and *paka-, the productive POc causative prefixes (vol.1,26–27), which were also used to form adverbs; and POc *ta-, which was productive and derived agentless statives from dynamic transitive verbs.

The remainder of this chapter is concerned with reconstructed forms for POc property terms. In all domains except colour, property terms tend to fall into antonym pairs, and are presented here in these pairs wherever appropriate.

2. Dimension and distance⇫

7.2.1 ‘big’/‘small’

It was noted above that lexical replacement of terms for ‘big’ and ‘small’ is common, whilst ‘new’ has tended to remain constant since POc times. A moment’s reflection shows that this is also true in English, apparently because people tend to exaggerate size and to play word games with the terms for it. As well as big we find large, great, huge, gigantic, enormous, immense, colossal, mammoth, massive, prodigious and more recently ginormous and humungous. However, what seem to have been the basic POc terms are reconstructable. They are *lapuat ‘big, large, important’, *qitik, *qitek ‘small’ and *riki(t,q) ‘small’, and the circumstantial evidence presented above suggests that they were adjectival nouns. This inference is moderately supported in the case of *lapuat by the presence of two reflexes of the reduplicated intensified form *lap(u)-lapuat (Tigak lap-lavu, Marshallese lɯap-lɯap) and one of a reduplicated plural form *la-lapuat (Marshallese lᵚ-lᵚap). Both reduplication strategies characterised adjectival nouns in POc (Ross 1998a).

Elsewhere I have reconstructed the term for ‘big’ as *labʷat (Ross 1998a:109), as the medial consonant in many of the forms below seems to reflect either *b or *bʷ. The Loniu and SV forms offer apparent disambiguation in favour of *bʷ. Whilst *labʷat must have occurred in the history of many of the forms below, it is not reflected by the Roviana, Hoava, SES, Mota or Raga forms, where the medial consonant appears to reflect *p The form *lapuat accounts for apparent reflexes of both *-bʷ- and *-p-. The forms which appear to reflect *-p- do just that. Moreover, Tigak lavu, West Kara labu, Raga lavoa and Bauan levu directly reflect medial *-pu-.6 The forms which appear to reflect *-bʷ- also do just that, but this *-bʷ- reflects a later interstage: POc medial *-pua- became first *-pʷa-, then *-bʷa-.

The sound changes in the paragraph above remain tentative, as there are few cases to compare this cognate set with. However, the least obvious step proposed above is that *-bʷa- developed from *-pʷa-, and there is reasonably good evidence for the step from *pʷ to *bʷ (vol.1,16).

The Mapos Buang and Mumeng Patep forms may be non-cognate, as their final -k reflects POc *-R, *-k or *-q.

POc *lapuat ‘big, important’ (Lichtenberk 1986:350: *la(m)pat ‘(be) big, great’)
Adm Seimat la-lap ‘big, important’
Adm Loniu lapʷa(na-n) ‘big, important’
Adm Papitalai laba-n ‘chieftain’
Adm Mussau (kula)laba ‘big, important’
NNG Manam laba ‘big, wide’
NNG Manam labata- ‘width’
NNG Kaiep labi ‘big, important’
NNG Kairiru (wo)lab ‘big, important’
NNG Ulau-Suain laba ‘big, important’
MM Lavongai lava ‘big, important’
MM Tigak lavu ‘big, important’
MM Tigak lap-lavu ‘very big’
MM West Kara labu ‘big, important’
MM Nalik laba ‘big, important’
MM Roviana lavata ‘great’
MM Hoava lavati ‘be big’
SES Talise lava ‘big, important’
SES Lau (a)lafa ‘chieftain’
SES Arosi (a)laha ‘chieftain’
SES Sa’a raha ‘big, important’
NCV Mota lava ‘big, important’
NCV Raga lavoa ‘big, important’
NCV Lewo lapa ‘fat’
NCV Nguna lapa ‘big, important’
SV Lenakel ipʷər ‘big, important’7
SV North Tanna empʷət ‘big, important’
SV Whitesands epʷət ‘big, important’
SV Anejom̃ (a)lpʷas ‘big, important’
Mic Marshallese lᵚap ‘great, large’
Mic Marshallese lᵚ-lᵚap ‘great, large (PL)’
Mic Marshallese lᵚap-lᵚap ‘very great, very large’
Mic Woleaian rap ‘big, important’
Fij Bauan levu ‘big, important’
cf. also:
NNG Mapos Buang levk ‘big, important’
NNG Patep lɛvak ‘big, important’

Inherited POc terms for ‘small’ were *qitik, with a variant *qitek, and *riki(t,q)/*ri-riki(t,q). There is reasonable evidence in the cognate set below that POc *ri-riki(t,q) was a plural form. Since reduplication of the kind reflected in POc *ri-riki(t,q) was one of the ways in which POc plural adjectival nouns were marked (Ross 1998a),we can infer that POc *riki(t,q) was singular. In a number of languages which reflect *ri-riki(t,q), however, there is a suppletive singular form (another indicator that this was an adjectival noun, not an adjectival verb; Ross 1998a).

In Proto Polynesian, *riki (reflecting POc *riki(t,q)) had become plural, contrasting with PPn *qiti ‘small (SG)’ (from POc *qitik), but there is no evidence that this had occurred at an earlier interstage. This contrast is reflected in the following compounds, which reflect PPn *tama ‘child’ (from POc *tama- ‘father’):

PPn *tama-qiti ‘child’ *tama-riki ‘children’
Tongan (tama-siʔi)8 tama-iki
E Uvean (tama-siʔi) tama-liki
Rennellese tama-ʔiti-ʔiti tama-giki
Hawaiian kama-iki (rare) kama-liʔi
Tahitian tama-iti tama-riʔi
Rarorongan tama-iti tama-riki
Maori tama-iti tama-riki

The reconstruction of PPn *riki is complicated by the fact that Tongan has two forms: iki, reflecting *riki, and liki, which occurs only in compounds. The latter may be a borrowing. On the other hand, it may reflect the separately reconstructable form POc *liki (see below). If it does, then we are left with the possibility that some of the Polynesian forms here attributed to POc *riki(t,q) instead reflect POc *liki, as POc *r and *l have merged in all Polynesian languages other than Tongan and Niuean.

Also apparently reconstructable are *drik(i), *liki, *siki and *kiki. Despite their similarity, there is no point in trying to derive these from each other. Rather, the human affection for small creatures, and prototypically for babies, has resulted in the same kind of word play among Oceanic speakers as we hear in English tiny, teeny, teeny-weeny and wee. If we ignore the criteria for reconstructing POc items and look for further candidates for word-play, we find for example siʔi ‘small, younger’ in Tongan, sisi in Futuna-Aniwa (Polynesian), and a long list in Puluwatese: kitikit, iyekkit, kikkit, lekit, rik, rirrik, mettik, rarikrik. It may well be, for example, that the items listed under *kiki are not due to shared inheritance but to independent parallel word play. It also seems, despite the doubts that have been expressed about this kind of sound symbolism (Hinton, Nichols & Ohala 1994:4), that Oceanic speakers have a preference for the high front vowel in terms for ‘little’, a phenomenon which is common in other areas of the world too (Ultan 1978).

PMP *qitik ‘small, little; few’ (Blust 1986; ACD)
POc *qitik, *qitek ‘small’
Yap Yapese ʔacīg ‘small’
NNG Gitua keteka ‘small’
NNG Gedaged kitik ‘small’
NNG Bukawa atiʔ ‘small’
NNG Zenag ktɔk ‘small’
MM Roviana ɣiteke ‘small’
MM Kia te ‘small’
SES Kwara’ae tiʔ-tiʔ ‘small’
Mic Carolinian xit ‘small’
Pn Rapanui ʔiti-ʔiti ‘small’
Pn Samoan iti-iti ‘small’
Pn Rennellese ʔiti-ʔiti ‘be small, not much, nor many’
Pn Hawaiian iki ‘small’
Pn Tahitian iti ‘small’
Pn Tuamotuan iti ‘small’
Pn Rarotongan iti ‘small’
Pn Māori iti ‘small’

PAn *diki[t,q] ‘little, few, small in amount’ (ACD)
POc *riki(t,q) ‘small’
POc *ri-riki(t,q) ‘small (PL)’
MM Bali (ma)ri-(ma)riki ‘small (PL)’ (cf. kakauku SG)
NCV Mota -rig ‘small’
NCV Tamambo (wa)ri-riɣi ‘small (PL)’ (cf. vorivori SG)
NCV Raga -rigi ‘small’
Fij Rotuman ri-riʔi ‘small, young (PL)’ (cf. meʔa-meʔa SG)
Pn Tongan iki ‘small’
Pn Tongan i-iki ‘small (non-singular)’
Pn Niuean iki-iki ‘small’
Pn Tokelauan liki ‘small-sized’
Pn Tuvalu liki ‘small (of person or chicken)’
Pn Rennellese giki ‘small’
Pn Tikopia riki ‘small’
Pn Sikaiana liki-liki ‘small’
Pn Sikaiana li-liki ‘small (PL)’
Pn Hawaiian liʔi ‘small’
Pn Tahitian riʔi ‘small (PL)’ (cf. iti SG)
Pn Rarotongan riki ‘small’
Pn Māori riki ‘small’
Pn Māori ri-riki ‘small (PL)’
Pn Tuamotuan riki ‘small’
Pn West Futunan rik-riki ‘small (PL)’ (cf. sisi SG)
POc *drik(i(t,q)) ‘small’
NNG Amara di-dik ‘small’
Mic Kosraean ṣɨk ‘small’
Mic Carolinian -ṣix ‘small, little, weak (in compounds only)’
Mic Marshallese ṛik ‘lowly, small’
Mic Marshallese ṛ-ṛik ‘lowly, small (PL)’
Mic Marshallese ṛik-ṛik ‘very lowly, very small’
Mic Puluwatese ṛik ‘be small (usually as a qualifier)’
Mic Puluwatese ṛirrik ‘small’
POc *liki ‘small’ (perhaps only in compounds)
NNG Arove (tu)lik-lik ‘small’
MM Lavongai lik ‘small’
MM Tigak (lak)lik ‘small’
MM Lihir (ia)lik ‘small’
MM Madak (kaka)lik ‘small’
MM Tolai (iki)lik ‘small’
MM Minigir (siki)liki ‘small’
MM Label (si-sik)lik ‘small’
MM Label (kak)lik ‘boy’
Pn Tongan -liki ‘small (in compounds only)’
Pn Samoan liʔi ‘scattered in small fragments’
Pn Ifira-Mele -riki ‘small’
Pn Takuu -riki (diminutive)

POc *kiki ‘small’
MM Torau kiki-(na) ‘small’
SES Gela kiki ‘small’
SES Talise ki-kiki ‘small’
SES Longgu kiki ‘small’
NCV Axamb kiki ‘small’
NCV Port Sandwich kekei ‘small’
PWOc *siki ‘small’
NNG Adzera (i)siʔ ‘small’
NNG Manam siʔi-siʔi ‘small’
MM Minigir siki(liki) ‘small’
MM Label si-sik(lik) ‘small’
MM Babatana (va)siki ‘small’

There is good evidence that POc had at least two lexicalised possessee-like attribute constructions, whereby ‘mother of an X’ meant ‘big X’, and ‘child of an X’ meant ‘small X’. A number of Oceanic languages in all three primary subgroups use reflexes of ‘mother of’ and ‘child of’ as the usual adjectives meaning ‘big’ and ‘small’, or perhaps ‘biggest’ and ‘smallest’, respectively.

POc *tina-ña ‘her/his mother; big, biggest’
Adm Bipi tinan ‘big’
Adm Nyindrou tinan ‘large, big’
NNG Tami tina-tin ‘very big, monstrous’
NNG Malai tina ‘big’
NNG Takia tinan ‘huge’
MM Label tna ‘big’
NCV Kiai tina-na ‘mother, huge, large’
POc *natu-ña ‘her/his child; small, smallest’
Adm Drehet neči ‘child; small, little’
NNG Dami nālu ‘small, little’
MM Patpatar nat ‘small’
MM Tolai nat ‘small’
NCV Lewo nari- ‘child, smallest’

These attributes turn up in odd lexicalised expressions, for example, Motu (PT) sina-vai ‘river’ (literally ‘mother of waters’ (Ch. 3, §6.1)); Gedaged boi tinan ‘Morning Star’ (literally ‘mother of stars’ (Ch. 6, §5.2.1)).

The reconstructable POc possessive construction was probably as follows:9

    • POc
      ‘a/the big house’ (more literally: ‘a/the mother of house(s)’)
      *a tina-ña Rumaq
      ART mother-P:3S house

This seems to have remained a live metaphor for a long time (and is perhaps still alive in some Oceanic languages). Evidence for this is that where the reflex of *tina- or *natu- has been replaced in a language, this construction often shares in the lexical replacement. Thus in Lewo (Early 1994a), the term for ‘little’/‘child’ still reflects *natu-ña, but the term for ‘very big’/‘mother’ has undergone lexical replacement:

    1. Lewo (NCV)
      ‘a little kid’ (more literally ‘the offspring of children’)
      nari-n sisi
      offspring-n child
    2. Lewo (NCV)
      ‘an immensely powerful hurricane’ (more literally ‘the mother of winds’)
      ane-n laŋi
      mother-n wind

Similarly in Tinrin (New Caledonia) hɯwɯ[ṇã] is both ‘small’ and ‘child of, sprout of’.

Matisoff (1992) has examined ‘mother of’ and ‘child of’ constructions which serve as augmentatives and diminutives in a range of Asian languages. Interestingly, whilst he reports a number of cases where ‘mother of’ and ‘child of’ are lexicalised in collocations where they mean something like ‘the most important’ and ‘a component/member of’, in none of these cases do ‘mother of’ and ‘child of’ seem to have been lexicalised as independent lexemes meaning ‘large’ and ‘small’.

2.2. Other dimensions⇫

English (and other European languages) have several antonym pairs denoting dimensions. Tall refers to the longitudinal dimension of a vertically oriented object, long to the longitudinal dimension of a horizontally oriented object. Short is the antonym of both tall and long. Wide and narrow refer to the transverse dimension of a flat object, thick and thin to the transverse dimension of an object which is not flat. Far and near(by) refer to distances, not to objects.

POc evidently made no horizontal/vertical distinction, so that *(b,bʷ)arapu, *[ma]lago and *[ma]lawa were used for ‘tall’ and ‘long’, and the two latter items evidently also for ‘far’ (§2.2.1). There are fewer reflexes of *tuku and *botoŋ ‘short’, so it is harder to know just how they were used (§2.2.2).

On the surface there appear to have been no POc etyma with the basic meanings ‘wide’ and ‘narrow’. However, it is just possible that *[ma]lawa simply denoted a large dimension, regardless of whether it was longitudinal (‘long’) or transverse (‘wide’). The evidence for this is indirect. POc *[ma]lawa ‘long, tall’ continues PMP *lawa, glossed ‘wide’, but a number of non-Oceanic reflexes also mean long: Malagasy lava, Manggarai lewe, Ngadha leva, and Palue lawa all mean ‘long’. Fordata lawa is glossed ‘length’ (ACD). It therefore seems likely that PMP *lawa also meant ‘long’, and possible that POc *[ma]lawa meant both ‘wide’ and ‘long’.

In a number of daughter languages reflexes of POc *ta-pola(s) ‘spread out (as of a mat)’ (derivationally related to *polas-i- ‘spread (s.t.) out (VT)’; see p.208) are by extension used to mean ‘wide’ (§2.2.4). In some Western Oceanic languages a reflex of *baban ‘flat; board, plank, canoe strake; flat shelf of rock’ is used for ‘wide’, but this is by extension from ‘flat’. Fijian raba ‘wide, broad’ reflects POc *raba(r), the basic meaning of which was also ‘flat, level’. Terms for ‘flat’ are covered in §5.1. No POc term for ‘narrow’ is reconstructable. Most modern languages use the terms for ‘big’ and ‘small’ with reference to the width of a path or a beach, and I infer that the same was true of POc.

POc terms for ‘thick’ were POc *ma-tolu, *kuba and *[tubu-]tubu(-ka), for ‘thin’ *manipis and *ma-tipi(s) (§2.2.5).

7.2.2.1 ‘tall’, ‘long’

Of the three terms for ‘tall’ and ‘long’, *(b,bʷ)arapu is underived and its Tamambo, Cèmuhî, and Bauan reflexes belong to the small closed adjectival class in their respective languages, so it is possible that *(b,bʷ)arapu belonged to the small class of adjectival nouns.

The other two terms, *[ma]lago and *[ma]lawa, clearly are derived. The final *-a of *[ma]lawa is reconstructed on the basis of the non-Oceanic evidence. A number of Western Oceanic languages (Lou, Titan, Nyindrou, Bing, Takia, Kayupulau, Gumawana, Torau) appear to reflect a final *-e. We can posit two possible sources of this, although neither reflects a regular process. The first is that in many Western Oceanic languages, an adjective takes a reflex of the third person possessor suffix *-ña either by default or when it agrees with a singular head noun. The palatal nasal *-ñ- may have caused the *-a- of *[ma]lawa-ña to be raised to *-e- in *[ma]lawe-ña. This is a reasonable interpretation of the Lou, Titan, Takia, Gumawana and Torau reflexes. Alternatively, in many Western Oceanic languages of the NNG and PT linkages, there is a locative postposition -i or -ai (relecting the POc locative proform *iai), and forms like Sio malawa-e and Bing malwe-i suggest that some instances of -e may reflect final *-a-i resulting from its capture.

POc *(b,bʷ)arapu ‘long, tall’
PT Kilivila -vanau ‘long’
MM East Kara vaiaf ‘long’
MM Nalik baraf ‘long’
MM Siar ba-baraf ‘long’
MM Nehan barah ‘long’
MM Maringe brahu ‘long’
SES Bauro borahu ‘long’
NCV Ambae gʷaravu ‘long’
NCV Tamambo baravu ‘long’
SV Anejom̃ (o)pra ‘long’
NCal Cèmuhî pílɛh́ɛ̃́- ‘tall, big, enormous; size’
Fij Bauan balavu ‘long, tall’ (l for expected *r)

PMP *[ma]laŋkaw ‘high, tall’ (ACD: *laŋkaw)10
POc *[ma]lago ‘long, tall’
NNG Amara melak ‘far away’
NNG Arove malak ‘long, far away’
NNG Kaulong (no)malak ‘long’
MM Meramera lago ‘long’
PMP *lawa ‘wide’ (ACD)
POc *[ma]lawa ‘(?) long, tall, far away; wide’
Adm Lou ɛlɛwɛ-n ‘long, tall’
Adm Titan aláwe-n ‘long, tall’
Adm Nyindrou lawe ‘long, tall’
NNG Gitua malawa ‘long; far away’
NNG Malai malau ‘long; far away’
NNG Mangap molo ‘long, tall’
NNG Sio malawa ‘a long time’
NNG Sio malawa(e) ‘a long way’
NNG Bebeli lo-loi ‘long’
NNG Bing malwe(i) ‘long’
NNG Takia milae-n ‘long’
NNG Kairiru milawo-ŋ ‘long’
SJ Kayupulau marawe ‘long’
PT Gumawana manawe- ‘long’
PT Mekeo maeva ‘long’
MM Nakanai malau ‘long’
MM Nalik laua-lau ‘far away’
MM Tolai lo-lovi ‘long’
MM Petats ra-ro-n ‘long’
MM Torau marae-la ‘long’
SES Kwaio la-lau ‘far’
SV Ura lau(pe) ‘long, tall’
SV Anejom̃ lau, laulau ‘long (of time)’
Pn Niuean loa ‘long, tall’
Pn Samoan loa ‘be old, ancient; be a long time’
Pn Māori loa ‘long, tall’

7.2.2.2 ‘short’

Two terms for ‘short’ are reconstructed. All the supporting data for *tuku are from Western Oceanic languages except for Mussau tuku. In the unlikely event that the latter were a borrowing, *tuku would then be of Proto Western Oceanic, rather than of POc, vintage.

POc *tuku ‘short’
Adm Mussau tuku ‘short’
NNG Mutu tuku ‘short’
NNG Bilibil tu-tuk ‘short’
NNG Manam -tuku(ra) ‘short’
MM Label tuk ‘short’
MM Babatana tuko ‘short’
POc *botoŋ ‘short’
MM Bali botoŋo ‘short’
MM Meramera boto ‘short’
MM Tigak poto ‘short’
SES Arosi pʷa-pʷatu ‘short’
Fij Wayan boto [postposed particle] ‘restrictive, only, just’
Fij Rotuman pofo ‘tiny; lump, small projection’
Pn Ifira-Mele pō-poto ‘short’
Pn Rapanui poto-poto ‘short’
Pn Māori poto ‘short’

7.2.2.3 ‘far’/‘near’

There is a tendency to replace terms denoting ‘far’ and ‘near’ with something more specific, so that instead of generic ‘far’ we get ‘beyond the horizon’ or ‘a long path’. Indeed, from the vantage point of a smaller island, ‘far away’ inevitably entails ‘beyond the horizon’. The hypothesis that ‘far away’ was sometimes replaced by ‘a long path’ receives some support from the fact that reflexes of POc *[ma]lago ‘long, tall’ and POc *[ma]lawa ‘long, tall’ (p.204) are sometimes used in the sense of ‘far away’.

A POc verbal root *sauq (V) ‘be far away’ is reconstructable.

PMP *Zauq ‘far away’ (Dempwolff 1938)
POc *sauq [V] ‘be far away’
POc *sau-sauq [ADV] ‘far away’
PT Tawala dau [V] ‘be far’
PT Tawala dau-dau-na [ADJ] ‘far, long’
PT Motu dau-dau [ADV] ‘far away’
MM Bali zauku ‘far away’
MM Vitu ðau ‘far away’
MM Roviana seu ‘far’
MM Hoava seo ‘far’
SES Gela hau ‘far’
SES Bugotu hau ‘far’
SES Talise sau-na ‘far’
SES Birao sau ‘far’
SES Longgu tau [V] ‘be far’
SES Kwaio tau ‘far’
SES Sa’a tau ‘far off, distant’
NCV Raga hau(tu) [ADV] ‘far’
NCV Paamese sau(tin) [ADV] ‘far’
SV North Tanna (i)sou [ADV] ‘far’
Mic Kiribati rā-roa [ADV] ‘far’
Mic Ponapean tō [ADJ] ‘distant, far off’
Mic Mokilese tō ‘far’
Mic Chuukese tōw ‘far’
Mic Carolinian tāw ‘far’
Mic Woleaian ttāw [ADV] ‘far’
Fij Rotuman sou-sou [ADV] ‘far’

PMP *ma-Zauq ‘far away’ (Blust 1981b)
POc *ma-sauq [V] ‘be far away’
Adm Mussau masau ‘far away’
PWOc *ka-sauq [V] ‘be far away’
NNG Takia asau [ADV, ADJ] ‘far away’
NNG Manam kasau [ADJ] ‘far away’
NNG Manam kasau(ba) [ADV] ‘far away’
MM Babatana köu ‘far’
MM Sisiqa kəu ‘far’
MM Nduke (ɣa)sau ‘far’

In Ysabel (MM) languages, POc *sauq is reflected with the reciprocal prefix *paRi-, as in Kia (vari)hau ‘far’ and Laghu (vari)hau ‘far’. I take it that the sense was formerly ‘far from each other’. In Southeast Solomonic languages it occurs with reflexes of the POc causative *pa- or *paka-, also used to form adverbs, and I assume this is the function of the prefix here:

SES West Guadalcanal (va)sau ‘far’
SES Sa’a (haʔa)tau ‘far’
SES Arosi (haʔa)tau ‘far’
SES Bauro (haɣa)tau ‘far’

The POc antonym of *sauq ‘be far away’ was the root *raŋi ‘be near’. However, *raŋi is not reflected without verb-deriving prefixes and is thus not reconstructable alone in POc. Most commonly it is reflected with *ga-, a prefix that I do not recognise: it may be a variant of *ka-, which also occurs with *raŋi.

POc *raŋi appears to be descended from PMP *dani. The replacement of *-n- by *-ŋ- evidently occurred earlier than POc, as we find Buru (Central Malayo-Polynesian) b-raŋi-n (ADV) ‘near’.

PMP *dani, *Sa-dani, *ma-dani ‘be near’11
PCEMP *daŋi ‘be near’
POc *garaŋi ‘be near’
NNG Takia giriŋe-n ‘close, near by’
NNG Dami garan ‘to, near’
SES Lau garaŋi [ADV] ‘near’
SES Kwaio galani, galaŋi [ADV] ‘near’
SES Kwaio galani-a, galaŋi-a [V] ‘be near’
SES Arosi garaŋi ‘near’
SES Fagani karaŋi ‘near’
POc *karaŋi ‘be near’
Adm Mussau kala-kalangi-na [ADV] ‘near’
NNG Mangap kolouŋa-na [ADV] ‘near’
NNG Mengen ko-koroŋo [ADV] ‘near’
SES Gela ɣaraŋi ‘near’
SES Bugotu ɣarani ‘near’
SES Talise ɣaraŋi ‘near’
POc *pa-raŋi, *paka-raŋi ‘be near’
SES West Guadalcanal va-raŋi ‘near’
SES Bauro haɣa-raŋi ‘near’
SES Kahua haɣa-raŋi ‘near’

There was also a POc term *tata ‘near’, perhaps an adverb:

POc *tata [ADV] ‘near’
MM Lungga tata ‘near’
MM Nduke tata ‘near’
MM Roviana tata [ADV] ‘near’
MM Hoava tata ‘near’
Pn Tongan tata ‘be near’
Pn Tahitian fa-tata [ADV] ‘near’
Pn Māori tata ‘be near, close’

7.2.2.4 ‘wide, spread out’

PMP *belaj ‘spread out to dry’ (ACD)
POc *ta-pola(s) ‘spread out (as of a mat); wide’
NNG Mengen (sasa)pola ‘wide’
SES Bugotu tavoða ‘wide’
SES Lau afola ‘wide’
SES Arosi ahora ‘wide’
NCV Raga tavola ‘flat, wide, smooth’
Pn Tongan tafola [VI] ‘be spread out, scattered about’

This term is related derivationally to POc *polas, *polas-i- ‘spread (s.t.) out’, reflected in (NCV) Tamambo vuolasi ‘spread (mat)’, Paamese hoosi ‘lay out (mat)’ and in (Pn) Tongan and Samoan fola ‘spread’ and Tongarevan ho-hora ‘spread out; wide open’. It is probable that -pola in Poeng sasapola is derived independently from a reflex of POc *polas. If so, then *ta-pola(s) is reconstructable only in PEOc.

7.2.2.5 ‘thick’/‘thin’

Three forms can be reconstructed for ‘thick’. The third, *[tubu]tubu[-ka], is derived from *tubuq ‘grow’.

PCEMP *telu ‘thick’
POc *ma-tolu ‘thick’ (Clark 1996)
NNG Manam matoli ‘thick’
NNG Sio mata-tola ‘thick’
MM Nakanai bitolu ‘thick’
SES West Guadalcanal matolu ‘thick’
NCV Mota matol-tol ‘thick’
NCV Paamese mate-tel ‘thick’
NCV Nguna matolu ‘thick’
SV Anejom̃ (a)mesej ‘thick’
Mic Marshallese micel ‘thick’
Mic Ponapean mosul ‘thick’
Fij Rotuman mafolu ‘thick’
Pn Tongan matolu ‘thick’
PMP *[ma-]kumba ‘thick (in dimension)’12
POc *kuba ‘thick (in dimension)’
Fij Nadrogā kuba ‘thick (in dimension)’
SV Kwamera -kum-kum ‘thick (in dimension)’
POc *[tubu]tubu[-ka] ‘thick (in dimension)’
MM Tolai tubu ‘thick (in dimension)’
SES Lau ūbu-ūbu-a ‘thick (in dimension)’
SES Kwaio ubu-ubu ‘thick (in dimension)’
SES Arosi ub-ubu-ʔa ‘thick (in dimension)’

Two formally related terms are reconstructable for ‘thin’: *ma-tipi(s) and *manipis. Although at first sight they look like forms derived with PMP *ma- and *maN- respectively, *manipis has cognates in Taiwan, reflecting PAn *maLipis. The prefix *maN- in any case dates only from PMP, and so cannot be reflected in *manipis. Instead, the two forms evidently reflect the same PAn monosyllabic root *-pis ‘thin, tenuous, fine’ (Blust 1988; see vol.1,27–28) and presumably differed in meaning by some subtlety which is not clear from their reflexes.

PMP *tipis ‘thin’13
POc *ma-tipi(s) ‘thin’
SES Talise matipi ‘thin’
SES Birao matipi ‘thin’
PAn *[ma]Lipis ‘thin’14
POc *manipis ‘thin’
NNG Malai manipi ‘thin’
NNG Manam manipi ‘thin’
MM Roviana manivisi ‘thin’
MM Maringe manivi ‘thin’
SES Bugotu manivi ‘thin’
SES Arosi manihi ‘thin’
NCV Ambae manivi-nivi ‘be/become shallow, low tide, thin’
NCV Raga manev-nevi ‘thin’
NCV Paamese mahini-hin ‘thin’ (metathesis)
Mic Kiribati mmani ‘thin’
Mic Ponapean menipi-nip ‘thin’
Fij Rotuman mahini ‘thin’ (metathesis)
Pn Tongan manifi ‘thin’
Pn Tongan manifi-nifi ‘comparatively thin’
Pn Samoan manifi ‘thin’
Pn Samoan mānifi-nifi ‘thin’

3. Age⇫

Two POc terms for ‘new’ can be reconstructed: the adjectival noun *paqoRu, which was also applied to animate beings in the sense of ‘young’ (Pawley 1982b), and *ka(l,r)abʷa, which has fewer reflexes, but as these occur in both MM and NCV languages, it must be reconstructed as POc. Meso-Melanesian reflexes of the latter reflect *-l-, North and Central Vanuatu reflexes reflect *-r-.

PAn *baqeRuh ‘new’ (ACD)
POc *paqoRu ‘new; young, recent’
PNGOc *paqu, *paqoRu ‘new, young’
Adm Mussau ou ‘new’
Adm Lou pa-pa-peu-n ‘new’
Adm Nyindrou haʔun ‘new’
NNG Bariai pau ‘new’
NNG Mutu pagu ‘new’
NNG Gitua pagu ‘new’
NNG Lukep pau-nu ‘new’
NNG Mangap po-po-ŋana ‘new’
NNG Kilenge pau-a ‘new’
NNG Mengen pau ‘new’
NNG Takia fau-n ‘new’
NNG Numbami wou ‘new’
NNG Yabem wakuʔ ‘new’
NNG Manam wau-wau ‘new’
SJ Sobei fe-fou ‘new’
PT Tawala wou-na ‘new’
PT Misima va-valu-na ‘new’
PT Kilivila -vau ‘new’15
MM Bali vaɣoru ‘new’
MM Nalik fakur ‘new’
MM Tabar vouru ‘new’
MM Teop von ‘new’
MM Mono haolu-na ‘new’
MM Kia fo-foru ‘new’
SES Gela vaolu ‘new; young, fresh, beautiful, in one’s prime; renew’
SES Arosi haoru ‘new, recent, youthful, vigorous’
NCV Paamese hāu ‘new’
NCV Nguna vau ‘new’
SV Sye (it)vau ‘new, clean’
SV Ura vau ‘new’
SV Lenakel vi ‘new’
Mic Woleaian fe ‘new, cleaned’
Fij Bauan vou ‘new; newly, recently’
Pn Tongan foʔou ‘new, fresh; strange, unfamiliar’
Pn Samoan fou ‘new; fresh’

POc *ka(l,r)abʷa ‘new’
MM Bulu kalaba(ka) ‘new’
MM Nakanai halaba ‘new’16
MM Tolai kalama ‘new’
NCV Tamambo haramba ‘new’
NCV Mota garagʷa ‘new’
NCV Raga gara ‘new’ (unexpected loss of final syllable)
NCV Tolomako garavu ‘new’
NCV Nduindui karaᵑgʷa ‘new’

The antonym of *paqoRu ‘new, young’ was evidently *[ma]tuqa ‘ripe, mature, adult, old’. A difficulty in reconstructing this term is its formal and semantic similarity to POc *matuqu ‘coconut growth stage: ripe, brown but has not fallen yet’ (Ross 1996d). It is sometimes quite difficult to determine which of the two reconstructions a reflex like, for example, Sursurunga matuk ‘ripe, well-developed, ready to harvest’ should be assigned to, and I suspect that reflexes of the two items have been conflated in some languages.

It is hard to avoid the conclusion that *tuqaRi ‘(be) long ago; take a long time, old (of inanimates)’ is historically related to *[ma]tuqa. If, as seems likely, Proto Buang *tkʷi ‘old’ (Patep tkʷe, Kapin takʷi) reflects *tuqaRi, then it provides evidence for the putative *-q-. However, I do not know where final *-Ri comes from. There are signs that *[ma]tuqa and *tuqaRi may occasionally have been conflated: a putative *ma-tuqaRi seems to be reflected in Gapapaiwa maturi and Tubetube matuli where *[ma]tuqa is expected, and in Tabar ma-cari where *tuqaRi is expected.

Whereas *[ma]tuqa probably referred mainly to animates and to the vegetable world, *rapu-ka (with adjectival-noun suffix *-ka added to an unidentified root *rapu) apparently modified nouns referring to lifeless objects.

PAn *CuqaS ‘mature, elder’ (ACD)
POc *[ma]tuqa ‘ripe, mature, adult, old’
Adm Lou matak ‘old person’
NNG Mengen matua ‘ripe’
PT Dobu matua ‘ripe’
PT Gapapaiwa maturi ‘half-ripe’
PT Tubetube matuli ‘ripe’
PT Misima matua ‘ripe’
MM Patpatar matuko ‘ripe’
SES Arosi maua ‘ripe’
NCV Mota matua ‘full-grown, ripe’
NCV Raga metua ‘full-grown, mature’
NCV Paamese matū ‘(s.o.) old’
NCV Nguna matua ‘old, ancient, mature, ripe, big’
SV Lenakel matak ‘ready to be eaten: ripe, cooked’
SV Anejom̃ metou ‘(fruit) ripe, mature, ready to pick’
Fij Wayan mātua ‘mature, full-grown, adult, ripe’
Fij Rotuman mafua ‘old’
Pn Tongan motuʔa ‘old’
Pn Samoan matua ‘old (person)’
POc *tuqaRi ‘(be) long ago; take a long time, old (of inanimates)’
NNG Ali care-ŋ ‘old’
MM Tabar (ma)cari ‘old’
MM Sursurunga torai-n ‘old’ (metathesised)
MM Patpatar tuare ‘old’
MM Ramoaaina turəi ‘old’ (metathesised)
MM Siar turai ‘old’ (metathesised)
MM Uruava tuari ‘old’
MM Mono tuali-na ‘old’
MM Ririo cuer ‘old (thing)’
SES Bugotu tuali ‘(thing) old’
SES Lau kwali ‘be old, worn out (house, net, etc.); descendant’17
SES Arosi wari ‘old, chiefly of living things; old man’
NCV Mota tuai ‘of long duration, old’
NCV Tamambo tuai ‘of old’
NCV Neve’ei tuɣoi ‘a long time ago’
NCV Neve’ei duɣoi ‘old (inanimates)’
NCV Naman toɣe ‘a long time ago’
NCV Nguna tuai ‘long ago, (thing) old’
SV Sye (e)twai ‘recently’
SV Sye (it-e)twai ‘long time ago’
SV Kwamera tui ‘old, previous, of the past, long ago’
SV Anejom̃ (i)tuwu ‘long ago’
Fij Wayan tuei ‘take a long time, be slow, tardy, late’
Pn Tongan tuai ‘be late, be late, take a long time’
Pn Samoan tuai ‘be late, be delayed, take a long time’

POc *rapu-ka ‘old (of inanimates)’
MM Bulu rapu-rapu-ka ‘old (of inanimates)’
SES ’Are’are rahu-ʔa ‘old (of inanimates)’
SES Sa’a lahu-ʔa ‘old (of inanimates)’

4. Colour⇫

Most reconstructable POc colour terms fall into two formal groups, adjectival verbs reflecting earlier *ma- + ROOT and adjectival nouns with either a reduplicated root, ROOT + *-ka, or both (see p.196).

PMP terms were of the form *ma- + ROOT. Blust (ACD) concludes that PMP had a classic three-term colour system, i.e. terms for black, white and red. Other terms were derived from terms for natural objects or, in the case of ‘green’, unripeness (see vol.1,155). The same comments evidently applied to POc. The three PMP terms were *ma- qitem ‘black, dark in colour’, *ma-iRaq ‘red’, and *ma-putiq ‘white, light in colour’. The first two are continued in POc *maqeto(m) and POc *meRaq. Until recently, I thought that *ma-putiq had been lost in POc and replaced by a plethora of terms, but two reflexes have been found.

PMP *[ma]qitem ‘black, deep blue’ (ACD)
PCMP *ma-qitom, *ma-qetom ‘black; dirty’
POc *maqeto(m) ‘black’
MM Nalik makit ‘black’
MM Tabar maketo ‘black’
SES Gela meto ‘dirty’
SES Arosi maeo ‘full grown, ripe, black’
NCV Mota maeto ‘black’
NCV Ambae maeto ‘be black, blacken’
NCV Raga meto ‘black’
NCV Paamese (na)meto ‘k.o. black fish’
NCV Nguna maeto ‘angry’
PMP *ma-iRaq ‘red’ (Blust 1980b)
POc *meRaq ‘red’
NNG Kaulong mhe ‘red’
NNG Kairiru mera-mer ‘red’
MM Nalik me-mek ‘red’
MM Siar me-merek ‘red’
SES Bugotu mela- ‘red’
SES Longgu mela-mela(ʔa) ‘red’
SES ’Are’are me-mera(ʔa) ‘red’
NCV Mota me-mea ‘red’
NCV Ambae memea ‘be red, redden’
NCal Xârâcùù mĩã ‘red’
Pn Tongan mea ‘reddish’
Pn Rapanui mea-mea ‘red’
Pn Rapanui mea ‘light red, pink’
PMP *ma-putiq ‘white, light in colour’ (ACD)
POc *maputi(q) ‘white’
SES Arosi mahui ‘white’
NCV Ambae mavute ‘to be white, whiten’

One colour term of the form *ma- + ROOT has no known non-Oceanic cognates. In the southeast Solomons and Micronesia we find *marawa ‘green’ competing with *[ma]karawa, indicating that both are derived from a base *rawa of unknown meaning.

POc *[ma]karawa ‘green, blue’
PT Suau ʔala-ʔalawa ‘green’
MM Tigak makago ‘green’
MM Nalik marakaua ‘green’ (metathesised)
MM Sursurunga məkrau ‘green’
MM Maringe ka-kahra ‘green, light blue’
Mic Woleaian xāẓawe-ẓaw ‘green’
Fij Rotuman čarava ‘blue’
Fij Bauan kara-karawa ‘blue; k.o. blue-green fish’
Fij Wayan karawa [V] ‘be blue, blue-green, green’
Fij Wayan kara-karawa [V, ADJ] ‘blue, blue-green, green’

PEOc *marawa ‘green, blue’
SES Talise marao ‘green, blue’
SES Longgu mʷarawa ‘green, blue’
SES Kwaio malakʷa ‘green’
SES Arosi marawā ‘green, blue (if bright)’
Mic Kiribati māwawa ‘green, blue’
Mic Marshallese maṛᵚɔṛᵚɔ ‘green’

Blust (2001) observes that colour terms with a reduplicated root are common in Oceanic languages. Generally, but not always, the initial CVCV- is copied. He infers that this reduplication reflects the unmarking of an earlier use of reduplication to express intensity. Whatever its origin, however, in many Oceanic languages reduplication is a derivational process whereby a colour term is derived from a noun, and in some it appears to be a productive process.18 Blust’s examples are drawn from twenty-four languages. Among them we find the following:

Adm Mussau bo-boŋi-e-na ‘black’ (bo ‘night’)19
Adm Mussau rae-rae-a-na ‘red’ (rae ‘blood’)20
Adm Mussau usou-usou-e-na ‘white’ (no unreduplicated root)21
Adm Mussau vero-veroŋ-a-na ‘black’ (no unreduplicated root)22
Adm Mussau riu-riu-e-na ‘thin (of animates)’ (riu ‘bone’)23
NNG Kairiru jir-jir ‘black, dirty, old’ (jir ‘mangrove swamp’)
NNG Kairiru kiet-kiet ‘black’ (kiet ‘black paint’)
NNG Kairiru pun-pun ‘white’ (pun ‘pigeon’)
NNG Kairiru mera-mer ‘red’ (mer ‘red paint’)
NNG Kairiru yaŋ-yaŋ ‘yellow’ (yaŋ ‘yellow paint, white or yellow skinned people’)

NNG Manam ziŋ-ziŋ ‘black’
NNG Manam ziŋ ‘black ashes’
NNG Manam jim-jim ‘black’
NNG Manam jim ‘rain, cloud; black, dark deep (sea)’
NNG Manam wa-wawa ‘white’
NNG Manam wawa ‘discoloured (light) patch of skin)’
NNG Manam dara-dara ‘red’
NNG Manam dara ‘blood’
NNG Manam ʔate-ʔateʔa ‘brown’
NNG Manam ʔateʔa ‘ground’
NCV Mota me-mea ‘red’
NCV Mota mea ‘red pigment’
NCV Mota mea-mea ‘k.o. red fish’
NCV Mota sor-soroga ‘dark red’
NCV Mota soroga ‘red, colour of pes nai when ripe’
NCV Mota aŋo-aŋo ‘yellow’
NCV Mota aŋo ‘turmeric; yellow’

From these examples we see that the colour term is often derived from a noun whose referent has that colour as a salient characteristic. We also see that in closely related Kairiru and Manam (Ross 1988:122–132) different derivations have occurred, indicating that the process remains productive, or has done so until recently. This observation leads to a reconstructive problem: we often find cognate reduplicated forms in a number of different languages, and it is sometimes hard to determine whether the reduplication had already occurred in POc or whether the reduplicated forms result from independent parallel derivations. We can arrange cases on a rough cline. At one extreme is POc *[yaŋo]yaŋo ‘yellow’, whose reflexes occur so consistently across Oceania that it seems over-cautious not to reconstruct it. The base form was POc *yaŋo ‘turmeric, Curcuma longa’ (Ross 1996d:216).

POc *[yaŋo]yaŋo ‘yellow’
Adm Seimat aŋo-aŋ ‘yellow’
Adm Kele aŋw-an ‘yellow’
NNG Kove yaŋo-yaŋo ‘yellow’
NNG Mutu yaŋo-ŋa ‘yellow’
NNG Lukep yoŋo-no ‘yellow’
NNG Amara aŋo-ˀaiŋo ‘yellow’
NNG Mengen ŋ-aŋo ‘yellow’
NNG Gedaged yaŋ-yaŋ ‘yellow’
NNG Numbami (me)yaŋo ‘yellow’
NNG Yabem yaŋ-yaŋ ‘yellow’
NNG Mapos Buang saŋ-saŋ ‘yellow’
NNG Manam zaŋ-zaŋ ‘yellow’
MM Vitu ɣaŋo-ɣaŋo ‘yellow’
MM Nakanai iala-lo ‘yellow’
MM West Kara iaŋ ‘yellow’ (East Kara ioŋ ‘turmeric’)
MM Taiof aŋo-m ‘yellow’
SES Gela aŋo-aŋo ‘yellow’
SES Talise aŋo ‘yellow’
NCV Mota aŋo-aŋo ‘yellow’ (aŋo ‘turmeric’)
NCV Raga aŋo-ɣa ‘yellow, become yellow’
SV Sye (mel)yeŋ ‘yellow’
SV Ura (mel)yeŋ, (un)iaŋ ‘yellow’
SV Anejom̃ yaŋ ‘yellow’
Mic Ponapean ɔŋɔ̄ŋ ‘yellow’ (ɔ̄ŋ ‘turmeric’)
Mic Woleaian yaŋo-yaŋ ‘yellow’ (yaŋ ‘ginger’)
Fij Wayan aŋo-aŋo [V, ADJ] ‘(be) yellow’
Pn Tongan eŋa-eŋa ‘yellow’ (eŋa ‘turmeric’)

Nearer the other extreme are reduplicated reflexes of POc *draRaq ‘blood’ (e.g. Mussau rae-rae-ana ‘red’ and Manam dara-dara ‘red’ above). Here, reflexes have a much spottier distribution, closely related languages often have different forms for ‘red’, and other terms for ‘blood’ are also reduplicated to form terms for ‘red’. These facts suggest that the reduplicated forms reflect independent parallel development and that there is not sufficient evidence for a POc reconstruction **draRa-draRaq ‘red’.

In this connection, it is worth noting that a number of reflexes of POc *meRaq ‘red’ and *karawa ‘green, blue’, reconstructed above, also display reduplication. Since there were originally morphologically complex forms (*ma-iRaq and *ka-rawa), and *meRaq, at least, was originally an adjectival verb, these reduplications can be attributed to analogy. That is, reduplication has moved in a number of languages from being a process which derives colour terms from nouns to being simply a marker of a colour term. This suggests that we should be very cautious about reconstructing POc reduplicated colour terms.

Despite the need for caution, the fact that Blust finds reduplicated colour terms scattered across Oceania suggests quite strongly that this derivational process was already present in POc. It is true, as Blust notes, that the unreduplicated root often does not occur in the data. This may be because it has been lost or simply because its meaning is such that it has not been recorded in available sources (‘black’ is far more likely to be recorded, for example, than the term ‘mangrove morass’ from which it is derived in a number of languages).

What is much less clear is the relationship of this POc reduplication to derivations with *-ka. Forms with a reduplicated root, ROOT + *-ka, or both, tend to cooccur in cognate sets. Note Longgu mela-mela(ʔa) and ’Are’Are me-mera(ʔa) ‘red’ and Raga aŋo-ɣa ‘yellow’ above. Reflexes of *-ka also crop up in Blust’s collection of reduplicated colour terms in Mussau and Vitu and in To’aba’ita (SES). Since these three languages belong to different primary subgroups of Oceanic (St Matthias, Western Oceanic and Eastern Oceanic respectively), it is possible that reduplicated colour terms with *-ka also occurred in POc. If so, however, we still have to account for reduplicated forms without *-ka (like those listed under *[yaŋo]yaŋo ‘yellow’ above) and for unreduplicated forms with *-ka. The simplest solution is to reconstruct two POc processes: (i) ROOT + *-ka forming adjectival nouns and (ii) CVCV- reduplication forming colour terms and perhaps some other property terms.24 Whether the words formed by process (ii) were verbs or nouns is uncertain. In some languages, and particularly for colour terms, the two processes combined, forming adjectival nouns.

In the light of this discussion, I reconstruct two pairs of POc colour terms, *keja-ka, *[keja]keja ‘green’ and *biRiŋ-(k)a, *[biRi]biRiŋ ‘dark hue, dirty’, but I cannot be sure that both members of each pair actually occurred in POc. The Tamambo reflex of the root *keja refers to a kind of blue-green fish, and this may have been its POc meaning. POc *biRiŋ perhaps meant ‘dirt’.

POc *keja-ka, *[keja]keja ‘green’
NNG Mangap kes-keeze(ŋa-) ‘green’
NNG Sio kenza ‘green’
NNG Apalik -kes-kes ‘green’
NNG Bebeli ke-kese ‘green’
NNG Mindiri kiede ‘green’
NNG Bilibil yed-yed ‘green’
MM Nakanai ka-kesa ‘green’
NCV Mota gesa-gesa(ga) ‘bright blue, or bright green’
NCV Raga geha(ga) ‘blue-green’
NCV Tamambo ɣenja(ɣa) ‘blue-green’ (ɣenja ‘k.o. blue-green fish’)
NCV Nguna kesa-kesa ‘blue’
Pn Tikopia kesa ‘green, yellow-green, with suggestion of off-colour; greyish-green’
PMP *biRiŋ ‘dark hue, dark red (?)’ (ACD)
POc *biRiŋ-(k)a, *[biRi]biRiŋ ‘dark hue, dirty’
NNG Kove vihi-vihiŋa ‘green’
NNG Aria -vir ‘green’
MM Tiang biliŋə ‘dirty’
MM Madak biliŋa ‘dirty’
MM Patpatar biliŋe ‘dirty’
SES Gela bili-bilia ‘dirty’
SES Kwaio bili-biliʔa ‘dirty’

There is one other reduplicated colour term which may be reconstructable, POc *[pula]pula-n ‘white’, probably derived from *pulan ‘moon’. However, the dangers of reconstructing reduplicated colour terms in POc apply here too, and these terms may be independent innovations.

PMP *bulan ‘white’ (Blust 1989)
POc *[pula]pula-n ‘white’
NNG Sissano owul-wul ‘white’
NNG Psohoh vul-vul ‘white’
Fij Bauan vula-vula ‘white’
NCal Nemi pulo ‘white’

5. Physical property⇫

5.1. Shape and surface texture⇫

Terms denoting the shape and surface texture of an object include the meanings such as ‘flat’, ‘round’, ‘rough’, ‘smooth’, ‘straight’ and ‘crooked’. However, it seems that there were few POc lexemes with basic meanings in this domain. No word for ‘round’ is reconstructable. The main term for ‘flat’ was probabaly POc *baban ‘flat; board, plank; canoe strake; flat shelf of rock’, and we can be reasonably confident that it was a noun denoting a flat surface or flat plank-like object (vol.1,58, 185).

POc *baban ‘flat; board, plank; canoe strake; flat shelf of rock’
NNG Mutu babaga ‘wide’
NNG Mangap baba(ŋa-n) ‘wide, broad’
NNG Gedaged baba(ŋa-n) ‘wide’
NNG Manam baba ‘flat; palm of the hand’
PT Motu papa ‘flat rock’
MM Teop babana(o) ‘wide’
SES Kwaio baba ‘flat’
SES Lau baba ‘flat; long side board of canoe’
Pn Tongan papa ‘flat hard sandstone forming a layer or bed at the coast in certain places; flat and smooth and hard, as a well-trodden track; board’
Pn Samoan papa ‘rock; floor mat; plain, level, flat, as a rock, board, nose, etc.’

The term *raba(r) may have denoted the property ‘flat’, but there are too few Oceanic reflexes to be certain. Indeed, if the Tongan reflex is regularly descended from a POc forebear, then the latter had initial *l-, not *r-. This suggests that the Polynesian terms may not reflect POc *raba(r).

PMP *da(m)paD ‘flat, level’ (ACD)
POc *raba(r) ‘flat, wide, broad’
Fij Bauan raba [N] ‘breadth, width’; [ADJ] ‘broad, wide’
Fij Nadrogā raba ‘wide, broad’
cf. also:
Pn Tongan lafa-lafa ‘flat’
Pn Samoan lafa-lafa ‘flat; the level top of a mountain’

No term for ‘rough’ is reconstructable, but ‘smooth’, also with the sense ‘slippery’ was POc *madrali(s,t).

PAn *ma-dalis ‘smooth, slippery’ (ACD)
PAn *[ma]dalit ‘smooth, slippery’ (Blust 1986)
POc *madrali(s,t) ‘smooth, slippery’
MM Siar ma-madal ‘smooth’
SES Gela madali ‘slippery’
SES Arosi madari ‘wet and slippery, as rocks’

One shape concept for which POc evidently had terms was ‘straight, level’. Reflexes of these terms often also include ‘true’ among their meanings, but I assume that the metaphorical extension was from shape to value (i.e. from visible to abstract), rather than vice versa.

The data require that we reconstruct two variants for each of the three terms. Thus we reconstruct not only *[ma]koto, whose canonic shape suggests that it is the inherited term, but also *ta-kodos, which is derived from *kodos ‘go straight; straighten’ (see p.196).25 I suspect that the verbs *[ma]koto and *kodos were separately inherited into POc (although no non-Oceanic cognates have been found) and that their formal similarity is attributable to derivation at an earlier stage, as POc *-t- and *-d- reflect PMP *-t- and *-nt- respectively. The Polynesian reflexes are attributed to the set with *-t- because of their similarity in meaning to Bauan koto. Formally, they could at least as well reflect POc *ta-kodos.

POc *[ma]koto ‘straight’
MM Vitu maɣoto ‘straight; (ground) flat’
MM Tolai ot ‘straight’
SES Gela oto ‘go directly, straight; set face to do, stare straight at’ (for expected *ɣoto)
SES West Guadalcanal ɣoto ‘straight, correct’
Fij Bauan koto [V] ‘lie down’; [ADJ] ‘extended, stretched out’
Pn Tongan to-koto [V] ‘lie down’
Pn Samoan ta-ʔoto [V] ‘lie down’
Pn Māori ta-koto [V] ‘lie down’
POc *kodos ‘go straight; straighten’
POc *ta-kodos ‘straight’
MM Lavongai koroŋ ‘straight’
MM Lamasong tokodos ‘straight’
MM Patpatar takodas ‘straight’
MM Tolai kodo ‘straighten’
MM Tolai takodo ‘straight’
MM Nehan kod-kodoh ‘straight’
SES Lau odo-odo ‘go in a direct line, straight’
SES Kwaio odo ‘straight, correct’
SES Sa’a odo-odo ‘be straight, go straight forward; be correct and proper’
SES Arosi odo-odo ‘straight’
POc *tonuq ‘straight, correct’
NNG Bam tun-tunu ‘straight’
NNG Numbami tonowa ‘straight’
PT Minaveha tunuɣa ‘straight’
PT Minaveha tunu-tunuɣa ‘do right, be righteous’
PT Iduna tunu-tunuɣ(ina) ‘straight (of objects, path), upright, honest’
PT Molima tunu-tunv(ina) ‘straight, flat’
MM Laghu to-tonu ‘straight’
NCV Nokuku ta-tino ‘true’
NCV Kiai tu-tunu ‘good, straight, sweet’
NCV Uripiv (were)tun ‘tell truth’
NCV West Ambrym ten ‘real’
NCV Southeast Ambrym (rei)tin ‘true’
NCV Lonwolwol ten ‘real’
NCV Lonwolwol (fɪ)tɛn ‘true; truly’
NCV North Ambrym (fɛ)tɪn ‘true; truly’
NCV Paamese tine ‘true’
NCV Avava (ba)rīn ‘true’
PPn *tonu ‘straight, correct’ (POLLEX)
Pn Tongan tonu ‘exact, correct, be right’
Pn Niuean tonu ‘proper, right’
Pn Samoan tonu ‘exact, correct, just’
Pn Tuvalu tonu ‘straight, correct’
Pn Ifira-Mele tō-tonu ‘right, correct’
Pn Tikopia tonu ‘right, correct, true, exact’
cf. also:
NNG Mangap du-dūŋ ‘real, correct, straight’
NNG Malai dunu(ŋa) ‘straight’
SES Bugotu jino ‘straight, right, righteous’ (-i- for †-u-)
NCV Mota nun ‘true, truth’
SV Kwamera a-tuən ‘implies straightening’ (verbal adjunct)
Fij Bauan donu ‘straight, correct, true’
Fij Wayan donu ‘right, correct, true’

I have no explanation for the pair *mʷane-mʷane and *wane-wane. Reflexes of the former occur in the Admiralties, Southeast Solomonic and New Caledonia, of the latter in the Schoutens and Micronesia. However, if the Ali reflex were non-cognate, then *wane-wane would simply be a Nuclear Micronesian innovation.

POc *mʷane-mʷane ‘straight, direct; flat, level’ (ACD)
Adm Aua wane-wane ‘smooth, level; straight’26
Adm Pak mʷane-n ‘straight’
Adm Nyindrou mone-n ‘straight’
Adm Loniu mʷɛnɛ-n ‘straight’
SES Gela mae-mane ‘straight’
SES Lau ma-mana ‘true’
NCal Cèmuhî mó-mʷɔn ‘straight, right, correct’
POc *wane-wane ‘straight, direct; flat, level’ (ACD)
NNG Ali wane(ŋ) ‘straight’
Mic Mortlockese wane-wan ‘straight, steady, direct’
Mic Puluwatese wene-wen ‘be directly above; straight, direct, honest, exactly’; ‘greatly’
Mic Woleaian were-were ‘straight, steady, still’

The only antonym of the terms above is PWOc *kalis ‘crooked’, which is only weakly attested.

PWOc *kalis ‘crooked’
NNG Takia kael(a-n) ‘crooked’
MM Sursurunga kalis ‘crooked’

5.2. Weight⇫

Forms for ‘heavy’ are morphologically complex. POc *[pa]pat reflects the base *pat, POc *ma-pat and *mamat reflect prefixation with *ma- and *maN- respectively (the function of *maN- in this context is unclear; cf. vol.1,29). The term for ‘light’ (in weight) is *[ma]Raqan.

POc *[pa]pat ‘heavy’
NNG Gitua pat(aŋa-n) ‘heavy’
NNG Maleu -pat(aŋa) ‘heavy’
NNG Yabem (ŋa)wapaʔ ‘heavy’

POc *mapat ‘heavy’ (ACD)
Adm Nyindrou mahaʔ(an) ‘heavy’
SJ Sobei mafo ‘heavy’
MM Bulu mava ‘heavy’
MM Ramoaaina məvət ‘heavy’
SES Gela mava ‘heavy, important’
NCV Ambae mava ‘be/become heavy’
Fij Rotuman maha ‘heavy’
Pn Tongan ma-mafa ‘heavy’
Pn Tongan mafas-ia ‘(be) weighed down, burdened’
Pn Tongan mafat-aki ‘(rain) be heavy; (work) be heavy, difficult’
Pn Samoan ma-mafa ‘heavy’
Pn Samoan mafat-ia ‘exhausted, overcome’
POc *mamat ‘heavy’
Adm Mussau mamāta(na) ‘heavy’
MM Tolai mamat ‘heavy’
MM Roviana mamata ‘heavy’
PMP *[ma]Raqan ‘light in weight’ (ACD)
POc *[ma]Raqan ‘light in weight’
PT Motu haraɣa ‘easy, light (in weight)’
NNG Bariai malan ‘light in weight’
NNG Sio malalɒka ‘light in weight’
NNG Tami malaga-lag ‘light in weight’
NNG Aria mar̃kan ‘light in weight’
MM Vitu maraɣa ‘light in weight’
MM Nakanai mara-mara ‘lightened, relieved’
SES Gela ma-mala ‘light in weight’
NCV Ambae ma-marae ‘be/become light’
NCV Raga ma-mara ‘light in weight’
NCV Paamese melā-la ‘light in weight’
Mic Ponapean marā-ra ‘light in weight’
Fij Nadrogā mā-mā ‘light in weight’
Fij Wayan mā-mā ‘be light (in weight)’
Pn Tongan maʔa-maʔa ‘light in weight’
Pn Samoan mā-mā ‘light in weight’

5.3. Strength, toughness and speed⇫

Oceanic speakers tend to express the cluster of concepts ‘hard’ (of physical substances), ‘strong’ (of human beings), ‘quickly moving’ and ‘energetic’ with a single lexeme, and ‘soft’, ‘weak’, ‘slow’ and ‘gentle’ also with a single lexeme. Terms for the first, again due entirely to Blust (ACD), are POc *paka(s) and *laga(s), neither of them particularly stable (i.e. we find few reflexes of them). Terms for its antonym are *[ma]lumu and *ma-luas, both quite stable and thus widely reflected. The latter is also used of calm weather in eastern Oceanic languages (see Ch. 5, §5.1).

PMP *ba(ŋ)kas ‘swift, strong, energetic, fast’ (ACD)
POc *paka(s) ‘have strength, energy’ (ACD)
NCV Mota vaka ‘have strength, energy’
PMP *la(ŋ)kas ‘spirited, energetic’ (ACD)
POc *laga(s) ‘spirited, energetic’ (ACD)
MM Sursurunga lak-lak ‘hard, stubborn’
SES Gela laga ‘strong, strength; energetic’
SES Arosi raga ‘strong, strengthened, invigorated’

Two POc terms, *[ma]lumu and *ma-luas, express ‘soft, gentle’.

PMP *[ma]lumu ‘soft, tender, gentle’ (ACD)
POc *[ma]lumu ‘soft, gentle, easy’
NNG Bariai marum ‘soft’
NNG Amara mulum ‘soft’
MM Nakanai malumo ‘be soft (bread or sweet biscuits, or taro left too long in the ground)’
MM Lavongai malum ‘soft’
MM Patpatar ma-malum ‘soft’
MM Mono maluŋ ‘soft’
SES Gela malumu ‘easy’
SES Kwaio malumu ‘good-looking’
SES Arosi rumu ‘oil’
SES Arosi marumu-rumu ‘soft’
NCV Mota malum-lum ‘soft, gentle’
NCV Ambae lu-lumu ‘be/become sweet, good tasting’
NCV Raga lumu-lumu ‘soft’
NCV Tamambo ma-lu-lum ‘soft’
Fij Bauan malumu ‘weak, faint, sick, soft’
PPn *malū ‘soft (of a substance), calm (of day, sea)’ (irregular loss of *-m- in all Polynesian reflexes)
Pn Tongan malū ‘soft, tender, flexible; (weather) mild, pleasantly calm; (pain) abated’
Pn Niuean molū ‘soft, weak, humble’
Pn Samoan malū ‘(substance) soft; (sea +) calm; (voice) bass’
Pn East Uvean malū ‘calm, peaceful’
Pn East Futunan malū ‘soft’
Pn Rennellese magū ‘be soft, be slack’
Pn Tahitian marū ‘soft, gentle, easy’

POc *ma-luas ‘soft’
NNG Sio malɒe ‘limp, squishy, soft’
MM Notsi məlus ‘soft’
MM Konomala ma-mlas ‘soft’
MM Siar ma-maluas ‘soft’
MM Ramoaaina məl-məluə ‘soft’
MM Nehan mal-malua-n ‘soft’
SES Gela malua ‘soft’
SES ’Are’are mārū-rū ‘soft, gentle, flexible’
Mic Ponapean malu-n ‘calm, of the sea’
Mic Mokilese molu-n ‘calm or fine, of weather’
Mic Mortlockese maləwa-ləw ‘peaceful’
Mic Puluwatese malɨwa-lɨ ‘to be easy or slow, to be calm (as the sea), to be gentle’
Fij Bauan mālua ‘gently, slowly, quietly’

5.4. Content⇫

Three terms meaning ‘full’ are reconstructable. The first, *ponuq, is the general term. It is not clear to me how *puŋu and *poju differed in meaning from this and from each other. However, *puŋu may simply be a doublet of *ponuq. The term *poju seems to be a reflex of PMP *besuR ‘satiated’. The opposite meaning, ‘empty’, seems to have been expressed by *[ma]maca ‘dry’ (p.226), at least when ‘empty of liquid’ was intended.

PMP *ponuq ‘full’
POc *ponuq ‘full’
NNG Bariai -won ‘full’
NNG Lukep -pon ‘full’
NNG Mengen ponu ‘full’
NNG Wogeo -won ‘full’
NNG Kaiep -wun ‘full’
PT Motu honu ‘full’
PT Mekeo poŋu ‘full’
MM Bali vonuku ‘full’
MM Meramera vonu ‘full; swell’
MM Nakanai volu ‘full’
MM Lihir on ‘full’
MM Nehan won ‘full’
MM Mono honu ‘full’
SES Gela vonu ‘full’
SES Talise vonu ‘full’
SES Longgu vonu ‘full’
SES Kwaio fonu ‘full’
SES Arosi honu ‘full’
NCal Nemi punuk ‘full’
Mic Kiribati on ‘full’
Pn Tongan fonu ‘full’

POc *puŋu ‘full’
NNG Maleu -uŋ ‘full’
NNG Middle Watut (ri)fuᵑg ‘full’
NNG Sukurum fuaŋ ‘full’
MM Lamasong -uŋ ‘full’
MM Patpatar huŋ ‘full’
SES Lau fuŋu ‘full’
SES Kwai fuŋu ‘full’
PAn *besuR ‘satisfied from having eaten enough, satiated’ (ACD)
POc *poju ‘full’
Adm Mussau pasu ‘full’
MM East Kara vəs ‘full’
MM Notsi us ‘full’
MM Tabar vosu ‘full’
MM Teop (ha)pus ‘full’
MM Maringe fodu ‘full’

5.5. Temperature⇫

The reconstruction of terms for ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ is tricky, because the English words have a number of senses for which Oceanic speakers use different words or phrases. The English use of ‘cold’ to denote a sickness is set aside here. Some Oceanic languages distinguish between

  1. a person feeling cold (the sense §4.8.1 is concerned with),
  2. a substance being cold to the touch, and
  3. the air, wind or weather being cold.

Thus in To’aba’ita the terms are (a) tega or aqai, (b) gʷari, and (c) ʔoleʔoleʔa. However, there is a twist: (a) may also be gʷa-gʷari, a reduplicated form of (b) (Lichtenberk 2008).

In Dobu (a) and (c) are both gogai, and (b) is gonituna, or goyuyuwana if the cold substance is water (Lithgow & Lithgow 2006).

Very few of the available dictionaries differentiate the senses of ‘cold’ as carefully as these two, so there is a data problem. This is compounded, as seen in both To’aba’ita and Dobu, by the fact that a term may span two of the three senses. Much the same is true of words for ‘hot’.

Although it may be assumed that POc made distinctions of the kind listed above, it is not possible to determine accurately how reconstructed terms for ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ related to (a), (b) and (c).

5.5.1. Feeling cold⇫

There are several POc forms for ‘cold’ which are derived ultimately from PMP *diŋin ‘cold’. However, Chamorro maniŋhiŋ ‘cold’ reflects PMP *maN-diŋdiŋ (Blust 1970:133), and it can be assumed that the POc forms reflect the PMP reduplicated root *diŋdiŋ. The expected POc form of the root is *ridriŋ, which is plentifully reflected, but this has been subject to assimilations and perhaps metathesis at various post-POc interstages. The root alone is reflected as POc *ridri(ŋ), or *riri(ŋ) ‘shiver’ (with assimilation of medial *-dr- to initial *r-).

Forms for ‘cold’ consist of one of the prefixes *ma-, *maN- and *maka- + *ridriŋ, giving expected POc forms *ma-ridriŋ, *madridriŋ (from *maN-ridriŋ) and *maka-ridriŋ, all of which are reflected in present-day Oceanic languages. Matters are complicated by the fact that forms are also found which appear to reflect *ma-ririŋ, *madririŋ, i.e. with medial *-dr- replaced by *-r-. There are several possible explanations of these forms, including assimilation, dissimilation and metathesis, but these are ignored here as their distribution in the data suggests that they are local innovations. This means that in a few cases forms reflecting *ma-ridriŋ may have been attributed to *madridriŋ, and vice versa.

It is possible that the forms here attributed to POc *madridriŋ are actually all reflexes of *ma-ridriŋ that have undergone assimilation of root-initial *-r- to medial *dr-. However, their wide distribution speaks against this. As *madridriŋ reflects *maN-ridriŋ, and *maN- has an agentive implication, the question arises, How could a term for ‘cold’ be agentive? The answer is perhaps that it denoted coldness of weather, and there is a sense in which weather can be regarded as agentive (‘causing shivering’): ‘cold (of weather)’ is the gloss assigned to PMP *maN-diŋdiŋ by Zorc (2007).

We take *ma-ridriŋ and *maka-ridriŋ both to have meant ‘feel cold’, but their meanings may have been wider than this. No semantic difference between them is discernible.

PMP *ma-diŋdiŋ ‘cold’ (Blust 1970)
POc *ma-ridri(ŋ) ‘(s.o.) be cold’
NNG Mutu marir ‘(s.o.) cold’ (final -r for †-d)
NNG Apalik miri-n ‘(s.o.) cold’ (or < POc *madridriŋ)
NNG Bebeli merir ‘(s.o.) cold’ (or < POc *madridriŋ)
NNG Kaiep marir ‘(s.o.) cold’ (or < POc *madridriŋ)
NNG Kairiru -merir ‘(s.o.) cold’ (or < POc *madridriŋ)
SJ Kayupulau mariri-e ‘(s.o.) cold’ (or < POc *madridriŋ)
NCV Mota ma-marir ‘cold’ (final -r for †-n)
NCV Merlav marir ‘cold’ (final -r for †-n)
NCV Kiai (sarsara)mariri ‘tremble (as in malaria)’
NCV Namakir miladi-n ‘cold’ (-l- for †-r-)
NCV Nguna malādi ‘cold’ (-l- for †-r-)
PMP *mandiŋ-diŋ ‘cold’ (Blust 1970)
POc *madridriŋ ‘be cold’
Adm Aua maxixi ‘cold’
Adm Mondropolon madri ‘cold’
NNG Takia madid ‘(s.o.) cold’
NNG Manam madidi ‘cold’
NNG Ulau-Suain madid ‘(s.o.) cold’
NNG Mengen ma-mariri ‘(s.o.) cold’
MM Nakanai magigi ‘to shake (as in epilepsy)’
MM Tolai madiriŋ ‘cold (water, food)’ (-r- for †-d-)
MM Halia maririŋ ‘(s.o.) cold’
NCV Raga masisi ‘cold’
NCV Kiai makiki ‘cold’
NCV West Ambrym marid ‘cold’
NCV Uripiv -me-mr̃ali ‘cold, cool’ (-l- for †-r̃-)
NCV Paamese madil ‘cold’ (-l for †-r)
PMic *maci, *macici ‘be cold’ (Bender et al. 2003)
Mic Kiribati mariri ‘feel cold’
Mic Kosraean miṣiṣ ‘cold, chilly, cool, goosebumps’
Mic Marshallese məṛ ‘cooled off (of food once hot)’
Fij Rotuman matiti ‘cold’
PMP *maka-diŋdiŋ ‘cold’ (Blust 1970)
POc *maka-ridriŋ ‘(s.o.) be cold’
MM Nakanai maka-rigi ‘cold, be cold’
MM Notsi maka-dil ‘(s.o.) cold’
SES Bauro maɣā-risi ‘cold’
NCV Tamambo maɣa-riri ‘cold’ (second -r- for †-d-)
PPn *maka-lili ‘cold, chilly’ (POLLEX)
Pn Niuean maka-lili ‘cold, chilly’
Pn Samoan maʔa-lili [VI] ‘feel cold, shiver’; [N] ‘cold (weather)’
Pn East Futunan maka-lili ‘cold, chilly’
Pn East Uvean maka-lili ‘chilly’
Pn Tuvalu maka-lili ‘cold, shiver’
Pn West Futunan maka-ligi ‘cold’
Pn Nukuoro maga-lili ‘feel cold, shiver’
Pn Sikaiana maka-lili ‘shiver, tremble, fever’
Pn Luangiua mā-lili ‘cold, chilly’
Pn Anutan maka-riri ‘cold’
Pn Tikopia maka-riri ‘coldness; shiver from malaria’
Pn Tikopia kaka-riri ‘coldness’
Pn Hawaiian maʔa-lili ‘cooled’
Pn Mangarevan maka-riri ‘cold, chilly’
Pn Māori maka-riri [VI] ‘feel cold, cold (of weather)’; [N] ‘cold’

Another cognate set meaning ‘cold’ appears to reflect both *malaso ‘cold (verb)’ and *malaso-ŋ ‘cold (noun)’.

POc *malaso [VI] ‘be cold’
POc *malaso-ŋ [N] ‘cold’
NNG Roinji malasu(na) ‘(s.o.) cold’
NNG Wab malsuŋ ‘cold’
NNG Bing malsoŋ ‘cold’
NNG Mindiri malas ‘cold’
NNG Megiar malas ‘(s.o.) cold’
MM Nehan malahoŋ ‘(s.o.) cold’
SES Gela malaho ‘cold, chill’
NCV Mota malaso [N] ‘cold’
NCV Uripiv melas [N] ‘cold’
SV Southwest Tanna (ə)mla ‘be cold’

Finally, the cognate set below has an uneven distribution, but the correspondence is good.

POc *(p,pʷ)o(q)ut ‘be cold’
MM Nehan pous-pous-pousu ‘stiff, numb with cold’
MM Petats pout ‘(s.o.) cold’
MM Halia bout ‘(water) cold’
PMic *fou ‘feel cold’
Mic Marshallese (pi)yaw ‘chilly, cool’
Mic Mokilese pow ‘feel cold’
Mic Mokilese (ko)pow ‘feel cold (of people)’
Mic Chuukese fə̄w ‘cold, be cold’
Mic Chuukese əffə̄w ‘chills’
Mic Chuukese a-ffə̄w ‘be cold to the touch’
Mic Woleaian fø̄ʉ ‘be cold, cool, shiver’
Mic Woleaian (xaẓi)fø̄ʉ ‘be cold, chilly’
Mic Carolinian ffōy, ffə̄y ‘feel cold’

5.5.2. Feeling hot⇫

Three terms are reconstructable for ‘hot, warm’, POc *[ma]panas, POc *maŋini(t) and POc *tunu-tunu. The first was probably the general term, to judge from its distribution and its glosses, whilst *maŋini(t) probably had some specialised sense. The third was apparently derived from the verb POc *tunu ‘roast on embers or in fire’ (vol.1:293).

PMP *[ma]panas ‘be/become warm, hot (of fire, sun, fever, water)’ (ACD)
POc *[ma]panas ‘warm, hot’
POc *pa-panas-i- ‘warm (s.t.) up’
Adm Mussau anasa ‘(s.o.) hot’
NNG Kove wana-wana ‘(s.o.) hot’
NNG Tami wa-wan ‘(s.o.) hot’
NNG Arawe ka-wanes ‘(s.o.) hot’
NNG Takia wana-na-n ‘hot’
NNG Numbami wa-wana ‘hot’
NNG Mapos Buang vanɛ ‘hot’
SJ Sobei me-fna ‘(s.o.) hot’
MM Tigak ma-nas ‘(s.o.) hot’
MM Ramoaaina vu-van ‘(s.o.) hot’
SES Gela pa-pana ‘heat up (food)’
SES Longgu pa-pana ‘be warm’
SES Longgu pa-panaz-i- ‘warm (s.o.)’
SES Bauro ma-hana ‘warm’
SV Kwamera -a-pʷan-a-pʷan ‘hot’
SV Anejom̃ a-hen-hen ‘warm, hot’
Fij Rotuman mah-mahana ‘warm’
PPn *ma-fana ‘be warm’
PPn *faka-fana ‘warm (s.t.) up’ (POLLEX)
Pn Tongan ma-fana ‘warm (of food, water, drink); unpleasantly warm, stuffy (of room)’
Pn Tongan mā-fana ‘warmth; warm (of country, time, day); pleasantly warm’
Pn Niuafo’ou mā-fana ‘warm’
Pn Niuean ma-fana ‘warm’
Pn Niuean faka-fana ‘warm up (as food)’
Pn Samoan mā-fana-fana ‘warm’
Pn Samoan faʔa-fana ‘reheat, warm up food’
Pn Tuvalu ma-fana ‘warm, re-bake’
Pn East Futunan mā-fana ‘warm’
Pn East Futunan faka-fana ‘warm up cold food’
Pn Sikaiana mā-hana ‘warm’
Pn Luangiua ma-haŋa ‘warm; feverish’
Pn Takuu ma-fana ‘(of water, etc. but not weather) warm; feverish’
Pn Hawaiian ma-hana ‘warm’
Pn Tahitian ma-hana-hana ‘warm’
Pn Mangarevan maʔana ‘warm’
PMP *maN-qinit ‘hot, warm’ (ACD: *qinit ‘heat, warmth’)
POc *maŋini(t) ‘become hot, warm (?)’
MM Lungga maŋini ‘warm’
MM Roviana maŋini ‘warm’
MM Hoava maŋini ‘warm’

The reflexes of the term below suggest the form †*tun-tunu, but the phonotactics and reduplication patterns of POc require *tunu-tunu, even though the second of the four instances of *-u- happens not to be reflected in the cognate set below.

POc *tunu-tunu ‘hot’
Adm Lou tuntun-an ‘feel hot’
NNG Malai tun-tunu ‘hot’
NNG Gitua tun-tun ‘hot’
MM Sursurunga tun-tun ‘warm (as house), tepid (as water)’
MM Konomala tun-tun ‘(s.o.) hot’
PNCV *tu-tunu ‘warm, hot’ (Clark 2009: *tunu)
NCV Mota tu-tun ‘warm, hot’
NCV Nokuku tu-tunu ‘warm, hot’
NCV Uripiv o-tu-tun ‘hot’
Fij Wayan tu-tunu ‘be warm, not very hot; tepid’

5.6. Wet and dry⇫

The English words ‘dry’ and ‘wet’ are polysemous. The meanings of ‘dry’ include ‘free from moisture’, ‘having lost natural moisture’ and ‘not in or under water’. POc terms with such meanings are reconstructed below. POc presumably also had words for various meanings of ‘wet’, but I have been able to reconstruct only POc *buluk, in the meaning ‘soaked, waterlogged’.

POc *buluk ‘be wet, soaked, waterlogged’
NNG Bilibil polo ‘wet’
MM Lavongai vuluk ‘wet’
MM Ramoaaina polo [V] ‘wet, muddy, swampy’; [N] ‘liquid, fluid’
Fij Wayan bulu-bulu ‘be sticky, gluey, adhesive, cloggy, e.g. of clay or cloggy soil, too wet and lumpy to dig’
Pn Niuean (faka)pulu ‘steep in water, ferment’
Pn Mangarevan puru ‘soaked’
Pn Tahitian puru ‘soaked, waterlogged’
Pn Hawaiian pulu ‘soaked’

The most widely reflected POc term with a ‘dry’ meaning is *[ma]maca, which denoted states in which otherwise present liquid was absent. Thus it was used among other things of food which had dried up through overcooking and of low tide (Ch. 4, §2.6). POc *maaŋo ‘wither, dry up’ referred particularly to the dryness of dying vegetation and meant ‘withered, dry’ (vol.1,135).

POc *karaŋo is obviously formally related to *[ma]raŋo, but its reflexes display the meanings both of this and of *[ma]maca. POc *goRu appears to have been a synonym of *maaŋo.

PMP *maja ‘be dry’
POc *[ma]maca [V] ‘dry up, evaporate, be empty of liquid’; [N] ‘low tide’
Adm Aua mamaha ‘dry’
NNG Kove mamasa ‘dry’
NNG Mutu mamas ‘(food +) dry up’
NNG Mangap mamāza-ŋana ‘dry’
NNG Tami mamat ‘dry’
NNG Roinji mamasa-na ‘dry’
NNG Bing mas-mamasa ‘low tide’
NNG Bing mamsa-s ‘dry’
NNG Numbami mamasa ‘dry’
NNG Wogeo mamasa ‘dry’
NNG Kairiru -mamas ‘dry’
SJ Kayupulau mamaxe ‘dry’
PT Gumawana mamaya ‘low tide, shore’
MM Meramera mamasa ‘low tide’
MM Lihir mas ‘(food +) dry up’
MM Patpatar mamasa ‘dry’
MM Tolai mamā ‘lowtide’
MM Siar mas-mas ‘(food +) dry up; low tide’
MM Roviana masa ‘lowtide’
SES Gela mamaha ‘dry’
SES Arosi mamata ‘dry’
NCV Raga mamaha ‘dry’
NCV Ambae mamaha ‘be/become dry’
NCV Tamambo mamasa ‘dry (of ground +)’
NCV Paamese mes ‘dry’
Fij Bauan maða ‘be empty, be dry’
Fij Bauan mamaða ‘dry, be dry’
SV North Tanna mas ‘lowtide’
SV Kwamera maha ‘lowtide, empty of liquid’
Pn Tongan mamaha ‘lowtide’
Pn Samoan masa ‘be shallow’

PCEMP *[ma]Raŋaw below leads us to expect POc *[ma]Raŋo, but the cognate set apparently reflects POc *[ma]raŋo, as the Bugotu, Sa’a and Tape items unambiguously reflect *r, not *R. However, the Niuean and Samoan items under ‘cf also’ reflect POc *maRaŋo (*R is lost in Central Pacific languages but *r isn’t). This implies that *[ma]Raŋo and an idiosyncratic *[ma]raŋo co-occurred in early Oceanic. As Mussau, NNG and MM languages merge POc *r and *R, they may reflect either form. Hence reconstructed *[ma][R,r]aŋo.

POc *[ma-]raŋo ‘become withered (of vegetation)’
NNG Manam ma-raŋo ‘dry, arid’
MM Tolai ma-raŋa ‘withered, dry (leaves, husk, tree)’
MM Selau raŋo ‘dry’
SES Bugotu raŋo ‘wither (leaves, yam vines)’; ‘wither (leaves, ŋam vines)’
SES Sa’a raŋo ‘be withered, dry (esp. yams when vine withers)’; ‘be withered, dry (esp. ŋams when vine withers)’
SES Arosi raŋo ‘withered, dead (of grass, green boughs +)’
NCV Mota raŋo ‘become dried up in the course of nature’
PCEMP *[ma]Raŋaw ‘dry’ (ACD)
POc *[ma]raŋo ‘become withered (of vegetation)’
Adm Mussau malaŋo ‘dry’
NNG Manam maraŋo ‘dry, arid’
MM Patpatar maraŋa ‘dry coconut’
MM Tolai maraŋa ‘withered, dry (leaves, husk, tree)’
MM Selau raŋo ‘dry’
SES Bugotu raŋo ‘wither (leaves, yam vines)’; ‘wither (leaves, ŋam vines)’
SES Sa’a raŋo ‘be withered, dry (esp. yams when vine withers)’; ‘be withered, dry (esp. ŋams when vine withers)’
SES Arosi raŋo ‘withered, dead (of grass, green boughs +)’
NCV Mota raŋo ‘become dried up in the course of nature’
NCV Tape məraŋ ‘(of wood, leaves) dry’ (J. Lŋnch, pers. comm.)
SV Kwamera (kahi)mareŋi ‘turning brown’
cf. also:
Pn Niuean maŋo ‘dry (of wood, trees)’
Pn Samoan maŋo ‘dry up; be dry (of wood, clothes)’

POc *ka-[R,r]aŋo ‘be dry; be low tide’
NNG Yabem (ŋa)kɛlɛŋ ‘dry (of a cloth etc)’
MM Kia karaŋo ‘be dry; be low tide’
SES Gela karaŋo ‘dry up; reef, low tide, harvest time’
SES Lengo karaŋo ‘low tide’
POc *goRu ‘dry, of vegetation; coconut growth stage 8: dry and ready to fall’ (Ross 1996d)
NNG Mutu gor-gori ‘dry’
NNG Malai gor-gori ‘dry, ripe coconut’
NNG Kakuna kolu-ŋana ‘ripe coconut’
SES Lengo golu ‘coconut flesh’
NCV Mota kor ‘become dry, with heat or time; coconut in its last condition before it falls from the tree; dry (of other things too)’
NCV Tamambo koru ‘dry, dying (of tree)’
NCV Raga ᵑgoru ‘dry’

Notes⇫