Chapter 5.7 Physical acts

Malcolm Ross

1. Introduction⇫

This chapter presents reconstructions of POc verbs for acts performed with the body or its parts that do not readily fit into the volume’s other chapters. It is, in a sense, a collection of leftovers, but it is a collection that has lessons to teach us.

Terminological reconstruction uses the terminologies of present-day speakers of Oceanic languages as the basis for constructing a hypothesis about the semantic structure of a corresponding POc terminology. This is relatively easy to do if we are reconstructing a set of nouns, like terms for the parts of a canoe (vol.1, ch.7) or the parts of the human body (this volume, ch.3), as these are objects or entities that can be identified visually. It is more difficult when the terms to be reconstructed consist of classes of objects or entities, and class boundaries are determined by cultural and environmental factors, as is true, for example, of plant (vol.3, ch.3) and animal taxonomies (vol.4, chs.3 and 8), of the times of the day (vol.2:294–304), and of human age cohorts (this volume, §2.4.1).

Such classifications differ from one part of the world to another, and sometimes differ across Oceanic communities too. But these classifications can often also be related to objects or entities that have material existence. Verbs, however, denote events and states. Some of the semantic distinctions they make relate to events with physical components (‘winds blow’, ‘people urinate’), but others are more abstract. The more abstract they are, the more careful we need to be not to assume that distinctions encoded by English verbs are similarly encoded by verbs in Oceanic languages and the more semantic change we find reflected across Oceanic cognate sets. To draw examples from this short chapter, Oceanic languages tend to encode ‘beckon’ and ‘wave’ by the same verbs (§7.3.1), and this is also true of ‘slap’ and ‘clap’ (§7.4.1). Acts of washing in Oceanic languages defy single-verb English translations (§7.6).

The somewhat abstract nature of verb meanings means that the internal classification and even the grammatical encoding of a whole domain may be quite different from its classification and encoding in English. For example, many Oceanic languages use serial verb constructions to encode movement, thereby partitioning meanings into manner of movement, geographic direction of movement, and deictic direction of movement (vol.2:256–283 and this volume, §§6.3–6.4), with verbs (or directional morphemes) that occupy each slot in the construction.

A second effect of the abstract nature of verb meanings, however, is that verbs cannot always be neatly assigned to terminologies, as they sometimes overlap more than one semantic domain. Verbs meaning ‘wait’ and ‘hide’ both have a location component. In this they resemble the posture verbs discussed in §6.2, but neither has a posture component. Instead, ‘wait’ has a component of expectation which in certain contexts allows interpretation as a verb of cognition (ch.10), whilst intransitive ‘hide’ resembles a location verb (§6.2) and transitive ‘hide’ a putting verb (§6.6.3.1), but both entail the element of concealment from certain people.

Most of the verbs in this section are verbs that defy neat assignment. Verbs of working (§7.2.2) arguably belong with the verbs associated with horticultural practices (vol.1:129–134), as POc speakers—unsurprisingly—had no concept corresponding to ‘work’ in its western sense. The closest equivalent was ‘work in the food garden’. The pair of verbs meaning ‘clap hands’ and ‘slap with open hand’ in §7.4.1 properly belongs with verbs of hitting in vol.1:267–274, and is a corrigendum in the light of more data to a reconstruction presented there.

All the reconstructions in this chapter denote physical acts, beginning in §7.2 with the most general of these, verbs of doing and working. Then follow two sections on actions done with the hand or arm: beckoning, waving, fanning, seizing and taking hold of, and grasping and holding (§7.3), clapping, slapping and tickling (§7.4). Section 7.5 contains verbs of stamping and treading on, these being the only foot and leg actions that do not fit neatly into manner-of- movement verbs in §6.3. Section 7.6 similarly deals with actions in water that do not belong in the Oceanic manner-of-movement category. Section 7.7 contains the verbs of waiting and hiding briefly discussed above.

2. Doing and working⇫

2.1. Doing⇫

Probably every Oceanic language has a verb meaning ‘do’. Its most common use is with a nominal object denoting an activity, especially in phrases meaning ‘do work’. In many languages it also occurs in the question ‘What are you doing?’ but this usage is somewhat less widespread, as a number of Oceanic languages have an interrogative verb ‘do what?’.

It is clear that POc *pai(t)/*pait-i- can be reconstructed, but it is striking that there are large geographic gaps in the distribution of its reflexes, pointing to widespread lexical replacement leading to numerous local cognate sets but none that unambiguously reconstructs to PROc, PEOc or PWOc, let alone POc. This is probably a result of the fact that in ‘do’ + nominal syntagms, ‘do’ is frequent and typically unstressed. It is therefore subject to phonological reduction which encourages replacement. There is, for example, a scattering of forms with the template *gV: Takia (NNG) -ga[ne], Iduna (PPT) -ga, Nakanai (MM) igo, all meaning ‘do, make’, and Tolo (SES) ago ‘work’, but their monosyllabicity and the mismatches among their vowels suggest that they could readily be due to independent parallel development.

PCEMP *bai(t) ‘do, make’ (ACD)
POc *pai(t), *pait-i- ‘do, make’ (ACD: *pai)
Adm Baluan pe ‘make, cause’
Adm Lou pe ‘do, make’
NNG Sio vet- ‘make, do’
NNG Numbami pai ‘do, make’
NNG Mengen bai ‘do’ (ba-vai durative)
PT Molima vei, ve- ‘become, to turn into s.t. else’
PT Iamalele vai, vai- ‘do’
MM Lihir pec ‘do work’
MM Ramoaaina pet [VT] ‘do, make, cause’
MM Tolai pait [VT] ‘do, make, work, effect’
PNCV *vai, *vei ‘make, do, be’ (Clark 2009)
NCV Tolomako vei ‘do, action’
NCV Valpei vei ‘make, do’
NCV Kiai ve, vei- ‘make, do, kill’
NCV Tamambo vai ‘make, do, be’
NCV Nduindui vai ‘make, do, be’
NCV Ambae vai ‘make, do, be’
NCV Tape ve ‘do, make, cause’
NCV Naman ve ‘make, do; happen; be’
NCV Neve’ei vi ‘be, copula; cause, do, make’
NCV Lonwolwol we ‘be, become’
NCV Paamese (North) vī ‘be, have’
NCV Paamese (South) vē ‘be, have’
NCV Lewo ve ‘be, exist’
NCV Nguna vei ‘be’
NCV Nguna vai-vai-ki ‘perform, depict in play’
PPn *fai ‘do, make’ (POLLEX)
Pn Tongan fai ‘do, attend to, carry out, carry on with, engage in, perform; tell, utter’
Pn Niuean fai ‘make’
Pn Samoan fai ‘do, make, become; say’
Pn Rennellese hai ‘do, get, act as, represent, have, own’
Pn Tikopia fai ‘make, do, prepare, produce, have’
Pn Tokelauan fai ‘happen, become’
Pn Tuvalu fai ‘do, make’

2.2. Working⇫

Pre-contact Oceanic languages had no term for ‘work’ in its Western senses of ‘work as opposed to leisure’ or ‘work as gainful employment’. The closest concept, and one the term for which has in some languages been extended to include gainful employment, is that of labouring in the garden to grow food crops, and especially working to clear land for a garden.

The POc verb for ‘work in the food garden’ was identical in form to the noun for ‘food garden’ (vol.1:117–118), *quma.

PAn *qumah ‘swidden; work a swidden’ (ACD)
PMP *quma ‘swidden; work a swidden’ (ACD)
POc *quma [N] ‘food garden’; [V] ‘clear land for a food garden, work in a food garden’ (ACD)
NNG Gitua ɣumʷa ‘work in garden’
NNG Kove umo ‘work in garden’
NNG Maleu kumo ‘do work’
NNG Atui kum ‘do work’
NNG Avau kumu ‘do work’
NNG Bebeli kumu-mu ‘do work’
NNG Kaulong kum ‘do work’
NNG Mangseng um ‘work with your hands’
NNG Mangseng umo-ŋ [N] ‘work’
NNG Mengen kume ‘prepare a garden’
NNG Uvol um-ume ‘do work’
NNG Adzera -gum ‘do work’
MM Roviana uma ‘make a garden’
SES Gela uma ‘clear away the bushes in making a garden’
SES Arosi umʷa ‘weed a garden’
PNCV *qumʷa ‘work, clear land’
NCV Mota umʷa ‘clear away growth from a garden, first stage of preparation’
NCV Raga uma ‘division in garden’
NCV Sakao yøm ‘to work’
NCV Uripiv -um ‘clear the ground’
NCV Paamese umo ‘to work’
NCV Lewo yuma ‘clear scrub from garden’
NCV Lewo yumʷa-e ‘to work’
NCV Apma umʷa ‘keep garden clear of weeds’
NCV North Ambrym om ‘work’
NCV Namakir ʔum ‘cut grass, clear bush’
NCV Nguna uma ‘cut bush, clear land’
Fij Wayan uma(ni) ‘turn the soil over’

The terms for ‘food garden’ in three MM languages are nominalisations formed with the nominalising infix *⟨in⟩ and *quma, indicating that in the early MM linkage, *quma was a verb meaning ‘make a garden’. The three forms that reflect *q⟨in⟩uma ‘garden’ are Bulu ɣ⟨in⟩uma, Kia (n-un)uma and Roviana (in)uma, all ‘food garden’.

A second term for working in the garden is found in a number of PT languages and MM languages of northern New Ireland which appears to reflect WOc *pai-sok, *pai-sok-i ‘plant (tuber +)’.

PWOc *pai-sok, *pai-sok-i ‘plant (tuber +)’
PT Kilivila paisewa ‘work’
PT Gumawana paisewe ‘work at’
PT Dobu paisewa ‘work’
PT Bunama paihowa ‘do, make, work, create’
PT Iamalele faisewa ‘work’ (borrowed from Dobu?)
PT Iduna -faisewa- ‘work’
MM Lavongai aisok ‘do work’
MM Tigak aisok ‘do work’
MM East Kara faisok ‘do work’

The etymology of these terms is complex and not entirely clear. Their shape suggests that they reflect a compound, as morpheme-internal *-ai- is not a usual part of the POc phonological template. An obvious candidate for the first morpheme is POc *pai(t) ‘do, make’, reconstructed above in §7.2.1. However, the MM forms bear an obvious resemblance to the set reflecting POc *paso(k), *pasok-i below, an expanded version of the set in vol.1:132. POc *paso(k) has a history as a unitary morpheme, and to account for PWOc *pai-sok, folk etymologising must be assumed, whereby *paso(k) was reanalysed as *pa-(a)so(k), consisting of *pa-, the POc causativiser, and the root POc *asok ‘plant in holes in the ground’ (ACD).1 The prefix *pa- was then replaced by *pai-.

PAn/PMP *pasek ‘wooden nail, dowel; drive in, as a wooden nail, dowel, or fencepost’ (ACD)
PCEMP *pasek ‘drive in, as a stake; to plant (crops)’ (ACD)
POc *paso(k), *pasok-i ‘plant (tuber +); drive in (wooden nail +)’
Adm Baluan pat [V] ‘plant’
NNG Gedaged pae [V] ‘plant’
NNG Malai vazogi ‘plant (tuber +)’
NNG Gitua va-vazok ‘plant (tuber +)’
NNG Hote vaðo ‘plant (by making hole in the ground)’
PT Tawala waɣo ‘plant by pushing into the ground; strike a cutting’
PT Hula varo ‘plant (tuber +)’
PT Motu hado ‘plant (tuber +)’
MM Bali vazoɣi ‘plant (tuber +)’
MM Bola varo ‘plant (tuber +)’
MM West Kara fasu ‘plant (tuber +)’
MM Nalik fasu ‘plant (tuber +)’
NCV Mota was ‘drive a hole, make a hole by hammering in some tool’
PMic *faSo, *faSok-i ‘plant; planted; a planted thing’ (Bender et al. 2003)
Mic Kiribati arok-a ‘a plant, cultivated plants’
Mic Chuukese fɔtuk-i ‘plant (s.t.)’
Mic Puluwatese fɔt [V] ‘plant, insert, pick out, select; be inserted, selected’
Mic Woleaian fat [N] ‘plant’
Mic Woleaian fatox-i [VT] ‘plant it, put it in place’
Mic Ponapean pɔt ‘be planted’
Mic Ponapean pɔtok ‘plant (s.t.)’

There remains the question of the origin of the apparent PT reflexes of PWOc *pai-sok listed above. First, a majority of PT languages reflects an innovation whereby *-a is added after a PWOc final consonant, i.e. PWOc *paisok > *paisoka. There is also a tendency for *k to become *kʷ next to a rounded vowel, hence *paisokʷa. Medial *-k- was deleted through lenition, giving *paisowa, the form reflected by Bunama paihowa. Finally, vowel unrounding adjacent to a rounded consonant (*w, *kʷ etc) is widespread in PT, giving *paisewa.

3. Hand and arm actions⇫

Hand and arm actions for which reconstructions are given in this section include beckoning and waving (often the same verb), fanning, taking hold of, seizing by force, and holding something in one’s hand. Verbs meaning ‘point (at)’ are not given here but are listed as part of the cognate set supporting POc *tusu- (N) ‘forefinger’; *tusuq-i- (VT) ‘point at’ in §3.6.8.2.

3.1. Beckoning and waving⇫

POc speakers perhaps had two beckoning gestures. In one, the hand was extended palm down, in the other, hand up. In traditional Oceanic societies (and in SE Asia), the beckoning palm down is the polite gesture, whilst beckoning palm up, European-style, particularly with an extended forefinger, is considered rude. There are a few indications among the glosses of reflexes (Babatana, Longgu, Marshallese) that POc *qalo(p), *qalop-i- denoted beckoning with the palm down. However, it seems possible that it also had the generic meaning of waving or making hand gestures.

Alongside POc *qalo(p) we also find *ta(Ra)-qalo(p) (VI) ‘beckon, wave’. The function of the prefixed element is not understood,2 and it is not clear how the prefixed and intransitive unprefixed forms differ in meaning.

PAn/PMP *qalep ‘beckon, wave’ (ACD)
POc *qalo(p), *qalop-i- ‘beckon with the palm downward, wave’
Adm Seimat aloh-i [VT] ‘beckon’
Adm Lou al-alɔp ‘wave for help’
NNG Manam alo-i ‘beckon’
NNG Mangap -koolo ‘make hand sign to come, beckon to come’
MM Babatana kalopo, kalip-i [VI, VT] ‘beckon using hand with palm down’
MM Maringe kaflo ‘wave, beckon’ (metathesis?)
SES Bugotu aðo-aðo, aðov-i ‘beckon, signal’
SES Gela alo, alov-i [VI, VT] ‘beckon’
SES Tolo kalopi- ‘wave to someone to call them, beckon’
SES Longgu alo-alo, alo- [VI, VT] ‘beckon s.o.; call s.o. without speaking; wave s.o. down’
SES Lau alof-i- ‘beckon with the hand’
SES Kwaio lalof-i- ‘beckon by waving the hand’
SES Sa’a salo, saloh-i [VI, VT] ‘beckon, invite with signs’
SES Arosi aro, aroh-i [VI, VT] ‘beckon with the hand’
PNCV *qalov-i ‘beckon, wave’ (Clark 2009)
NCV Mota alov-aɣ ‘beckon to, invite, greet, by signs’
NCV Araki alov-i ‘beckon, wave to s.o.’
NCV Raga alov-i ‘beckon, wave’
NCV Tamambo alov-i ‘beckon, wave’
NCV Paamese aleh-e ‘wave to s.o. to come; beckon’
NCV Uripiv -luv ‘beckon’
NCV Namakir (bi)ʔalov ‘wave’
NCV Nguna alo-alo, aluv-i [VI, VT] ‘beckon to’
PMic *[alo]alo, *alo[f]-i ‘wave, beckon’ (Bender et al. 2003)
Mic Kiribati ano-ano, ano[i]- [VI, VT] ‘beckon to s.o.’
Mic Marshallese (ceyya)halᶭ ‘beckon with downward motion of hand or by waving arm’
Mic Ponapean ɔlɔ-ɔl, ɔlɛ [VI, VT] ‘wave, signal’ to s.o.’
Mic Mokilese (cei)ɔ̄l, (cei)ɔ̄li [VI, VT] ‘wave at s.o.’
Fij Bauan yalo, yalov-a ‘beckon’
Fij Wayan alo, alov-i- [VI, VT] ‘wave to s.o. or s.t.’
Fij Wayan alovi- mai ‘beckon s.t., signal s.t. to come’
Pn Niuean alo ‘beckon, signal’
Pn Takuu arof-āki ‘beckon’
Pn Māori aro-arof-aki ‘a motion of hands in dance’

POc *ta(Ra)-qalo(p), *ta(Ra)-qalop-i- ‘beckon, wave’
Adm Titan ta-kalo [VI] ‘beckon, wave’
Fij Wayan tā-[y]alo [VI] ‘signal by waving either to beckon or say goodbye, with the fingers of the extended hand curled down’
Fij Wayan tā-alovi-, tā-aloti- [VT] ‘wave to s.o.’
PPn *ta-qalo, *ta-qalof-i- ‘beckon, signal with the hand’ (POLLEX)
Pn Tongan ta-ʔalo [VI] ‘wave or beckon with the hand’
Pn East Uvean ta-ʔalo ‘make signs with the hand’
Pn Samoan ta-alo ‘wave, signal, beckon’
Pn Tikopia ta-aro ‘beckon’
Pn West Uvea ta-alof-ia ‘call by sign’
Pn Tuvalu ta-alo ‘wave the hand’
Pn Pukapukan ta-alo ‘beckon, indicate to come’

POc *kamo(t), *kamot-i- may have denoted the impolite beckoning style, with the palm turned up and forefinger extended, but this is attested only by the Kove gloss. In Polynesian languages reflexes of this term denote both hand and eye signals. The Rennellese reflex denotes the polite beckoning style, but this may be the result of an extension in meaning from impolite beckoning to hand and eye signals in general.

POc *kamo(t), *kamot-i- ‘signal with the hand, beckon (with the palm upward ?)’
NNG Bariai kamo ‘beckon, or gesture with the hand’
NNG Kove kamo ‘beckon with forefinger (palm up)’
MM Tinputz kamot ‘beckon’

PPn *kamo, *kamo-t-ia ‘beckon; make sign with hand or eye’ (POLLEX: *kamo)
Pn Tongan kamo [VI] ‘beckon or make signs with eyes or hands’
Pn Tuvalu kamo-kamo ‘brief, sly wave’
Pn East Futunan [kamo]kamo ‘beckon’
Pn East Uvean [kamo]kamo ‘call by sign’
Pn Rennellese kamo ‘beckon with downward flap of hand’
Pn Tikopia kamo ‘wink, make signs with hand or eye’
Pn Pukapukan kemo ‘wink, blink once’
Pn Pukapukan kemot-ia ‘signal with eyes’
Pn Tongarevan kamo ‘wink; agree’
Pn Rarotongan kamo ‘blink, beckon, make a sign with the hand’
Pn Māori kamo ‘wink’

Blust (ACD) reconstructs PMP *away ‘beckon with the hand’ and PMP *kaway ‘wave the hand or arms; call by waving’. The morphological relationship between the two is uncertain: they may reflect the same Austronesian root (Blust 1988). A few Oceanic reflexes of *kaway are found, allowing reconstruction of POc *kawe ‘wave the hand’. There are also reflexes of an apparent POc *dawe, perhaps descended from a PMP form reflecting the same Austronesian root, but in the absence of non-Oceanic reflexes this can be reconstructed only to PNGOc.

PMP *kaway ‘wave the hand or arms; call by waving’ (ACD)
POc *kawe ‘wave the hand’
PT Iduna (-lau)yawe ‘wave with the hand’
PT Sinaugoro iave [VT] ‘wave to, make sign to’
PT Sinaugoro iave-iave [VI] ‘fan’
MM Bola kave ‘wave’
PNGOc *dawe ‘wave the hand’
NNG Numbami -ⁿdawe ‘wave, wave (back and forth)’
PT Sinaugoro dave ‘wave’

3.2. Fanning⇫

The commonest fan in Oceanic speaking communities is probably one made from the coconut frond.

Reflexes of POc *iri(p), *irip-i- (V) ‘fan’ and its nominalisations are common in EOc languages. If the analysis of Lou tɛrip and Nyindrou taleh as reflexes of the root *irip, prefixed with *ta- SPONTANEOUS (§1.3.5.4), are correct, then the form *ta-irip-i- ‘fan oneself’ is reconstructable to POc. However, this analysis presupposes an early Oceanic form *ta-iripV in order to account for the retention of Lou and Nyindrou -p, and it is not clear why there should have been a final vowel here.

The final consonants of PMP *irid and POc *irip do not match, but the Oceanic evidence supports only *irip.3

There are no known WOc reflexes of *irip, which seems to have been replaced by PWOc *tapi (V) ‘fan’, reconstructed below.

PMP *irid ‘fan’ (ACD)
POc *irip, *irip-i- [V] ‘fan’
Adm Lou tɛrip ‘fan oneself’ (< *ta-irip-i-)
Adm Nyindrou taleh [V] ‘fan’ (< *ta-irip-i-)
SES Kwaio iluf-i- [VT] ‘blow, fan’
SES ’Are’are ereh-i- ‘fan the fire’
PNCV *iri, *iriv-i- [V] ‘fan’
PNCV *iriv-irivi [N] ‘fan’
NCV Mota riv-riv [N] ‘fan’
NCV Ambae iri [V] ‘fan’
NCV Tolomako iri [V] ‘fan’
NCV Raga rive-rive [V] ‘fan’
NCV Raga iri [N] ‘fan’
NCV Nokuku iri- [V] ‘fan’
NCV Nokuku iri [N] ‘fan’
NCV Uripiv -riv-riv-i [V] ‘fan’
NCV Uripiv ne-riv-riv [N] ‘fan’
NCV Port Sandwich ri-rvi-si [V] ‘fan’ (-s- unexplained)
NCV Port Sandwich rivi-riv [N] ‘fan’
NCV Neve’ei riv-riv [V] ‘fan’
NCV Neve’ei n-iriv [N] ‘fan’
NCV West Ambrym e-ri-ri [N] ‘fan’
NCV Paamese lihi-lihi ‘fan oneself’
NCV Paamese ei-lihi-lihi [N] ‘fan’
NCV Baki rivi-riv [N] ‘fan’
PSV *a-iri-iri ‘fan’
SV North Tanna k-el-el [N] ‘fan’ (k- INSTRUMENT)
SV Whitesands k-ei-eil [N] ‘fan’ (k- INSTRUMENT)
SV Lenakel il-il [V] ‘fan’
SV Lenakel k-il-il [N] ‘fan’ (k- INSTRUMENT)
SV Southwest Tanna k-il-il [N] ‘fan’ (k- INSTRUMENT)
SV Kwamera eri-eri [V] ‘fan’
SV Anejom̃ er-ere-i [V] ‘fan’
PMic *irip, *irip-i [V] ‘fan’
Mic Ponapean iri-ir, iri-p [VI, VT] ‘fan’
Mic Mokilese irip [VI, N] ‘fan’
Mic Mokilese irip-i [VT] ‘fan’
Mic Mortlockese uru(pə) [V] ‘fan’
Mic Satawalese uru(pə) [V] ‘fan’
Mic Ulithian rɨ(pəɨ) [V] ‘fan’
Mic Pulo Annian ɨɾɨ(paɨ) [V] ‘fan’
Fij Rotuman iri [V] ‘fan, (wind) blow’
Fij Bauan iri [VI] ‘fan’
Fij Bauan iriv-a [N] ‘fan’
Fij Wayan iri [VI] ‘be fanned’
Fij Wayan iriv-i- [VT] ‘fan s.t., blow air on s.t. by fanning’
Pn Tongan ī [V] ‘fan’
Pn Niuean ili [V] ‘fan; to swing, as a weapon’
Pn Samoan ili [N] ‘fan’; [V] ‘blow (of wind, horn)’
Pn Samoan ilif-i-a [V] ‘be blown’
Pn Rennellese igi [V] ‘fan’; [N] ‘coconut leaf fan’

PWOc *tapi [V] ‘fan’
NNG Takia ti-tawi ‘move or impel air with a fan’
NNG Mangseng tep ‘wave’
PT Gapapaiwa tapi ‘fan, wave, flap’
MM Nakanai t⟨il⟩ave [N] ‘fan’ (⟨il⟩ < *⟨in⟩ NOMINALISER)
MM Patpatar tah [VT] ‘fan, beckon, wave hand to stop s.o.’
MM Ramoaaina tap [VT] ‘fan’
MM Ramoaaina tap-tap [N] ‘fan’
MM Sursurunga tap-i- [VT] ‘fan’
MM Teop ta-tava [N] ‘fan’

3.3. Seizing, grabbing, snatching, taking hold of⇫

A good many Oceanic languages make a distinction between a verb meaning ‘take hold of’ and one meaning ‘hold’. POc verbs that evidently meant ‘hold’ are found in §7.3.4. POc *lawe meant ‘take hold of’, whilst POc *paRo appears to have denoted seizing something violently.

POc *lawe ‘take hold of’
NNG Mengen lau-e ‘catch , hold’
SES Longgu lau-a ‘grab s.t.’
PPn *lawe ‘take hold of, lay hold of’ (POLLEX)
Pn Samoan lāve- ‘apply to, concern, affect’
Pn Samoan lave-ia ‘be attained, achieved’
Pn Pukapukan lave ‘take hold of’
Pn Mangarevan rave ‘grasp (only of tools)’
Pn Rarotongan rave ‘take, lay hold of’
Pn Tahitian rave ‘take, undertake’
Pn Tuamotuan rave ‘take, take hold of, grasp, snatch’
Pn Hawaiian lawe ‘take, accept, carry, bring’
Pn Māori ra-rawe ‘clasp tightly’

POc *paqaRo(k), *paqaRok-i- ‘snatch, seize, rob’ (ACD: *paRo)
MM Tabar paro ‘hold’
SES Gela valo ‘rob openly, take and keep, refuse to return’
PMic *faro, *farok-i ‘hold tightly’ (Bender et al. 2003: Proto Central Micronesian)
Mic Kiribati aok-a ‘deny or refuse (a request)’
Mic Marshallese harek ‘miserly, covetous, greedy, stingy,’
Mic Ponapean parok ‘catch s.t. animate, to arrest’
Mic Chuukese fɔro(pac̣) ‘embrace’
Mic Chuukese fórus-i ‘embrace him, strangle him, hang him’
Mic Carolinian fore- ‘hang oneself’
Mic Woleaian faẓo ‘be tight’
Mic Woleaian faẓox-i- ‘tie it tight, bind it, hug her’
PPn *paqao ‘seize, take by force, rob’ (POLLEX)
Pn Tongan faʔao ‘grab, seize, take by force, confiscate’
Pn Samoan fao ‘snatch, seize, grab; rob (of belongings, money, spouse)’
Pn East Uvean faʔao ‘take by force, usurp, take hold of’
Pn Rennellese haʔao ‘take, capture, snatch, rob’
Pn Hawaiian hao ‘scoop or pick up; grasp, pillage, plunder; robber’
Pn Māori fāō ‘take greedily, devour’

3.4. Grasping, gripping, holding with hand⇫

Four verbs in the semantic domain ‘hold in the hand’ are reconstructed below. They are POc *qabi ‘take hold of, grasp’, POc *tau(r)/*taur-i- ‘hold (in hand)’, POc *poso ‘hold’, POc *gogo(m)/*gom-i ‘hold in the fist’. It is difficult to assign more precise meanings to them, but the meaning ‘hold in the fist’ for POc *gogo(m) is strengthened by that of non-Oceanic cognates.

Blust (ACD) reconstructs POc *qabi and POc *abi, both ‘take hold of, grasp’, and POc *abit ‘hold, get, take’, reflecting PMP *ambit ‘seize with the hands’. On the assumption that the cognate set below reflects a single POc form, the data attest POc *qabi(t), *qabit-i-. Root-final *-t is attested in the Lenakel forms.4 This suggests that the PMP reconstruction should be *qambit.

PMP *(q)ambit ‘seize with the hands’ (ACD)
POc *qabi(t), *qabit-i- ‘take hold of, grasp’ (ACD)
NNG Mindiri kabi ‘hold (in hand)’
NNG Gedaged abi ‘take hold of, grab, seize, grasp, clutch, take’
NNG Takia -[a]bi- ‘hold, grab, grasp, clutch, carry in hand, touch, trap, knead, squeeze out, sieve, strain, rape’
NNG Takia -abi(tani) ‘seize, grasp, keep, retain’
NNG Megiar -abi ‘hold (in hand)’
NNG Matukar -abi ‘hold (in hand)’
NNG Numbami -abi ‘hold, get, take’
NNG Yabem kam ‘hold (in hand)’ (k- for †∅-)
NNG Kaiwa -eb ‘hold (in hand)’
NNG Sissano -ɛp ‘hold’
PT Kilivila kabi ‘hold, take hold of’
PT Molima kapi ‘hold’
PT Diodio abi ‘hold’
PT Iduna -abi- ‘hold, lay hands on’
PT Suau ʔabi ‘hold’
PT Saliba kabi ‘hold’
PT Magori abi(tari) ‘hold’
PT Sinaugoro ɣabi(tari) ‘seize, hold’
PT Sinaugoro ɣabi(ɣero) ‘carry (swing in the hand)’
PT Doura api(kai) ‘hold’
PT Lala -ʔabi(akau) ‘hold’
PT Gabadi -abi- ‘hold’
PT Kuni -afi ‘hold’
PT Mekeo -afi- ‘hold’
MM Nakanai abi ‘take, catch, get, hold’ (∅- for †h-)
MM Nakanai ab-abi ‘carry in hand’
MM Nakanai abi(gabuto) ‘take or hold tentatively’
MM Bola ɣabi- ‘give’
SV Lenakel a-pʷiit ‘stick fast to, cleave to’
SV Lenakel a-pʷiit(etai) ‘hold fast, cling’

PMP *cekep ‘seize, grasp’ has just one known Oceanic reflex:

PMP *cekep ‘seize, grasp’ (ACD)
POc *soko(p) ‘seize, grasp’
PT Motu doɣo- ‘seize, take hold of, restrain’

POc *tau(r), *taur-i- has well distributed reflexes and was perhaps the default POc term for ‘hold in the hand’.

POc *tau(r), *taur-i- ‘hold in the hand’
NNG Gitua tol ‘hold (in hand)’
NNG Malalamai -ton ‘hold (in hand)’
PT Dawawa tau(didi) ‘hold (tight, firm)’
MM Lavongai teŋ ‘hold (in hand)’
MM Tigak ton ‘hold (in hand)’
MM Tiang toi ‘hold (in hand)’
MM East Kara təu-e ‘hold (animate being)’
MM Barok ton(sik) ‘hold (in hand)’
NCV Mota taur ‘hold’
NCV Mwotlap tɪy ‘hold’ (< PNCV *tauri)
NCV Merlav tor ‘hold’
NCV Dorig tœr ‘hold’
NCV Mafea taur-i- ‘hold’
NCV Sungwadaga tor-i ‘hold’
NCV Rerep -tor-i ‘hold’
NCV Uripiv -tor-i ‘hold’
NCal Iaai kɔɔṭ ‘hold’
Mic Kiribati tau- ‘seize, grasp, hold back, retain, hold’
Mic Kiribati tau-tau ‘engage in holding or retaining’
Mic Woleaian tau ‘be saved, preserved, kept’
Fij Bauan taur-a ‘hold’

POc *poso ‘hold’ has only two known reflexes, but given their exact correspondence and geographic distance from one another the term can be reconstructed to POc.

POc *poso ‘hold’
Adm Mussau poso ‘hold’
MM Babatana poso ‘hold in hand, hold onto’

It is important to distinguish between POc *gogo(m)/*gom-i ‘hold in the fist’ below and *gomu ‘hold in the mouth’, reconstructed in §4.3.5.3.

PAn *gemgem ‘fist; hold in the fist’
POc *gogo(m), *gom-i ‘hold in the fist’
NNG Sengseng kom ‘hold’
NNG Tami gu-gum ‘hold (in hand)’
NNG Yabem (me)gom ‘hold (in hand)’
NNG Numbami gu-gum-i ‘hold’
MM Torau gomo- ‘hold’
TM Tanibili gomu ‘hold’
NCV Lonwolwol gomu ‘hold’
NCV Banam Bay -gum-i ‘hold’
NCal Nêlêmwa cimʷ-i ‘hold’
Fij Wayan gō ‘grasp s.t., grab s.t., take s.t. in the hand’
Fij Wayan gom-i- ‘grasp s.t., envelop s.t., close the hand’

4. Interpersonal actions⇫

This section is concerned with acts that people perform on each other, again with the hands. Verbs of hitting are reconstructed in vol.1:271–274. Not all of these are typically used of hitting a fellow human being, but one that is is reconstructed afresh in §7.4.1 in the light of a much expanded data base. A term that might have found its way into this section is ‘stroke’ (in the sense of running one’s hand over part of another’s body), but the only relevant POc reconstruction is *samo(s), *samos-i- ‘massage, stroke’, reconstructed in §5.4.2.2. Reconstructing a verb for ‘tickle’ raises a formal challenge that is discussed in §7.4.2.

4.1. Slapping and clapping⇫

POc *pʷaja(R) [VI] ‘clap hands’
POc *pʷajaR-i- [VT] ‘slap with open hand’
Adm Mussau posala [VT] ‘slap with an open hand’
Adm Mussau posalā [VI] ‘clap’
Adm Baluan (yek) pʊt ‘slap, hit with open hand’ (yek ‘hit’)
Adm Baluan (yek) potpot ‘clap the hands’
NNG Sissano -pot ‘clap , beat’
NNG Sio poⁿza ‘slap; clap one’s hands’
NNG Bariai poda ‘slap’
NNG Mangseng (so)pðal ‘slap’
NNG Mangseng (so)po-pðal ‘clap hands’
PT Gumawana pʷasi ‘clap’
PT Bunama (lima)pʷasi ‘clap hands’
PT Sinaugoro foro ‘slap, hit’
MM Madak pasa ‘clap’
MM Sursurunga posar, posri ‘slap, clap, hit with the open palm’
MM Patpatar pasar ‘slap; beat drum’
MM Ramoaaina par ‘clap ; slap, hit ; play (hourglass drum)’
MM Minigir pasari ‘hit’
MM Nehan posala ‘slap, especially on the back of the head’ (-l- for †-r-)
MM Solos pasan ‘hit’
MM Teop panana ‘slap, hit’
MM Babatana po-posara ‘clap hands’
SES Tolo pica-pica ‘clap hands (together)’
SES Tolo picali- ‘spank; hit, slap or tap with open hand’
SES To’aba’ita fida-fida ‘clap one’s hands in applause’
SES To’aba’ita fidal-i- ‘slap hard’
SES Kwaio fodal-i- ‘slap’
SES Arosi hida ‘slap’
SES Arosi (faʔa)hidar-i- ‘slap’
PNCV *voza ‘clap, slap, strike’ (Clark 2009)
NCV Mota wosa ‘slap, smack, clap’
NCV Raga voha-i ‘strike, throw, shoot’
NCV Raga vosa ‘slap (with one hand) once, clap hands together once’
NCV Tamambo voja-i ‘strike, slap’
NCV Tamambo voja-voja-i (lima) ‘clap, pat’ (lima ‘hand’)
NCV Uripiv -wuj-e ‘smack, slap, pat’
NCV Big Nambas -usa ‘slap’
NCV Port Sandwich voc-i ‘strike with the hand, slap’
NCV Nguna wosa+e-a ‘clap (hands or flat objects)’
NCV Nguna wosa-wosa ‘clap one’s hands’
Fij Wayan voða-, voða-ki ‘slap s.t. with the open hand or hands together’

4.2. Tickling⇫

The collection of Oceanic items considered here is better described as a set of lookalikes than as a cognate set, as it includes instances where regular sound changes have simply not taken place and perhaps also instances where idiosyncratic changes have occurred. This appears to be the result of onomatopoeia, such that the overall shape of a word is retained but some phonological contrasts are unimportant. Clearly this was already the case in PMP, as Blust (ACD) reconstructs *kilik, *kirik, *kidi, *gidik and *giri, all ‘tickle’. The onomatopoeic template is clear: *KiRi(k), where *K is a velar stop, voiced or unvoiced, and *R is a voiced apical (PMP *l, *r or *d). These shapes survive remarkably well into Oceanic, despite the fact that PMP *k- and *g- regularly merge then split into POc *k- and *g- with a strong preference for POc *k-, whilst PMP *-d- and *-r- normally merge as POc *-r-. This implies that onomatopoeic terms for ‘tickle’ have not been affected by regular sound changes.

Partly as a means of simplifying presentation, I reconstruct POc forms below, but because regularity of sound change does not apply, there is no guarantee that a given item is directly descended from the reconstruction under which it is listed. It follows from this that there is also no guarantee that the reconstructions are correct, especially where there are fewer reflexes.

PMP *kilik ‘tickle’ (ACD; ACD)
POc *kilik-i- ‘tickle’
NNG Mangap -kilik [VT] ‘tickle’
MM Patpatar kilik [VT] ‘tickle’
MM Ramoaaina kilik [VT] ‘tickle’
MM Tolai kilik [VT] ‘tickle’
SES Lau kili-kili- ‘tickle so as to make s.o. laugh’
NCV Tamambo hili [VT] ‘tickle s.o.’
PMP *kilik ‘tickle’ (ACD; ACD)
POc *gili(k), *gilik-i- ‘tickle’
NNG Manam gili ‘tickle’
PT Dobu gini [VT] ‘tickle’
MM Sursurunga gilik [VI] ‘tickle’
MM Sursurunga gilki- [VT] ‘tickle’
MM Roviana gili-gili- ‘tickle’
PMP *kirik, *kidi, *gidik, *giri ‘tickle’ (ACD)
POc *kiri(s), *kiris-i- ‘tickle’
Adm Nyindrou (te)kere-ker ‘tickle’
MM Kubokota (si)kiri ‘poke, tickle’
SES ’Are’are kiri(pae-a) ‘tickle’
NCV South Efate kir-kis [VI, VT] ‘tickle’
Mic Marshallese kir-kir [VI] ‘tickle’
Mic Marshallese kir-kirey [VT] ‘tickle s.o.’
Fij Bauan kiri, kirið-a ‘tickle under the armpits’
cf. also:
MM Maringe (fa)ki-kili ‘tickle’
SES Arosi kiri-kiri ‘tickle under the armpit’

The items listed under ‘cf. also’ immediately above may reflect either *kili(k) or *kiri(s).

The three putative POc forms above have reasonable support both from reflexes and from non-Oceanic cognates. But their root-final consonants are perhaps also significant. If the root-medial liquid is *-l-, then the root-final consonant is *-k, but if the root-medial liquid is *-r-, then the root-final consonant is *-s. This suggests two distinct early Oceanic templates, *Kilik and *Kiris.

There is a variety of other Oceanic forms that conform to one of these templates but reflect the ‘wrong’ protoform. The items below are shown with in the fifth column the POc forms they reflect if regular sound changes are applied. All the latter display medial *-d(r)-, but it seems somewhat unlikely that such protoforms ever occurred, as they would reflect PMP *Kindis, for which there is no evidence. The hypothetical forms in the sixth column are the forms expected if regular sound changes had applied to the template *Kiris. It is fairly obvious that Mussau kiri, Halia giri- and Paamese kir-kiris-i reflect the failure of a sound change to apply to the medial *-r-. Dawawa gidi perhaps reflects the formation of a new template *Kidi, which was also the antecedent of Mwotlap ɣin-ɣin. Voiced stops normally occur in Gapapaiwa only in loans from nearby PT languages, but gidi may reflect the presence of unusual sounds in an onomatopoeic item.

Adm: Mussau kiri ‘tickle’ *kid(r)i †kili
MM: Halia giri- (VT) ‘tickle’ *gid(r)i †gili
NCV: Paamese kir-kiris-i (VT) ‘tickle’ *gid(r)is-i- †kilis-i
PT: Dawawa gidi ‘tickle’ *gid(r)i †giri
PT: Gapapaiwa gidi ‘tickle’ *gid(r)i †kiri
NCV: Mwotlap ɣin-ɣin ‘tickle’ *kid(r)i †ɣiy

The two items below both reflect failure of a sound change to apply: POc *r > Nakanai *l, and POc *g > To’aba’ita *k.

MM: Nakanai giri ‘tickle’ *gisi †gili
SES: To’aba’ita gili- (VT) ‘tickle’ *dili †kiri

The items listed below are less easily explained, but they perhaps reflect the emergence of yet another templatic variant, *Kisi.

MM: Nehan (uel)kis-kisi ‘tickle’ *kiti †kiri
MM: Teop gisi-gisi ‘tickle’ *giti †giri
SV: Anejom i-ɣiθi(luk) (VI, VT) ‘tickle’ *kisi †ɣiri

5. Foot and leg actions⇫

A good many actions of the feet and legs are obviously verbs of locomotion like ‘walk’, ’step’, ‘run’, ‘crawl’, ‘limp’ and ‘hop’, for which reconstructions are presented in §6.3, and ‘wade’ (§6.3.3.2). Dancing is an activity with substantial cultural associations in Oceanic communities, and belongs in vol.6. This section was planned to deal with the remainder: kicking, stamping and treading on. However, no cognate sets with the narrow meaning ‘kick’ have been found. When someone deliberately kicks something or someone, this is often expressed with ‘hit with the foot’, and some reflexes of verbs for stamping and treading on sometimes have as one of their senses ‘kick with the sole of the foot’. Hence the reconstructions in this section both relate to stamping and treading on: POc *paRas (VI) ‘step, tread’, *paRas-i- (VT) ‘step on, tread on’ and PEOc *butu (VI) ‘stamp foot, tread, kick’, *butuR-i- ‘stamp on, tread on, trample’.

5.1. Stamping and treading on⇫

POc *paRas [VI] ‘step, tread’
POc *paRas-i- [VT] ‘step on, tread on’ (Geraghty 1990:66: PEOc *(p,v)aRa(c,z) ‘tread on, step on’)
NNG Mangap -para(ama) ‘hold by stepping on, stamp on’
NNG Mangap -para(mut) ‘stamp on, tread on, hurt by stepping on’
NNG Takia -par ‘step, pace, tread on’
NNG Sio pale ‘shove down with great force; step down into, onto’
NNG Mangseng pa-pal ‘step; boost; stand on’
MM Madak vas ‘step on’
MM Nehan paraha ‘put foot against something, place foot firmly’
SES Gela pala-pala ‘steps into a house’
PNCV *varas-i ‘step on, step over’
NCV Mota vara ‘tread, stamp, walk; measure by feet’
NCV Mota varas ‘trample on’
NCV Raga vara ‘step’
NCV Raga varah-i ‘step heavily, stamp (in dance etc); tread on, step in; straddle’
NCV Apma vahr-i ‘step heavily, stamp (in dance etc.)’
NCV Naman veres ‘step on’
NCV Uripiv -ver ‘kick’
NCV Uripiv -veras-i ‘step on, jump on’
NCV Port Sandwich ves-i ‘crush something by stepping on it’
NCV West Ambrym vereh ‘put foot on, tread on’
NCV Nguna vāsi- ‘hold with foot, step, walk on, ride (horse)’
PMic *fā [(VI) ] ‘apply the sole of the foot’
PMic *fās-i ‘apply the sole of the foot to s.t.’ (Bender et al. 2003)
Mic Chuukese ffa, ffæ ‘kick with the sole of the foot’
Mic Chuukese fǣt-i [VT] ‘kick’
Mic Carolinian ffa ‘kick’
Mic Carolinian fāt-i [VT] ‘kick’
Mic Woleaian fā-fā ‘kick’
Mic Woleaian fā-ti- ‘kick it’
Mic Mokilese pā-t- ‘push with the feet’
Mic Mokilese pā-tek ‘push (s.t.) with the feet’
Fij Bauan vā [VI] ‘tread softly’
Fij Bauan va-ða [VT] ‘tread softly on s.t.’
Fij Wayan valað-i- ‘step or tread on s.t.’

POc *butu [VI] ‘stamp foot, tread, kick’
POc *butuR-i- ‘stamp on, tread on, trample’
Adm Seimat putu-i [VT] ‘stamp, kick’
PT Saliba utu ‘to step’
SES Bugotu bū-butu ‘stamp the foot in dancing, tread hard’
SES Bugotu butul-i ‘trample, kick’
SES Gela butu-butu ‘kick with the feet, as in swimming’
SES Tolo butu ‘kick’
SES Tolo butul-i- ‘step on’
SES Longgu butu-butu ‘beat (of heart); do things to show that you are looking for a fight (e.g. stamping feet, preparing to punch someone)’
SES To’aba’ita bū ‘step on the ground, put one’s foot on the ground’
SES ’Are’are pū ‘hit, stamp, tread, rely on, stand firm’
SES Kwaio bū ‘tread, step’
SES Sa’a pū ‘tread, stamp, stand firm’
SES Sa’a pūl-i ‘strike with the talons (of birds)’
SES Arosi pū ‘tread, stamp, rest, stand firm, rely on’
SES Arosi pūli ‘pounce on, of birds, to strike with the talons’
NCV Mota put ‘stamp on the ground (in anger, in singing)’
NCV Raga butu ‘stand strongly’
NCV Uripiv -ʙət ‘take a step’
NCV Port Sandwich ᵐbyr-ᵐbyr-in-i ‘trample underfoot’
NCV Neve’ei bit ‘step on, in’
PMic *pʷutu ‘step, tread, apply one’s foot’
Mic Kosraean fut-fut ‘kick’
Mic Kosraean futu-ŋ ‘kick, stomp (s.t.)’
Mic Marshallese bʷic-bʷic ‘kick, a dance’
Mic Marshallese bʷic(cik) ‘kick, be kicking’
Mic Chuukese pʷu ‘place one’s foot’
Mic Chuukese pʷū-pʷu ‘step, tread, place one’s foot on s.t.’
Mic Chuukese pʷūr-i ‘step on, tread on’
Mic Puluwatese pūr-i- ‘stamp or tread on’
Mic Carolinian bʷu, bʷū-bʷu ‘step, stand on’
Mic Carolinian bʷū-ri ‘step, stomp, tread on (s.t.)’
Mic Carolinian bʷū-ræx ‘stomp the feet (as when throwing a tantrum)’
Fij Bauan butu ‘stamp, tread’
Fij Bauan butu-ka ‘stamp or tread on’
Fij Wayan butu-ki- ‘stamp or tread on s.t., trample s.t.’

6. Bathing and washing⇫

Like §7.5, the present section presents reconstructions for verbs encoding concepts other than locomotion. Hence reconstructions for verbs of swimming, moving about under water, and floating are given in §6.3.3. They include POc *tuRu(p) ‘wade’ and POc *kaRu, POc *qasa and PEOc *olo, all ‘swim’. The reconstructions in this section are actions involving water but not locomotion, and fall into two semantic sets: verbs denoting bathing, i.e. washing one’s body by immersion in water (§7.6.1), and verbs denoting the washing of either part of the body or an object (§7.6.2).

6.1. Bathing, immersing oneself⇫

In traditional Oceanic societies the characteristic method of washing oneself all over is to immerse oneself in a river or, failing that, in the sea. On the basis of the glosses of their reflexes two reconstructions seem to have been terms primarily for washing oneself or someone else, typically a child, in this way. They are POc *siu-siu ‘wash oneself’/*siuw-i- ‘wash s.o’ and POc *ri-riu(s) ‘wash, bathe’/*rius-i- ‘wash s.o., bathe s.o.’ There is a note in Hutchisson’s Sursurunga dictionary file that siwi, the reflex of *siuw-i-, is a generic term for washing, and this was evidently true of the POc form too.

The transitional consonant *-w- in *siuw-i- reflects a minor reconstructive challenge. PMP *ziuq shows final *-q, but there is no reflex thereof in Oceanic reflexes. Instead, Oceanic reflexes point to *-p. However, I infer that pre-POc *siu-i acquired a transitional [w] which was strengthened to Tolai and PEOc bilabial fricative *-v-.

PMP *ziuq ‘bathe’ (ACD)
POc *siu-siu [VI] ‘wash oneself’
POc *siuw-i- [VT] ‘wash s.o’ (Geraghty 1983: PEOc *si(q,∅)u-v- ‘wash’)
NNG Kairiru -si ‘wash (child +)’
PT Gumawana -siwo [VI] ‘bathe oneself, wash oneself’
PT Dobu (e)siwe [VI] ‘wash oneself, bathe’
MM Patpatar si-siu [VI] ‘bathe’
MM Patpatar siu [VT] ‘wash (child +)’
MM Tolai (va)iuv-e [VT] ‘wash (child +)’
MM Sursurunga siu-siu [VI] ‘bathe, swim’
MM Sursurunga siw-i- [VT] ‘wash (child +), clean (s.t.)’
MM Konomala siu [VT] ‘wash (child +)’
MM Solos si-siuh [VT] ‘wash (child +)’
PEOc *siu-siu ‘wash oneself’
PEOc *siuv-i- ‘wash s.o’
SES Bugotu siu [VI] ‘bathe, wash oneself’
SES Gela siu [VI] ‘bathe’
SES Gela siuv-i [VT] ‘bathe s.o.’
SES To’aba’ita sī-siu [VI] ‘wash oneself, bathe’
SES To’aba’ita siuf-i- [VT] ‘wash, bathe s.o.; give s.o. a bath’
SES Lau siu [VI] ‘bathe, wash standing in water’
SES Lau siuf-i [VT] ‘wash s.o., standing in water’

POc *ri-riu(s)/*rius-i- apparently reflects PAn/PMP *diRus ‘bathe’, but with irregular loss of medial *-R-. Only in Wayan Fijian would this loss be irregular.

PAn/PMP *diRus ‘bathe’ (ACD)
POc *ri-riu(s) [VI] ‘wash, bathe’
POc *rius-i- [VT] ‘wash s.o., bathe s.o.’ (ACD: *diRus)
NNG Lukep -riu ‘bathe’
NNG Mangap -ri ‘wash, bathe s.o. by pouring water on them’
NNG Sio lili ‘bathe, swim’
NNG Amara ri ‘bathe’
NNG Kilenge (-wa)liu-e ‘wash (child +)’
NNG Gitua ri-riuz- ‘wash (child +)’
NNG Mutu ri-riu ‘bathe oneself, wash oneself’
NNG Kove li-liu ‘bathe’
NNG Bariai li-liu ‘bathe’
MM Ramoaaina ra-riu ‘wash, bathe’
Fij Wayan riu ‘dive, plunge under water’
Fij Wayan riu-vi- ‘dive for s.t., dive and get s.t.’

POc *su-su(p), *sup-i- below is phonologically very similar to *siu-siu, *siuw-i- above, and it is tempting to assume that the disyllabic root *siu [*siju] has been reduced from disyllable to monosyllabic *[sju], then, because the latter conflicts with Oceanic phonotactics, to *[suː]. This might have resulted in alternant forms in POc or have happened on various occasions post-POC. However, there is reason to think that this inference is wrong. Reflexes of *siu-siu, *siuw-i- all have to do with washing. Reflexes of *su-su(p), *sup-i- point to a semantic element of submersion and diving as well as of washing. Moreover, Gela has contrasting reflexes of *siuv-i- and *sup-i-.

POc *su-su(p) ‘wash by immersing oneself, dive’
POc *sup-i- ‘wash s.o. by immersing them; dive for s.t.’
Adm Mussau sū [VI] ‘bathe, swim, dive’
Adm Mussau sūs-i [VT] ‘bathe s.o.’
NNG Sera su-i [VT] ‘wash (child +)’
MM Tiang su [VT] ‘wash (child +)’
MM East Kara su-suf [VI] ‘bathe, wash’
MM Nalik suf [VI, VT] ‘swim, dive; wash (child +)’
MM Madak su-su [VI] ‘bathe’
MM Madak su [VT] ‘wash (child +)’
MM Tangga suf-i [VT] ‘wash (child +)’
MM Nehan hu-hu [VI] ‘bathe, wash’
MM Tinputz (va)hū ‘wash , bath’
MM Uruava ui-u-i [VI, VT] ‘wash’
MM Banoni sū [VI] ‘swim, dive into water (dive into and through water)’
MM Roviana suvu [VI] ‘swim’
SES Bugotu hū ‘dive, sink’
SES Gela huv-i ‘bathe’
SES Lau sū ‘dive, sink; set (of heavenly bodies)’
SES Kwaio sū [VI] ‘dive, sink’
SES Kwaio sū-fi- [VT] ‘dive for’
SES Sa’a sū [VI] ‘dive, sink’
SES Sa’a sūh-i [VT] ‘dive for’
SES Arosi sū [VI] ‘dive’
SES Arosi sū-hi [VT] ‘dive for’
NCV Vurës suv-suv [VI] ‘bathe, swim’
NCV Vurës suv [VT] ‘wash (hands or plates)’
NCV Mwotlap suw [VT] ‘wash’
PMic *Sū-Sū ‘bathe’
PMic *Sū ‘dive down’
PMic *Sūf-i- ‘bathe s.o., dive for s.t.’ (Bender et al. 2003)
Mic Kosraean yi, yi-yi ‘bathe, take a shower’
Mic Marshallese tiw-tiw ‘bathe’
Mic Mokilese tū-tu ‘bathe’
Mic Mokilese tūp ‘bathe (s.o.)’
Mic Chuukese tɨ̄-tɨ ‘bathe, take a shower, be bowed (of the head)’
Mic Chuukese tɨ ‘dive, duck the head under water’
Mic Chuukese tɨ̄f-i ‘dive for (s.t.)’
Mic Mortlockese tɨ̄-tɨ ‘bathe’
Mic Puluwatese tɨ̄-tɨ ‘swim, bathe’
Mic Puluwatese tɨ ‘dive deep’
Mic Puluwatese tɨ̄f-i(y) ‘dive for (s.t.)’
Mic Carolinian tɨ-̄tɨ ‘bathe’
Mic Carolinian tu, tɨ ‘submerge, dive from the surface’
Mic Carolinian tɨ̄f-i ‘dive for (s.t.)’
Mic Satawalese tɨ-̄tɨ ‘bathe’
Mic Woleaian tʉ̄-tʉ̄ ‘bathe’
Mic Woleaian tū(loŋo) ‘dive in’
Mic Pulo Annian tɨt-tɨ̄ ‘bathe’
Mic Ulithian θu-θu ‘bathe’
cf. also:
MM Teop si-sibu [VI] ‘bathe’ (< *ti-tibu)

POc *sugu(p), *sugup-i- below appears to have been identical in meaning with POc *su-su(p), *sup-i- immediately above. If there is a historical connection between them, however, it is difficult to see what it is. Neither has known non-Oceanic cognates, and one can only speculate that two POc dialects perhaps borrowed cognate terms from neighbouring Papuan languages. The Tongan and Niuean reflexes below reflect PPn *uku rather than expected *huku (which Tongan and Niuean would reflect as huku).

POc *sugu(p) [VI] ‘wash by immersing oneself, dive’
POc *sugup-i- [VT] ‘wash s.o. by immersing them; dive for s.t.’ (Blust 1984b: *suku)
NNG Manam -ruku- [VI, VT] ‘bathe, wash’ (-k- for †-g-)
NNG Bam -ruk-i- ‘wash (child +)’ (-k- for †-g-)
NNG Yabem -sagu ‘wash (child +)’
NNG Roinji sugu ‘bathe, swim’
NNG Roinji sug-i- ‘wash (child +)’
NNG Mindiri suga ‘bathe’
NNG Bing sūg ‘bathe, wash’
NNG Matukar sug ‘wash’
NNG Takia -sug, -sugu- ‘wash, bathe (s.o.)’
NNG Gedaged sug [VI] ‘bathe’
NNG Gedaged sug-i- [VT] ‘make wet, bathe, wash’
NNG Kilenge -suk ‘dive’
NNG Tami juŋ ‘swim’
NNG Sio sugu ‘dive into the water, swim’
NNG Mutu -zug ‘dive’
NNG Gitua -zugu ‘swim on surface’
NNG Bariai -duk ‘dive’
NNG Sengseng suh ‘swim’
PT Dawawa sigu ‘washing the body’
PT Misima hig-hig ‘(have a) wash; (have a) swim’
PT Motu digu ‘bathe’
MM Vitu (va)ðuɣuv-i ‘wash (child +)’
MM Bulu ru-rugu ‘wash (self)’
MM Bulu (va)rugu ‘wash (child +)’
MM Patpatar suguh ‘immerse, dive’
NCV Mota suɣ-suɣ ‘bathe’ (-ɣ- for †-k-)
PPn *uku ‘dive, submerge’
PPn *ukuf-i- ‘dive for s.t.’ (POLLEX: *huku)
Pn Tongan uku ‘dive’
Pn Tongan ukuf-i ‘dive for s.t.’
Pn Niuean uku ‘dive’
Pn Anutan uku ‘bathe in fresh water, skin dive’
Pn Tuvalu uku ‘dive, swim under water’
Pn East Futunan uku ‘dive under water; submerge’
Pn East Uvean uku ‘dive under water’
Pn Emae uku ‘dive’
Pn Luangiua ʔuʔu ‘dive’
Pn Rennellese uku ‘dive’
Pn Sikaiana uku ‘dive or swim under water’
Pn Tikopia uku ‘dive’
Pn Tokelauan uku ‘dive’
Pn West Uvea uku ‘dive’

The forms in initial ñ- and n- listed below under POc *ñu-ñu(p)/*ñup-i-, *ñugu-i- and *ñulu-i- presented a reconstructive problem, as the non-initial consonants do not correspond. The transitive verbs below are each followed by a parenthesised protoform from which they could be descended. At first sight, these appear chaotic, but two sets of facts conspire to provide a solution. The first is that an initial *ñ- on a verb sometimes reflects the application of the PMP actor-voice formative *[pa]N- (vol.1:29–30) to a root with initial *s-. The second is that the non-initial consonants are identical to those found in *s-initial forms with the same meanings, including *sup-i- and *sugu-i- reconstructed above. The hypothesis that emerges is that the transitive forms in *ñ- reflect application of *[pa]N- to *s-initial roots. It is difficult to be certain how the fragmentary survivals from the PMP system worked in POc, but it is reasonable to infer that, for example, *ñu-ñu(p) was the actor-voice intransitive form, *sup-i- the transitive (see the discussion of intransitive and transitive forms of the verb ‘eat’ in §4.3.1.1). This implies that reduplicated intransitive forms like E Kara su-suf and Vurës suv-suv, listed above under POc *su-su(p)/*sup-i-, were back formations created from transitive *sup-i- corresponding intransitives, by applying the POc pattern noted in vol.1:25 (see also Evans 2003:81–84). Similarly, transitives like Seimat nuh-i and Baluan nup reflect the converse application of this pattern to intransitive *ñu-ñu(p). The fact that two POc verb pairs, *su-su(p)/*sup-i- and *ñu-ñu(p)/*ñup-i- can be reconstructed suggests that these processes occurred at some pre-POc stage.

POc *ñu-ñu(p) ‘wash by immersing oneself, dive’
POc *ñup-i- ‘wash s.o. by immersing them; dive for s.t.’ (cf *sup-i- above)
Adm Seimat nuh-i [VT] ‘wash’ (< *(n,ñ)u(p,r,R)-i-)
Adm Lou nu ‘bathe, submerge’
Adm Lou nup ‘wash’ (< *(n,ñ)up-i-)
Adm Baluan nu ‘bathe, wash oneself’
Adm Baluan nup ‘wash a person, bathe s.o.’ (< *(n,ñ)up-i-)
Adm Titan ñu [VI] ‘dive, bathe, go under water’
Adm Drehet nu-nu ‘bathe’
Adm Nyindrou ñu ‘wash, bathe’
NNG Mangseng nu-nu ‘wash, bathe’
NNG Wab nu-n ‘swim’
POc *ñugup-i- ‘wash s.o. by immersing them’ (cf *sugu-i- above)
NNG Ulau-Suain -ñuk ‘wash (child +)’ (< *ñug-i-)
NNG Ali -ñuk ‘wash (child +)’ (< *ñug-i-)
NNG Yalu -nʊʔ ‘wash (child +)’ (< *(n,ñ)u(k,q,r,R)-i-)
NNG Dangal nuk ‘wash (child +)’ (< *(n,ñ)u(k,q,r,R)-i-)

The third of these sets, supporting the reconstruction of *ñulu-i-, does not correspond to a form in *s- reconstructed above. Instead we find three Admiralties forms reflecting *ñ- and three New Ireland (MM) forms reflecting *s- which together allow us to reconstruct two POc transitive forms, *ñulu-i- and *sulu-i- ‘wash s.o.’.

POc *ñulu-i- ‘wash s.o.’
POc *sulu-i- ‘wash s.o.’
Adm Lou niɔl ‘wash’ (< *(n,ñ)ul-i-)
Adm Baluan nul ‘wash s.t., such as food or dishes, laundry’ (< *(n,ñ)ul-i-)
Adm Titan ñulu-i [VT] ‘bathe, wash s.o. or s.t.’ (< *ñu(r,dr,d,l,c)u-i-)
MM Tabar suruv-i- ‘wash (child +)’
MM Notsi sil ‘wash (child +)’
MM Lihir sul ‘wash (child +)’

POc *su-su(p)/*sup-i- and POc *sugu(p)/*sugup-i-, both reconstructed above, denoted bathing but also had a more specialised sense of swimming. The gloss of the Nakanai reflex of POc *lo-loso(p) suggests by contrast that it denoted bathing with a more specialised sense of swimming, perhaps under the surface. In a number of Vanuatu languages the main sense is now ‘swim’.

POc *lo-loso(p), *losop-i- ‘bathe, wash by swimming’ (ACD: *loso-loso ‘bathe, swim’)
NNG Wogeo loso-loso ‘bathe’
NNG Wogeo -la-lose ‘wash (child +)’
NNG Kairiru -luos ‘wash oneself’
NNG Kairiru -lis ‘wash s.o.’
MM Nakanai loso ‘dive, surface-dive, swim under water’
SES Bugotu ðo-ðoho ‘swim, bathe’
SES Tolo leso [VI] ‘bathe’ (-e- for †-o-)
SES Tolo lesov-i- [VT] ‘bathe s.o.’ (-e- for †-o-)
SES Ghari lesɔ ‘bathe’ (-e- for †-o-)
SES Birao lɛsɔ ‘bathe’ (-e- for †-o-)
SES Longgu loto ‘wash oneself by playing or swimming in the water’
SES ’Are’are roto ‘bathe’
SES Sa’a loto ‘bathe’
SES Fagani ro-roto ‘bathe’
SES Oroha roto ‘bathe’
TM Nebao lɔ ‘swim, bathe’
TM Tanibili lɔlɔ ‘bathe’
NCV Tasmate lo-loso ‘swim’
NCV Nokuku lo-loso ‘swim, bathe, wash’
NCV Nokuku losov ‘swim, bathe, wash’
NCV Tamambo lo-loso [VI] ‘wash’
NCV Tamambo losov-i- [VT] ‘wash’
NCV Wusi lo-loho ‘swim’
NCV Unua -ros-ros ‘swim’
NCV Banam Bay -rorox ‘swim’
NCV Rerep -rosə-ros ‘swim’
NCV Uripiv -la-los ‘swim’
NCV Sa -lo-los ‘swim’
NCV Lonwolwol -loh ‘swim’
NCV Lonwolwol -loh-loh ‘bathe’
NCV Apma le-leh [VI] ‘bathe’
NCV Apma lehew-i [VT] ‘wash’
NCV Bieria -loho ‘swim’
NCV Nguna lo-loso ‘swim; bathe, have a shower’
NCV South Efate los ‘swim, bathe, wash oneself’
SV Sye o-ruh ‘swim’

There is a small doubt about the formal reconstruction of POc *kʷaya, as NNG languages have initial w-, most non-NNG languages k-. However, the latter are fortis reflexes (rather than lenis ɣ- or ʔ-), and thus plausible reflexes of *kʷ-.

POc *kʷaya ‘bathe, swim’
Adm Lou kea ‘swim’
NNG Mangap -we ‘dive’
NNG Maleu -we ‘swim’
NNG Mutu waia ‘swim’
NNG Mangseng ke ‘swim free’
NNG Wogeo -wa-we ‘dive’
PT Kilivila kakaya ‘swim’
PT Gumawana kaya ‘swim’
PT Gumawana kay-ei ‘swim with s.t.’
PT Kilivila ka-kaia ‘bathe, wash body’
PT Muyuw ka-kay ‘bathe’
PT Iamalele kayo ‘swim’
PT Iduna -kayo ‘swim (on front)’
PT Dawawa gayo ‘float’
PT Misima gayu ‘swim’
cf. also:
Adm Nyindrou aya ‘swim’
Adm Titan yay ‘bathe, wade, swim’

6.2. Washing and cleaning⇫

In contrast to the terms reconstructed in §7.6.2, the terms presented in this section denote washing one’s hands or face and sometimes washing objects. When they denote washing objects, it is fairly common to find reflexes with glosses that also mention rubbing something to get it clean, suggesting that their central meaning is one of cleaning in general, not just of washing.

Various scholars have suggested that the particular reflex of POc *wasi- known to them (e.g. Lichtenberk 2008) is borrowed from English wash via the local pidgin. However, the collection of reflexes below suggests that a POc term is reconstructable, and that the resemblance between its reflexes and, e.g., Vanuatu Bislama wasem is a matter of chance.

POc *wasi ‘wash’
PT Tawala oɣa ‘wash in or under water’
MM Nakanai uasi ‘wash, bathe’
SES To’aba’ita wasi- [VT] ‘wash s.t. (inc. one’s own body)’
SES Lau wasi- ‘wash (hands)’
SES ’Are’are wasi-kaʔi ‘wash (hands)’
SES Arosi wasi- ‘rub, wash clothes’
SES Arosi wasi-raʔi ‘rub, wash’
SES Fagani wasi- ‘wash (hands)’
SES Kahua wasi ‘wash (hands)’
NCV Tamambo osi-osi [VI] ‘wash hands’
NCV Lewo was ‘wash clothes’
NCV Uripiv (te)wasi ‘wipe, rub’

The fact that POc *pulu, *puRiq and *puqi below all begin with *pu- appears to be a matter of chance.

PMP *bulu ‘wash the hands’ (ACD)
POc *pulu ‘rub to make clean, wash’ (cf vol.1:243)
SES Lau fulu ‘clean, wipe, rub off dirt, wash away earth (of rain)’
NCal Iaai üña ‘rub, massage’ (John Lynch, pers. comm.)
Fij Bauan vulu-vulu ‘wash the hands’
Fij Wayan vū-vulu ‘wash the hands, feet or hair’
Fij Wayan vulu-y- ‘wash a body part; rinse hair with colouring agent, bleach hair with lime’
Pn Tongan fu-fulu ‘wash or scrub; clean (a blackboard)’
Pn Niuean fu-fulu ‘rinse, wash, wash out’
Pn Samoan fulu ‘wash, clean’
Pn Samoan fu-fulu ‘wash (body or object); to clean (as the teeth)’
Pn Anutan pu-puru ‘wash an object other than oneself’
Pn Anutan puru-puru ‘wash oneself’
Pn Tuvalu fulu ‘wash (of one dish, etc.)’
Pn Tuvalu fu-fulu ‘wash (hands, dishes, floor, etc., but not clothes)’
PMP *buRiq ‘wash, as the hands’ (ACD)
POc *puRiq ‘wash, as the hands’ (ACD)
NNG Mangap -puri ‘clean s.t. small, rinse’
PT Sinaugoro ɣuriɣi [VT] ‘wash’
PT Motu huri- ‘wash, scrub’
SES Bugotu vuli ‘wash s.o., pour water on s.t., quench’
SES Gela vuli ‘pour water, sprinkle’
SES Tolo vuli- ‘wash (hands, clothes)’
SES West Guadalcanal vuli ‘wash (hands)’
SES Talise vuli- ‘wash (hands)’

POc *puqi ‘rinse, wash’
MM Nakanai vuhi ‘rinse’
SES Longgu vui ‘wash’
SES Fagani hui- ‘wash (hands)’
Fij Bauan vū [VI] ‘wash, cleanse (feet or hands) with water’
Fij Bauan vuy-a [VT] ‘wash’
PPn *fuqi ‘wash feet or hands, pour water over, soak’ (POLLEX)
Pn Tongan fuʔi-fuʔi ‘pour water on, douse’
Pn Niuean fui ‘dip in water’
Pn Niuean fui-fui ‘wash, water (as plants)’
Pn Samoan fui ‘dip, steep in water’
Pn Tuvalu fuifui ‘sprinkle water over’
Pn East Futunan fuʔi ‘dip, soak’
Pn East Futunan fufuʔi ‘dip, soak’
Pn East Uvean fui ‘dip, soak’
Pn Kapingamarangi hui ‘immerse in water’
Pn Rarotongan ʔui ‘dash water into’
Pn West Uvea fu-fui, fui-a ‘wash, rinse (hands, dishes), clean (house)’
Pn West Futunan fuia ‘moisten something, dunk something, dip, rinse something in liquid and take it out (as in washing clothes)’
cf. also:
Fij Wayan vue ‘(hair) be washed by rubbing hands on the scalp, be dyed’
Fij Wayan vue-ti [VT] ‘wash or dye (hair)’

The presence of -u for †-o in the Mangseng and Hoava reflexes below may indicate that they reflect a protoform other than POc *paño. Nonetheless, the presence of non-Oceanic cognates and the Polynesian reflexes means that Blust is right to reconstruct in the ACD.

PAn *bañaw ‘wash the body’ (ACD)
PMP *bañaw ‘wash the hands’ (ACD)
POc *paño ‘wash the hands’ (ACD)
NNG Mangseng panu-nu ‘wash’ (-u for †-o)
MM Hoava vanu-vanu ‘wash (hands)’ (-u for †-o)
Pn Tongan fano-fano ‘wash hands’
Pn Niuean fano ‘rub, wash (clothes)’
Pn Niuean fano-fano ‘rub (as in washing clothes)’
Pn Samoan fa-fano ‘wash hands or feet’
Pn Anutan pano-pano ‘wash hands’
Pn Tuvalu fano ‘wash hands’
Pn East Futunan fano-fano ‘wash hands’
Pn West Uvea fa-fano ‘wash hands’

The two terms below display skewed geographic distributions of reflexes, but both meet the criteria for POc reconstruction.

POc *japula ‘wash one’s hands, clean s.o.’
MM Nakanai savula ‘brush dirt off a child’
SES Gela havul-i- ‘wash with water’
PNCV *zavula ‘wash one’s hands’ (Clark 2009)
NCV Mota savula ‘wash one’s hands’
NCV Nokuku jo-jowul ‘wash one’s hands’
NCV Kiai za-zavula ‘wash one’s hands’
NCV Uripiv -jejavəl ‘wash one’s hands’
NCV Nduindui sa-savula ‘wash one’s hands’
NCV Unua -je-javur ‘wash one’s hands’
NCV Naman nsəvəl ‘wash’
NCV Naman nsə-nsəvəl ‘wash one’s hands’
Fij Bauan savu-y-a ‘wash feet or hands’
POc *goso ‘wash s.o./s.t.’
NNG Rauto gos ‘wash (child +)’
MM Lamasong goso ‘wash (child +)’
MM Madak gos ‘wash (s.t.)’
MM Label gos ‘wash (child +)’
MM Siar gos ‘wash’
NCV Vurës gʊs ‘wash (clothes)’

7. Verbs with a location component⇫

The verbs reconstructed below, translated as ‘hide’ and ‘wait’, each have a semantic component of location, but not of posture.

7.1. Wait⇫

One waits somewhere for something to happen. Semantically the verb has both a locational component (being somewhere) and a cognitive component (expecting an event). Just one POc verb is reconstructed with this sense.

POc *tari [VI] ‘wait’; [VT] ‘wait for s.t.’5
NNG Dami tari ‘wait’
NNG Mangseng te-tal ‘wait for’
MM Nakanai -tali ‘wait for’ (in compounds, e.g. magiri-tali ‘stand and wait for’)
MM Vaghua tar ‘wait’
NCV Aulua dare ‘wait’ (John Lynch, pers. comm.)
NCV Port Sandwich terere ‘wait’ (John Lynch, pers. comm.)
NCV Naman i-tər ‘wait’ (John Lynch, pers. comm.)
NCV Neverver der ‘wait’ (John Lynch, pers. comm.)
Pn Tongan tali ‘wait, wait for, expect’
Pn Niuean tali ‘wait, expect’
Pn Samoan tali ‘wait for’
Pn Tikopia tari ‘wait’
Pn Hawaiian kali ‘wait, loiter, hesitate’
Pn Māori ta-tari ‘wait for’

Motu (PT) nari (VI) ‘wait’, may be the sole reflex of a POc morphological intransitive *nari (reflecting *[pa]N- + *tari) (§1.3.5.6).

7.2. Hiding⇫

Oceanic languages preserve reflexes of three POc forms descended from PMP *buni ‘hide, conceal’. Two of these are *puni and *muni. Their origin, briefly mentioned in §1.3.5.5, is transparent. POc *puni was the root form, reflecting PMP *buni, and was originally transitive. POc *muni reflected PMP *m-uni, the outcome of adding the actor-voice infix *⟨um⟩ to the root *puni, to form an intransitive, involving a morphophonemic rule whereby *⟨um⟩ + *p- became *m-. Probably this transitive/intransitive contrast was maintained in POc, as it survives in Siar (MM) mumun (VI) vs wun (VT) (Frowein 2011:94), but, as the cognate sets below show, various languages have created an intransitive from *puni and a transitive from *muni, with or without a derivational morpheme.

PAn *buLi ‘hide, conceal’ (ACD)
PMP *buni ‘hide, conceal’ (ACD)
POc *puni [VT] ‘hide, conceal s.t.’
Adm Baluan (ta)pʊn [VI] ‘hide s.t.’
NNG Numbami uŋa [VT] ‘hide’
NNG Kaiwa (vai)vun [VI] ‘hide’
NNG Hote -vuŋ [VT] ‘hide, cover’
NNG Mapos Buang vun [VT] ‘hide, cover up’
NNG Patep vun [VT] ‘steal, hide’
NNG Yalu -fʊm-ʊn [VI] ‘hide’
NNG Sukurum -fum-bun [VI] ‘hide’
PT Ubir (bai)bu-buni-n ‘hidden’
PT Motu huni- [VT] ‘hide, cover’
PT Motu (ta)huni ‘be hidden’ (ta- < *ta- SPONTANEOUS)
PT Gabadi uni-ni [VT] ‘hide’
PT Kuni -buni [VI] ‘hide’
PT Kuni -buni-ai [VT] ‘hide’ (-ai < POc *-aki(n) APPLICATIVE)
MM Tiang uən [VI] ‘hide’
MM East Kara fun [VI] ‘hide’
MM East Kara fu-fun-ai [VT] ‘hide’ (-ai < POc *-aki(n) APPLICATIVE)
MM Nalik fun [VI] ‘hide’
MM Sursurunga pun(mai) [VT] ‘hide’ (mai ‘come’)
MM Konomala funi [VI] ‘hide’
MM Siar wun [VT] ‘hide’
MM Mono-Alu funi [VT] ‘hide’
SES ’Are’are (raʔe)huni [VI] ‘hide’
SES ’Are’are ([haʔa]raʔe)huni- [VT] ‘hide’
SES Arosi huni-huni [VT] ‘hide, conceal’
NCV Mota vun ‘deceive, hide’
NCV Mota (ta)vun ‘be hidden’ (ta- < *ta- SPONTANEOUS)
Fij Bauan vuni, vuni- [VI] ‘be hidden’; [VT] ‘hide, conceal’
Fij Wayan vuni, vuni- [VI] ‘be hidden’; [VT] ‘hide (oneself)’

PMP *m-uni [VI] ‘hide’
POc *muni [VI] ‘hide oneself, be hidden’
NNG Sio mun- ‘hide from (living things, only)’
NNG Tami mu-muŋ [VI] ‘hide’
NNG Kairiru -muñ-aqa- [VT] ‘hide’ (-aqa- < POc *-aki APPLICATIVE)
MM Lavongai mun [VI] ‘hide’
MM Lihir muni-n [VI] ‘hide’
MM Lihir muni-nie [VT] ‘hide’
MM Patpatar mun ‘hide; hidden (of people, objects)’
MM Siar mu-mun [VI] ‘hide’
MM Halia (hata)mun [VI] ‘hide’
MM Taiof (fa)muiŋ [VI] ‘hide’
MM Torau (mu)muni [VI] ‘hide’
MM Laghu (ne)muni [VI] ‘hide’
SES Lau muni [VT] ‘hide, put out sight’
SES ’Are’are (a)muni ‘hidden, lost to sight’ (a- < *ta- SPONTANEOUS)
SES Sa’a mu-muni [VT] ‘hide, conceal’; [VI] ‘be hidden’
SES Sa’a (ʔa)muni ‘lost to sight, sunk below the horizon’
Pn Anutan mu-muni ‘hide’
Pn Tuvalu m-muni [VI, VT] ‘hide’
Pn East Uvean mu-muni [VT] ‘hide s.t.’
Pn East Futunan mu-muni [VI] ‘hide oneself’
Pn Emae mu-muni [VI] ‘hide oneself’
Pn Ifira-Mele mu-muni [VT] ‘hide s.t.’
Pn Nukuoro m-muni ‘be hidden’
Pn Luangiua muŋi ‘be hidden’
Pn Pileni muni [VI] ‘hide’; [ADV] ‘secretly’
Pn Rennellese mu-muni [VI] ‘hide’
Pn West Uvea mu-muni ‘hide oneself’
Pn West Futunan muni ‘be hidden’

The third POc form descended from PMP *buni ‘hide, conceal’ is POc *buni. This is almost certainly not a direct descendant of PMP *buni, as POc *puni has that privilege. Instead, it appears from the glosses of its reflexes to be an alternant to *muni, i.e. an intransitive. The best hypothesis to account for it is that it arose at a pre-POc stage when marking intransitive with *⟨um⟩ was at least still partially productive, but instead of *m replacing *p- (the effective outcome of the rule mentioned above), it was added to it to form pre-POc *mpuni, which by regular sound change became *buni.

PAn *buLi ‘hide, conceal’ (ACD)
PMP *buni ‘hide, conceal’ (ACD)
POc *buni [VI] ‘hide oneself, be hidden’
MM Tolai bu-bun ‘keep secret, keep quiet; vanish, as a ghost or a spirit’
SES Lau buni ‘hide one’s tracks’
SV Lenakel a-pn-ín ‘hide or conceal an action’
Pn Samoan puni ‘screen off, hide; curtain, screen’
Pn Pukapukan pu-puni ‘close, shut, concealed’
Pn Hawaiian (hoʔo)puni ‘deceive, delude’ (hoʔo < *paka- CAUS)
Pn Tahitian pu-puni ‘hide oneself’
Pn Mangaia puni ‘hide oneself’
Pn Marquesan pu-puni ‘hide oneself’
Pn Mangarevan pu-puni ‘hide; be enclosed, shut in’
Pn Rarotongan puni ‘hide’
Pn Māori (faka)pu-puni ‘crouch, lurk, hide oneself’ (faka < *paka- CAUS)

Notes⇫